OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 41, Iss. 29 — Oct. 10, 2002
  • pp: 6062–6074

Reduced depth of field in incoherent hybrid imaging systems

Sherif S. Sherif and W. Thomas Cathey  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 41, Issue 29, pp. 6062-6074 (2002)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.006062


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1235 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A hybrid imaging system combines a modified optical imaging module and a digital postprocessing step. We define what to our knowledge is a new metric to quantify the blurring of a defocused image that is more suitable than the defocus parameter for describing defocused hybrid imaging systems. We use this metric to design a pupil phase grating to reduce the depth of field, thereby increasing the axial resolution, of an incoherent hybrid imaging system using quasi-monochromatic illumination. By introducing this grating at the exit pupil and digitally processing the output of the detector, we reduce the depth of field by more than a factor of 2. Finally, we examine the effect of using a CCD optical detector, instead of an ideal optical detector, on the reduction of the depth of field.

© 2002 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.2000) Image processing : Digital image processing
(110.0110) Imaging systems : Imaging systems

History
Original Manuscript: January 10, 2002
Revised Manuscript: June 6, 2002
Published: October 10, 2002

Citation
Sherif S. Sherif and W. Thomas Cathey, "Reduced depth of field in incoherent hybrid imaging systems," Appl. Opt. 41, 6062-6074 (2002)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-41-29-6062


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. W. T. Cathey, B. R. Frieden, W. T. Rhodes, C. K. Rushford, “Image gathering and processing for enhanced resolution,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 241–250 (1984). [CrossRef]
  2. J. R. Swedlow, J. W. Sedat, D. A. Agard, “Deconvolution in optical microscopy,” in Deconvolution of Images and Spectra, 2nd ed., P. A. Janssen, ed. (Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1997), pp. 284–309.
  3. A. Erhardt, G. Zinser, D. Komitowski, J. Bille, “Reconstructing 3-D light-microscopic images by digital image processing,” Appl. Opt. 24, 194–200 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. J. A. Conchello, “Superresolution and convergence properties of the expectation-maximization algorithm for maximum-likelihood deconvolution of incoherent images,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2609–2619 (1998). [CrossRef]
  5. C. J. Sheppard, Z. S. Hegedus, “Axial behavior of pupil-plane filters,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 643–647 (1988). [CrossRef]
  6. M. Martinez-Corral, P. Andres, J. Ojeda-Casteñada, G. Saavedra, “Tunable axial superresolution by annular binary filters. Applications to confocal microscopy,” Opt. Commun. 119, 491–498 (1995). [CrossRef]
  7. M. Martinez-Corral, P. Andres, C. Zapata-Rodriguez, M. Kowalczyk, “Three-dimensional superresolution by annular binary filters,” Opt. Commun. 165, 267–278 (1999). [CrossRef]
  8. T. R. M. Sales, G. M. Morris, “Axial superresolution with phase-only pupil filters,” Opt. Commun. 156, 227–230 (1998). [CrossRef]
  9. M. Neil, R. Juskaitis, T. Wilson, “Method of obtaining optical sectioning by using structured light in a conventional microscope,” Opt. Lett. 22, 1905–1907 (1997). [CrossRef]
  10. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996), Chap. 6, pp. 126–171.
  11. A. K. Jain, Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1989), Chap. 8, pp. 267–341.
  12. S. S. Sherif, “Depth of field control in incoherent hybrid imaging systems,” Ph.D. dissertation (University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo., 2002).
  13. J. W. Goodman, Statistical Optics (Wiley, New York, 1985), Chap. 5, pp. 157–236.
  14. L. E. Franks, Signal Theory, revised ed. (Dowden & Culver, Stroudsburg, Pa., 1981).
  15. G. S. Beveridge, R. S. Schechter, Optimization: Theory and Practice (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970), Chap. 8, pp. 355–507.
  16. J. E. Greivenkamp, A. E. Lowman, “Modulation transfer function measurement of sparsearray sensors using a self-calibrating fringe pattern,” Appl. Opt. 33, 5029–5036 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited