OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 42, Iss. 24 — Aug. 20, 2003
  • pp: 4811–4818

Numerical simulations of multiconjugate adaptive optics wave-front reconstruction on giant telescopes

Brent L. Ellerbroek, Luc Gilles, and Curtis R. Vogel  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 42, Issue 24, pp. 4811-4818 (2003)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.004811


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (132 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We present sample Monte Carlo simulation results to illustrate the trends in multiconjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) performance as the telescope aperture diameter increases from 8 to 32 m with all other first-order system parameters held constant. The MCAO system considered includes three deformable mirrors, a 1-arc min square field of view, and five wave-front-sensing references consisting of either natural guide stars or laser guide stars at a range of either 30 or 90 km. The rms residual wave-front error decreases slowly with increasing aperture diameter with natural guide stars, whereas performance degrades significantly with increasing aperture diameter for laser guide stars at 30 km if the number of guide stars is held fixed. Performance with laser guide stars at 90 km is a weak function of telescope aperture diameter in the range from 8 to 32 m, with rms wave-front errors no more than 20% greater than the corresponding natural guide-star case for the same level of wave-front sensor’s measurement noise.

© 2003 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.1080) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Active or adaptive optics

History
Original Manuscript: January 16, 2003
Revised Manuscript: May 24, 2003
Published: August 20, 2003

Citation
Brent L. Ellerbroek, Luc Gilles, and Curtis R. Vogel, "Numerical simulations of multiconjugate adaptive optics wave-front reconstruction on giant telescopes," Appl. Opt. 42, 4811-4818 (2003)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-42-24-4811


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. M. Beckers, “Increasing the size of the isoplanatic patch with multi-conjugate adaptive optics,” in Proceedings of European Southern Observatory Conference and Workshop on Very Large Telescopes and Their Instrumentation, M.-H. Ulrich, ed., Vol. 30 of ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 1988), pp. 693–703.
  2. J. E. Nelson, “CELT rocks,” in Future Giant Telescopes, J. R. P. Angel, R. Gilmozzi, eds., Proc. SPIE4840, 47–59 (2002). [CrossRef]
  3. S. E. Strom, L. M. Stepp, M. Mountain, B. Gregory, “Giant segmented mirror telescope: a point design based on science drivers,” in Future Giant Telescopes, J. R. P. Angel, R. Gilmozzi, eds., Proc. SPIE4840, 116–128 (2002). [CrossRef]
  4. P. Dierickx, J. Beckers, E. Brunetto, R. Gilmozzi, F. Koch, E. Marchetti, G. J. Monnet, M. Quattri, M. S. Sarazin, J. Spyromilio, N. Yaitskova, “The eye of the beholder: designing the OWL,” in Future Giant Telescopes, J. R. P. Angel, R. Gilmozzi, eds., Proc. SPIE4840, 151–170 (2002). [CrossRef]
  5. B. L. Ellerbroek, “First-order performance evaluation of adaptive-optics systems for atmospheric-turbulence compensation in extended-field-of-view astronomical telescopes,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 783–805 (1994). [CrossRef]
  6. T. Fusco, J.-M. Conan, G. Rousset, L. M. Mugnier, V. Michau, “Optimal wave-front reconstruction strategies for multiconjugate adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2527–2538 (2001). [CrossRef]
  7. B. L. Ellerbroek, F. J. Rigaut, “Scaling multiconjugate adaptive optics performance estimates to extremely large telescopes,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE4007, 1088–1099 (2000). [CrossRef]
  8. A. Tokovinin, M. Le Louarn, M. Sarazin, “Isoplanatism in multiconjugate adaptive optics system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 1819–1827 (2000). [CrossRef]
  9. B. L. Ellerbroek, L. Gilles, C. R. Vogel, “A computationally efficient wavefront reconstructor for simulation of multi-conjugate adaptive optics on giant telescopes,” in Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE4839, 989–1000 (2003). [CrossRef]
  10. L. Gilles, B. L. Ellerbroek, C. R. Vogel, “Layer-oriented multigrid wavefront reconstruction algorithms for multi-conjugate adaptive optics,” in Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE4839, 1011–1022 (2003). [CrossRef]
  11. B. L. Ellerbroek, F. J. Rigaut, C. Boyer, C. d’Orgeville, M. R. Hunten, E. James, J. Sebag, “Multiconjugate adaptive optics for Gemini-South,” in Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE4839, 55–66 (2003). [CrossRef]
  12. E. P. Wallner, “Optimal wave-front correction using slope measurement,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 1771–1776 (1983). [CrossRef]
  13. B. M. Walsh, C. S. Gardner, “Effects of turbulence-induced anisoplanatism on the imaging performance of adaptive-astronomical telescopes using laser guide stars,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 69–80 (1991). [CrossRef]
  14. G. M. Cochran, “Sparse matrix techniques in wavefront reconstruction,” (The Optical Sciences Company, Anaheim, Calif., 1986).
  15. B. L. Ellerbroek, “Efficient computation of minimum-variance wave-front reconstructors with sparse matrix techniques,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 1803–1816 (2002). [CrossRef]
  16. S. Pissanetsky, Sparse Matrix Technology (Academic, Orlando, Fla., 1984), Chap. 4.
  17. M. Tordi, R. Ragazzoni, E. Diolaiti, “Simulations of a layer oriented MCAO system,” in Beyond Conventional Adaptive Optics, E. Vernet, R. Ragazzoni, S. Esposito, N. Hubin, eds., Vol. 58 of ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 2002), pp. 223–230.
  18. L. Gilles, C. R. Vogel, B. L. Ellerbroek, “Iterative algorithms for large scale wave front reconstruction,” in Signal Recovery and Synthesis, Vol. 67 of OSA Trends in Optics and Photonics Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 2001), pp. 100–101 (postconference edition).
  19. J. Vernin, A. Agabi, R. Avila, M. Azouit, R. Conan, F. Martin, E. Masciadri, L. Sanchez, A. Ziad, “1998 Gemini site testing campaign: Cerro Pachon and Cerro Tololo,” (Gemini Observatory, Hilo, Hawaii, 2000).
  20. G. A. Tyler, “Turbulence-induced adaptive-optics performance evaluation: degradation in the time domain,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 251–262 (1984). [CrossRef]
  21. G. A. Tyler, “Merging: a new method for tomography through random media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 409–424 (1994). [CrossRef]
  22. I. A. de La Rue, B. L. Ellerbroek, “Multiple guide stars to improve the performance of laser guide star adaptive optical systems,” in Adaptive Optical System Technologies, D. Bonaccini, R. K. Tyson, eds., Proc. SPIE3353, 310–319 (1998). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited