OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 42, Iss. 21 — Jul. 20, 2003
  • pp: 4369–4374

Semi-empirical correction algorithm for AC-9 measurements in a coccolithophore bloom

David McKee, Alex Cunningham, and Susanne Craig  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 42, Issue 21, pp. 4369-4374 (2003)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.004369


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (134 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Values for the coefficients of absorption (a) and attenuation (c) obtained from AC-9 measurements in coccolithophore blooms do not provide satisfactory inputs for radiance transfer models. We have therefore modified the standard AC-9 scattering correction algorithm by including an extra term, F(λ, λr), which allows for possible wavelength dependence in the scattering phase function. We estimated the magnitude of F(λ, λr), which is unity in the standard algorithm, by adjusting the absorption and scattering values in Hydrolight radiance transfer calculations until the depth profiles of downward irradiance (Ed) and upward radiance (Lu) matched those measured in situ. The modified algorithm was tested with data from a phytoplankton bloom dominated by the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi, which occurred in the western English Channel in May 2001. In this paper, we only have sufficient data to adequately constrain the radiance transfer model in one wave band centered on 488 nm. A single value of F(λ, λr) = 1.4 was found to produce satisfactory agreement between modeled and observed profiles at four widely spaced stations within the bloom. Measurements of the ratio of backscattering (bb) to total scattering (b) showed significant wavelength dependence at these stations.

© 2003 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.4450) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Oceanic optics
(290.1350) Scattering : Backscattering
(290.4210) Scattering : Multiple scattering
(300.1030) Spectroscopy : Absorption

History
Original Manuscript: November 13, 2002
Revised Manuscript: April 4, 2003
Published: July 20, 2003

Citation
David McKee, Alex Cunningham, and Susanne Craig, "Semi-empirical correction algorithm for AC-9 measurements in a coccolithophore bloom," Appl. Opt. 42, 4369-4374 (2003)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-42-21-4369


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. P. M. Holligan, J. E. Robertson, “Significance of ocean carbonate budgets for the global carbon cycle,” Global Change Biol. 2, 85–95 (1996). [CrossRef]
  2. P. M. Holligan, M. Viollier, D. S. Harbour, P. Camus, M. Champagnephilippe, “Satellite and ship studies of coccolithophore production along a continental-shelf edge,” Nature 304, 339–342 (1983). [CrossRef]
  3. W. M. Balch, K. A. Kilpatrick, C. C. Trees, “The 1991 coccolithophore bloom in the central North Atlantic. 1. Optical properties and factors affecting their distribution,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 41, 1669–1683 (1996). [CrossRef]
  4. W. M. Balch, K. A. Kilpatrick, P. Holligan, D. Harbour, E. Fernandez, “The 1991 coccolithophore bloom in the central North Atlantic. 2. Relating optics to coccolith concentration,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 41, 1684–1696 (1996). [CrossRef]
  5. T. Tyrrell, P. M. Holligan, C. D. Mobley, “Optical impacts of oceanic coccolithophore blooms,” J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 104, 3223–3241 (1999). [CrossRef]
  6. K. J. Voss, W. M. Balch, K. A. Kilpatrick, “Scattering and attenuation properties of Emiliania huxleyi cells and their detached coccoliths,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 43, 870–876 (1998). [CrossRef]
  7. H. R. Gordon, T. Du, “Light scattering by nonspherical particles: application to coccoliths detached from Emiliania huxleyi,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 46, 1438–1454 (2001). [CrossRef]
  8. T. J. Smyth, G. F. Moore, S. B. Groom, P. E. Land, T. Tyrrell, “Optical modelling and measurements of a coccolithophore bloom,” Appl. Opt. 42, 7679–7688 (2002). [CrossRef]
  9. J. R. V. Zaneveld, J. C. Kitchen, C. M. Moore, “The scattering error correction of reflecting-tube absorption meters,” in Ocean Optics XII, J. S. Jaffe, ed., Proc. SPIE2258, 44–55 (1994). [CrossRef]
  10. M. Babin, D. Stramski, “Light absorption by aquatic particles in the near-infrared spectral region,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 47, 911–915 (2002). [CrossRef]
  11. W. S. Pegau, D. Gray, J. R. V. Zaneveld, “Absorption and attenuation of visible and near-infrared light in water: dependence on temperature and salinity,” Appl. Opt. 36, 6035–6046 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. G. R. Fournier, J. L. Forand, “Analytic phase function for ocean water,” in Ocean Optics XII, J. S. Jaffe, ed., Proc. SPIE2258, 194–201 (1994). [CrossRef]
  13. J. T. O. Kirk, “Monte Carlo modeling of the performance of a reflective tube absorption meter,” Appl. Opt. 31, 6463–6468 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited