OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 43, Iss. 3 — Jan. 20, 2004
  • pp: 608–615

Measurement accuracy in control of segmented-mirror telescopes

Douglas G. MacMartin and Gary Chanan  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 43, Issue 3, pp. 608-615 (2004)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (142 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Design concepts for future large optical telescopes have highly segmented primary mirrors, with the out-of-plane degrees of freedom actively controlled. We estimate the contribution to errors in controlling the primary mirror that results from sensor noise and, in particular, compare mechanical measurements of relative segment motion with optical wave-front information. Data from the Keck telescopes are used to obtain realistic estimates of the achievable noise due to mechanical sensors. On the basis of these estimates, mechanical sensors will be more accurate than wave-front information for any of the telescope design concepts currently under consideration, and therefore supplemental wave-front sensors are not required for real-time figure control. Furthermore, control system errors due to sensor noise will not significantly degrade either seeing-limited or diffraction-limited observations.

© 2004 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.7350) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Wave-front sensing
(110.6770) Imaging systems : Telescopes
(120.6650) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Surface measurements, figure

Original Manuscript: July 5, 2003
Revised Manuscript: September 24, 2003
Published: January 20, 2004

Douglas G. MacMartin and Gary Chanan, "Measurement accuracy in control of segmented-mirror telescopes," Appl. Opt. 43, 608-615 (2004)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. J. Nelson, T. Mast, eds., “Conceptual design for a 30-meter telescope,” CELT Rep. 34 (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif., and University of California, Irvine, Calif., 2002), available at http://celt.ucolick.org .
  2. S. E. Strom, L. Stepp, B. Gregory, “Giant Segmented Mirror Telescope: a point design based on science drivers,” in Future Giant Telescopes, R. Angel, R. Gilmozzi, eds., Proc. SPIE4840, 116–128 (2002). [CrossRef]
  3. T. Andersen, A. Ardeberg, J. Beckers, A. Goncharov, M. Owner-Petersen, H. Riewaldt, R. Snel, D. Walker, “The Euro50 Extremely Large Telescope,” in Future Giant Telescopes, R. Angel, R. Gilmozzi, eds., Proc. SPIE4840, 214–225 (2002). [CrossRef]
  4. P. Dierickx, B. Delabre, L. Noethe, “OWL optical design, active optics, and error budget,” in Optical Design, Materials, Fabrication, and Maintenance, P. Dierickx, ed., Proc. SPIE4003, 203–211 (2000). [CrossRef]
  5. R. C. Jared, A. A. Arthur, S. Andreae, A. Biocca, R. W. Cohen, J. M. Fuertes, J. Franck, G. Gabor, J. Llacer, T. Mast, J. Meng, T. Merrick, R. Minor, J. Nelson, M. Orayani, P. Salz, B. Schaefer, C. Witebsky, “The W. M. Keck Telescope segmented primary mirror active control system,” in Advanced Technology Optical Telescopes IV, L. D. Barr, ed., Proc. SPIE1236, 996–1008 (1990). [CrossRef]
  6. R. Cohen, T. Mast, J. Nelson, “Performance of the W.M. Keck telescope active mirror control system,” in Advanced Technology Optical Telescopes V, L. M. Stepp, ed., Proc. SPIE2199, 105–116 (1994). [CrossRef]
  7. S. Padin, “Wind-induced deformations in a segmented mirror,” Appl. Opt. 41, 2381–2389 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. R. N. Wilson, L. Noethe, “Closed-loop active optics: its advantages and limitations for correction of wind-buffet deformations of large flexible mirrors,” in Active Telescope Systems, F. J. Roddier, ed., Proc. SPIE1114, 290–301 (1989). [CrossRef]
  9. G. Chanan, D. G. MacMartin, J. Nelson, T. Mast, “Control and alignment of segmented-mirror telescopes: matrices, modes, and error propagation,” Appl. Opt. (to be published).
  10. T. Mast, J. Nelson, “Segmented mirror control system hardware for CELT,” in Optical Design, Materials, Fabrication, and Maintenance, P. Dierickx, ed., Proc. SPIE4003, 226–240 (2000). [CrossRef]
  11. D. G. MacMartin, “Control challenges for extremely large telescopes,” in Smart Structures and Materials 2003: Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technology, E. H. Anderson, ed., Proc. SPIE5054, 275–286 (2003). [CrossRef]
  12. D. G. MacMartin, T. S. Mast, G. Chanan, J. E. Nelson, “Active control issues for the California Extremely Large Telescope,” paper AIAA-2001-4035, presented at the Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Montreal, Canada, 6–9 August 2001 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Va., 2001).
  13. S. Padin, W. Davison, “Model of image degradation due to wind buffeting on an extremely large telescope,” Appl. Opt. 42, 592–600 (2004). [CrossRef]
  14. D. G. MacMartin, G. Chanan, “Control of the California Extremely Large Telescope Primary Mirror,” in Future Giant Telescopes, R. Angel, R. Gilmozzi, eds., Proc. SPIE4840, 69–80 (2002). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited