OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 43, Iss. 12 — Apr. 20, 2004
  • pp: 2588–2597

Comparison of Nanosecond and Picosecond Excitation for Two-Photon Laser-Induced Fluorescence Imaging of Atomic Oxygen in Flames

Jonathan H. Frank, Xiangling Chen, Brian D. Patterson, and Thomas B. Settersten  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 43, Issue 12, pp. 2588-2597 (2004)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.43.002588


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (931 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Two-photon laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) imaging of atomic oxygen is investigated in premixed hydrogen and methane flames with nanosecond and picosecond pulsed lasers at 226 nm. In the hydrogen flame, the interference from photolysis is negligible compared with the LIF signal from native atomic oxygen, and the major limitations on quantitative measurements are stimulated emission and photoionization. Excitation with a nanosecond laser is advantageous in the hydrogen flames, because it reduces the effects of stimulated emission and photoionization. In the methane flames, however, photolytic interference is the major complication for quantitative O-atom measurements. A comparison of methane and hydrogen flames indicates that vibrationally excited CO2 is the dominant precursor for laser-generated atomic oxygen. In the methane flames, picosecond excitation offers a significant advantage by dramatically reducing the photolytic interference. The prospects for improved O-atom imaging in hydrogen and hydrocarbon flames are presented.

© 2004 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(110.0110) Imaging systems : Imaging systems
(120.1740) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Combustion diagnostics
(280.1740) Remote sensing and sensors : Combustion diagnostics
(280.2470) Remote sensing and sensors : Flames
(300.2530) Spectroscopy : Fluorescence, laser-induced
(300.6410) Spectroscopy : Spectroscopy, multiphoton

Citation
Jonathan H. Frank, Xiangling Chen, Brian D. Patterson, and Thomas B. Settersten, "Comparison of Nanosecond and Picosecond Excitation for Two-Photon Laser-Induced Fluorescence Imaging of Atomic Oxygen in Flames," Appl. Opt. 43, 2588-2597 (2004)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-43-12-2588


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. M. Aldén, H. Edner, P. Grafström, and S. Svanberg, “Two-photon excitation of atomic oxygen in a flame,” Opt. Commun. 42, 244–246 (1982).
  2. J. E. M. Goldsmith, “Photochemical effects in two-photon-excited fluorescence detection of atomic oxygen in flames,” Appl. Opt. 26, 3566–3572 (1987).
  3. U. Meier, J. Bittner, K. Kohse-Höinghaus, and T. Just, “Discussion of two-photon laser-excited fluorescence as a method for quantitative detection of oxygen atoms in flames,” in the Twenty-Second Symposium (International) on Combustion (Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1988), pp. 1887–1896.
  4. I. J. Wysong, J. B. Jeffries, and D. R. Crosley, “Laser-induced fluorescence of O(3p 3P), O2, and NO near 226 nm: photolytic interferences and simultaneous excitation in flames,” Opt. Lett. 14, 767–769 (1989).
  5. K. C. Smyth and P. H. Tjossem, “Radical concentration measurements in hydrocarbon diffusion flames,” Appl. Phys. B 50, 499–511 (1990).
  6. K. C. Smyth and P. H. Tjossem, “Relative H-atom and O-atom concentration measurements in a laminar methane/air diffusion flame,” in the Twenty-Third Symposium (International) on Combustion (Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1990), pp. 1829–1837.
  7. L. Gasnot, P. Desgroux, J. F. Pauwels, and L. R. Sochet, “Improvement of two-photon laser-induced fluorescence measurements of H- and O-atoms in premixed methane/air flames,” Appl. Phys. B 65, 639–646 (1997).
  8. U. Meier, K. Kohse-Höinghaus, and Th. Just, “H and O atom detection for combustion applications: study of quenching and laser photolysis effects,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 126, 567–573 (1986).
  9. A. W. Miziolek and M. A. DeWilde, “Multiphoton photochemical and collisional effects during oxygen-atom flame detection,” Opt. Lett. 9, 390–392 (1984).
  10. D. L. van Oostendorp, H. B. Levinsky, C. E. van der Meji, R. A. A. M. Jacobs, and W. T. A. Borghols, “Avoidance of the photochemical production of oxygen atoms in one-dimensional, two-photon laser-induced fluorescence imaging,” Appl. Opt. 32, 4636–4640 (1993).
  11. T. B. Settersten, A. Dreizler, B. D. Patterson, P. E. Schrader, and R. L. Farrow, “Photolytic interference affecting two-photon laser-induced fluorescence detection of atomic oxygen in hydrocarbon flames,” Appl. Phys. B 76, 479–482 (2003).
  12. M. Aldén, U. Westblom, and J. E. M. Goldsmith, “Two-photon-excited stimulated emission from atomic oxygen in flames and cold gases,” Opt. Lett. 14, 305–307 (1989).
  13. M. Aldén, H. M. Hertz, S. Svanberg, and S. Wallin, “Imaging laser-induced fluorescence of oxygen atoms in a flame,” Appl. Opt 23, 3255–3257 (1984).
  14. R. J. Kee, J. F. Grear, M. D. Smooke, and J. A. Miller, “A Fortran program for modeling steady laminar one-dimensional premixed flames,” Tech. Rep. SAND85–8240 (Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, Calif., 1985).
  15. G. P. Smith, D. M. Golden, M. Frenklach, N. W. Moriarty, B. Eiteneer, M. Goldenberg, C. T. Bowman, R. K. Hanson, S. Song, W. C. Gardiner, Jr., V. V. Lissianski, and Z. Qin, “GRI-Mech 3.0 Home Page,” http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech/(1999).
  16. R. A. Yetter, F. L. Dryer, and H. Rabitz, “A comprehensive reaction-mechanism for carbon-monoxide hydrogen oxygen kinetics,” Combust. Sci. Technol. 79, 97–128 (1991).
  17. M. E. Riley, “Growth of parametric fields in (2 + 1)-photon laser ionization of atomic oxygen,” Phys. Rev A 41, 4843–4856 (1990).
  18. F. Ossler, J. Larsson, and M. Aldén, “Measurements of the effective lifetime of O atoms in atmospheric premixed flames,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 250, 287–292 (1996).
  19. D. J. Bamford, L. E. Jusinski, and W. K. Bischel, “Absolute two-photon absorption and three-photon ionization cross sections for atomic oxygen,” Phys. Rev. A 34, 185–198 (1986).
  20. C. Schulz, J. D. Koch, D. F. Davidson, J. B. Jeffries, and R. K. Hanson, “Ultraviolet absorption spectra of shock-heated carbon dioxide and water between 900 and 3050 K,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 355, 82–88 (2002).
  21. N. Georgiev and M. Aldén, “Two-dimensional imaging of flame species using two-photon laser-induced fluorescence,” Appl. Spectrosc. 51, 1229–1237 (1997).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited