OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 42, Iss. 6 — Feb. 20, 2003
  • pp: 1140–1144

Real-Time Inversion of Polarization Gate Frequency-Resolved Optical Gating Spectrograms

Daniel J. Kane, Jeremy Weston, and Kai-Chien J. Chu  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 42, Issue 6, pp. 1140-1144 (2003)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (398 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Frequency-resolved optical gating (FROG) is a technique used to measure the intensity and phase of ultrashort laser pulses through the optical construction of a spectrogram of the pulse. To obtain quantitative information about the pulse from its spectrogram, an iterative two-dimensional phase-retrieval algorithm must be used. Current algorithms are quite robust, but retrieval of all the pulse information can be slow. Previous real-time FROG trace inversion work focused on second-harmonic-generation FROG, which has an ambiguity in the direction of time, and required digital signal processors (DSPs). We develop a simplified real-time FROG device based on a single-shot geometry that no longer requires DSPs. We use it and apply the principal component generalized projections algorithm to invert polarization gate FROG traces at rates as high as 20 Hz.

© 2003 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(320.0320) Ultrafast optics : Ultrafast optics
(320.7100) Ultrafast optics : Ultrafast measurements
(320.7160) Ultrafast optics : Ultrafast technology

Daniel J. Kane, Jeremy Weston, and Kai-Chien J. Chu, "Real-Time Inversion of Polarization Gate Frequency-Resolved Optical Gating Spectrograms," Appl. Opt. 42, 1140-1144 (2003)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. D. J. Kane and R. Trebino, “Characterization of arbitrary femtosecond pulses using frequency-resolved optical gating,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 29, 571–579 (1993).
  2. D. J. Kane, and R. Trebino, “Single-shot measurement of the intensity and phase of an arbitrary ultrashort pulse by using frequency-resolved optical gating,” Opt. Lett. 18, 823–825 (1993).
  3. R. Trebino, K. W. DeLong, D. N. Fittinghoff, J. N. Sweetser, M. A. Krumbügel, B. A. Richman, and D. J. Kane, “Measuring ultrashort laser pulses in the time-frequency domain using frequency-resolved optical gating,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 3277–3295 (1997).
  4. D. J. Kane, G. Rodriguez, A. J. Taylor, and T. S. Clement, “Simultaneous measurement of two ultrashort laser pulses from a single spectrogram in a single shot,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 14, 935–943 (1997).
  5. D. J. Kane, “Real-time measurement of ultrashort laser pulses using principal component generalized projections,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 4, 278–284 (1998).
  6. D. J. Kane, “Recent progress toward real-time measurement of ultrashort laser pulses,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 35, 421–431 (1999).
  7. R. Trebino and D. J. Kane, “Using phase retrieval to measure the intensity and phase of ultrashort laser pulses: frequency-resolved optical gating,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 1101–1111 (1993).
  8. J. R. Fienup, “Reconstruction of a complex-valued object from the modulus of its Fourier transform using a support constraint,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 118–123 (1987).
  9. T. M. Shuman, M. E. Anderson, J. Bromage, C. Iaconis, L. Waxer, and I. A. Walmsley, “Real-time SPIDER: ultrashort pulse characterization at 20 Hz,” Opt. Express 5, 134–143 (1999).
  10. L. Gallmann, D. H. Sutter, N. Matuschek, G. Steinmeyer, U. Keller, C. Iaconis, and I. A. Walmsley, “Characterization of sub-6-fs optical pulses with spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction,” Opt. Lett. 24, 1314–1316 (1999).
  11. C. Iaconis, V. Wong, and I. A. Walmsley, “Direct interferometric techniques for characterizing ultrashort optical pulses,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 4, 285–294 (1998).
  12. C. W. Siders, A. J. Taylor, and M. C. Downer, “Multipulse interferometric frequency-resolved optical gating: real-time phase-sensitive imaging of ultrafast dynamics,” Opt. Lett. 22, 624–626 (1997).
  13. D. J. Kane, F. G. Omenetto, and A. J. Taylor, “Convergence test for inversion of frequency-resolved optical gating spectrograms,” Opt. Lett. 25, 1216–1218 (2000).
  14. E. Yudilevich, A. Levi, G. J. Habetler, and H. Stark, “Restoration of signals from their signed Fourier-transform magnitude by the method of generalized projections,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 236–246 (1987).
  15. A. Levi and H. Stark, “Image restoration by the method of generalized projections with applications to restoration from magnitude,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 932–943 (1984).
  16. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipies in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University, Cambridge, England, 1995).
  17. D. T. Reid, “Algorithm for complete and rapid retrieval of ultrashort pulse amplitude and phase from a sonogram,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 35, 1584–1589 (1999).
  18. J. L. A. Chilla and O. E. Martinez, “Direct determination of the amplitude and phase of femtosecond light pulses,” Opt. Lett. 16, 39–41 (1991).
  19. E. B. Treacy, “Measurement and interpretation of dynamic spectrograms of picosecond light pulses,” J. Appl. Phys. 42, 3848–3858 (1971).
  20. L. Cohen, “Time-frequency distributions—a review,” Proc. IEEE 77, 941–981 (1989).
  21. V. Wong and I. A. Walmsley, “Ultrashort-pulse characterization from dynamic spectrograms by iterative phase retrieval,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14, 944–949 (1997).
  22. A. K. Jain, Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing, 1st ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1989).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited