OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 43, Iss. 31 — Nov. 1, 2004
  • pp: 5838–5854

Comparison of SeaWiFS measurements of the Moon with the U.S. Geological Survey lunar model

Robert A. Barnes, Robert E. Eplee, Jr., Frederick S. Patt, Hugh H. Kieffer, Thomas C. Stone, Gerhard Meister, James J. Butler, and Charles R. McClain  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 43, Issue 31, pp. 5838-5854 (2004)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.43.005838


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (343 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The Sea-Viewing Wide-Field-of-View Sensor (SeaWiFS) has made monthly observations of the Moon since 1997. Using 66 monthly measurements, the SeaWiFS calibration team has developed a correction for the instrument’s on-orbit response changes. Concurrently, a lunar irradiance model has been developed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from extensive Earth-based observations of the Moon. The lunar irradiances measured by SeaWiFS are compared with the USGS model. The comparison shows essentially identical response histories for SeaWiFS, with differences from the model of less than 0.05% per thousand days in the long-term trends. From the SeaWiFS experience we have learned that it is important to view the entire lunar image at a constant phase angle from measurement to measurement and to understand, as best as possible, the size of each lunar image. However, a constant phase angle is not required for using the USGS model. With a long-term satellite lunar data set it is possible to determine instrument changes at a quality level approximating that from the USGS lunar model. However, early in a mission, when the dependence on factors such as phase and libration cannot be adequately determined from satellite measurements alone, the USGS model is critical to an understanding of trends in instruments that use the Moon for calibration. This is the case for SeaWiFS.

© 2004 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.0010) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Atmospheric and oceanic optics
(120.0120) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology
(120.0280) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Remote sensing and sensors
(120.5630) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Radiometry

History
Original Manuscript: December 26, 2003
Revised Manuscript: July 12, 2004
Manuscript Accepted: July 27, 2004
Published: November 1, 2004

Citation
Robert A. Barnes, Robert E. Eplee, Frederick S. Patt, Hugh H. Kieffer, Thomas C. Stone, Gerhard Meister, James J. Butler, and Charles R. McClain, "Comparison of SeaWiFS measurements of the Moon with the U.S. Geological Survey lunar model," Appl. Opt. 43, 5838-5854 (2004)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-43-31-5838

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited