Abstract
We believe there is an error in the calculation of the M/# in a previous paper [Appl. Opt. 42, 7008 (2003)]. From the data provided, we calculate an M/# of 3.8 rather than the reported value of 38 for the 1-mm sample tested.
© 2004 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Manuel Ortuño, Sergi Gallego, Celia García, Cristian Neipp, and Inmaculada Pascual
Appl. Opt. 42(35) 7008-7012 (2003)
Manuel Ortuño, Sergi Gallego, Celia García, Cristian Neipp, and Inmaculada Pascual
Appl. Opt. 44(8) 1448-1448 (2005)
Elena Fernández, Celia García, Inmaculada Pascual, Manuel Ortuño, Sergi Gallego, and Augusto Beléndez
Appl. Opt. 45(29) 7661-7666 (2006)