OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 41, Iss. 25 — Sep. 1, 2002
  • pp: 5383–5390

Evaluation of a variable-addressability monocular

Kenneth Kubala and R. Brian Hooker  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 41, Issue 25, pp. 5383-5390 (2002)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (930 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



A variable-addressability monocular that provides a variation in resolution across the field of view is presented. The variation in resolution is based on the eye’s visual-acuity curve. A prototype has been built that does a nonlinear mapping of the pixels, designed to work most efficiently with the human visual system. In addition a conventional, uniform-addressability prototype has been built. A human-factors experiment is presented that directly compares the variable-addressability prototype with the conventional system. The human-factors results show that the variable-addressability prototype provides better resolution 13% of the time but is 15% slower in use than the uniform-addressability prototype.

© 2002 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(220.3620) Optical design and fabrication : Lens system design
(220.4830) Optical design and fabrication : Systems design
(330.1070) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - acuity

Original Manuscript: December 17, 2001
Revised Manuscript: May 10, 2002
Published: September 1, 2002

Kenneth Kubala and R. Brian Hooker, "Evaluation of a variable-addressability monocular," Appl. Opt. 41, 5383-5390 (2002)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. W. J. Smith, Modern Optical Engineering (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1990).
  2. K. Kubala, R. B. Hooker, “A variable addressability electronic binocular system,” Appl. Opt. 41, 707–716 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. V. E. Diehl, “A variable acuity remote viewing system,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 1976 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 1976), pp. 663–668.
  4. R. W. Fisher, “Variable acuity remote viewing system (VARVS),” in Proceedings of the IEEE 1978 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, NAECON 78, (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 1978), pp. 1172–1179.
  5. M. Shenker, “Visual-simulation optical systems,” in Los Alamos Conference on Optics ’83, R. S. McDowell, S. C. Stotlar, eds., Proc. SPIE380, 22–29 (1983). [CrossRef]
  6. J. P. Rolland, A. Yoshida, L. D. Davis, J. H. Reif, “High-resolution inset head-mounted display,” Appl. Opt. 37, 4183–4193 (1998). [CrossRef]
  7. N. Alvertos, E. L. Hall, R. L. Anderson, “Omnidirectional viewing: the fish-eye lens problem,” in Proceedings of IEEE SOUTHEASTCON ’83 Conference (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 1983), pp. 174–179.
  8. Y. Suematsu, T. Hayase, “An advanced vision sensor with fovea,” in Proceedings of IECON ’90, Sixteenth Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 1990), Vol. 1343, pp. 581–585. [CrossRef]
  9. Y. Kuniyoshi, N. Kita, S. Rougeaux, T. Suehiro, “Active stereo vision system with foveated wide angle lenses,” in Proceedings of ACCV ’95, Second Asian Conference on Computer Vision (Nanyang Technolical University, Singapore, 1995), pp. 191–200.
  10. W. Schoenmakers, B. Roland, “Variable acuity optics study,” Summary Final Tech. Rep. (unclassified) (Hughes Optical Products, Des Plaines, Ill., 31May1991). Final report submitted under contract DAAB07–87-C-F059, which was a three-phase program from August1987 to January1991.
  11. K. Kubala, “Variable addressability imaging systems,” Ph.D. dissertation (University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo., 2002).
  12. K. Kubala, A. Hatch, L. Lewis, R. B. Hooker, “Investigation into variable-addressibility image sensors and display systems,” at Digest of Technical Papers, 1998 Society of Information Display International Symposium (Society of Information Display, Santa Anaheim, Calif., 1998). [CrossRef]
  13. L. O. Harvey, “Efficient estimation of sensory thresholds,” Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 18, 623–632 (1986). [CrossRef]
  14. G. K. Kanji, 100 Statistical Tests (SAGE Publications, Towbridge, Wiltshire, 1999).
  15. C. M. Judd, G. H. McClelland, Data Analysis a Model-Comparison Approach (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Orlando, Fla., 1989).
  16. E. S. Edgington, Randomization Tests (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1995).
  17. P. Good, Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited