We believe there is an error in the calculation of the M/# in a previous paper [Appl. Opt. 42, 7008 (2003)]. From the data provided, we calculate an M/# of 3.8 rather than the reported value of 38 for the 1-mm sample tested.
© 2004 Optical Society of America
Original Manuscript: December 19, 2003
Revised Manuscript: March 17, 2004
Published: July 10, 2004
Benjamin C. Ihas, Adrian J. Hill, and Melinda Schnoes, "Comment on “Holographic characteristics of a 1-mm-thick photopolymer to be used in holographic memories”," Appl. Opt. 43, 4017-4017 (2004)