OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 42, Iss. 24 — Aug. 20, 2003
  • pp: 4955–4962

Transmitted and reflected scattering matrices from an English oak leaf

Sergey N. Savenkov, Ranjan S. Muttiah, and Yevgeny A. Oberemok  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 42, Issue 24, pp. 4955-4962 (2003)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (215 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The complete Mueller matrix for an English oak (Quercus robur) leaf for a fixed azimuth angle (90°) was determined immediately after plucking and a day following exposure to normal room temperature and pressures. The Mueller matrices were determined for transmitted light at observation angles ranging from 0° to 24° and for reflected backscattering angles from 153° to 170°. All the measurements were taken with a He-Ne laser light source at 0.63 µm. Since positive eigenvalues were obtained for the coherence matrix, the polarimetric measurements were physically realizable. The anisotropy parameters were determined from the Jones matrices by use of the decomposition theorem. From the M33 and M44 components of the Mueller matrices, it was found that nonspherical structures within the leaf were primarily responsible for observed transmitted light scatter, and spherical structures were mostly responsible for observed backscatter. Variations in backscatter Mueller matrix elements from a fresh leaf to a second day of observation were assumed because of changes to water vapor concentration in the leaf.

© 2003 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(030.6600) Coherence and statistical optics : Statistical optics
(260.2130) Physical optics : Ellipsometry and polarimetry
(260.5130) Physical optics : Photochemistry
(290.1350) Scattering : Backscattering
(290.4210) Scattering : Multiple scattering
(290.5850) Scattering : Scattering, particles

Original Manuscript: November 12, 2002
Revised Manuscript: May 7, 2003
Published: August 20, 2003

Sergey N. Savenkov, Ranjan S. Muttiah, and Yevgeny A. Oberemok, "Transmitted and reflected scattering matrices from an English oak leaf," Appl. Opt. 42, 4955-4962 (2003)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. R. N. Clark, T. L. Roush, “Reflectance spectroscopy: quantitative analysis techniques for remote sensing applications,” J. Geophys. Res. 89, 6329–6340 (1984). [CrossRef]
  2. C. F. Bohren, D. R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley, New York, 1983).
  3. P. N. Raven, D. L. Jordan, C. E. Smith, “Polarized directional reflectance from laurel and mullein leaves,” Opt. Eng. 41, 1002–1012 (2002). [CrossRef]
  4. R. S. Muttiah, “Light scattering from a leaf using the T-matrix method,” in From Spectroscopy to Remotely Sensed Spectra of Terrestrial Ecosystems, R. S. Muttiah, ed. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002), pp. 67–75.
  5. M. G. Holmes, D. R. Keiller, “Effects of pubescence and waxes on the reflectance of leaves in the ultraviolet and photosynthetic wavebands: a comparison of a range of species,” Plant Cell Environ. 25, 85–93 (2002). [CrossRef]
  6. S. N. Savenkov, “Optimization and structuring of the instrument matrix for polarimetric measurements,” Opt. Eng. 41, 965–972 (2002). [CrossRef]
  7. S. R. Cloude, “Group theory and polarization algebra,” Optik (Stuttgart) 75, 26–36 (1986).
  8. M. I. Mishchenko, J. W. Hovenier, “Depolarization of light backscattered by randomly oriented nonspherical particles,” Opt. Lett. 20, 1356–1358 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. S. R. Cloude, E. Pottier, “Concept of polarization anisotropy in optical scattering,” Opt. Eng. 34, 1599–1610 (1995). [CrossRef]
  10. C. Brosseau, Fundamentals of Polarized Light, a Statistical Approach (Wiley, New York, 1998).
  11. R. M. Azzam, N. M. Bashara, Ellipsometry and Polarized Light (North-Holland, New York, 1987).
  12. V. V. Mar’enko, S. N. Savenkov, “Representation of arbitrary Mueller matrix on the basis of circular and linear anisotropy,” Opt. Spectrosc. 76, 94–96 (1994).
  13. G. E. Forsythe, M. A. Malcolm, C. B. Moler, Computer Methods for Mathematical Computation (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1977).
  14. Y. I. Astrashevski, A. B. Sikorski, V. V. Sikorski, G. F. Stelmakh, V. I. Shuplyak, “Spectrophotometric characteristics of radiation scattered from plant leaves under stressed conditions,” J. Appl. Spectrosc. 65, 103–113 (1998), in Russian.
  15. Y. I. Astrashevski, A. B. Sikorski, V. V. Sikorski, G. F. Stelmakh, “Some peculiarities of light reflection and scattering by plant leaf,” J. Appl. Spectrosc. 66, 100–108 (1999), in Russian.
  16. H. C. van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles (Dover, New York, 1981), pp. 40–59.
  17. M. S. Quinby-Hunt, P. G. Hull, A. J. Hunt, “Polarized light scattering in the marine environment,” in Light Scattering by Nonspherical Particles, M. I. Mishchenko, J. W. Hovenier, L. D. Travis, eds., (Academic, San Diego, Calif., 2000), pp. 525–554. [CrossRef]
  18. R. P. Feynman, QED: the Strange Theory of Light and Matter (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1985), pp. 54–60.
  19. T. C. Vogelmann, “Plant tissue optics,” Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 44, 231–251 (1993). [CrossRef]
  20. O. Björkman, “Responses to different quantum flux densities,” in Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, O. L. Lange, P. S. Nobel, H. Ziegler, eds. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981), Vol. 12, pp. 57–106.
  21. N. K. Boardman, “Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants,” Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28, 355–377 (1977). [CrossRef]
  22. R. W. Pearcy, “Sunflecks and photosynthesis in plant canopies,” Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 41, 421–453 (1990). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited