OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 44, Iss. 2 — Jan. 10, 2005
  • pp: 241–248

Normalized water-leaving radiance: revisiting the influence of surface roughness

Howard R. Gordon  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 44, Issue 2, pp. 241-248 (2005)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (175 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Many spaceborne sensors have been deployed to image the ocean in the visible portion of the spectrum. Information regarding the concentration of water constituents is contained in the water-leaving radiance—the radiance that is backscattered out of the water and subsequently propagates to the top of the atmosphere. Recognizing that it depends on the viewing and Sun geometry, ways have been sought to normalize this radiance to a single Sun-viewing geometry—forming the normalized water-leaving radiance. This requires understanding both the bidirectional nature of the upwelling radiance just beneath the surface and the interaction of this radiance with the air–water interface. I believe that the latter has been incorrectly computed in the past when a water surface roughened by the wind is considered. The presented computation suggests that, for wind speeds as high as 20 m/s, the influence of surface roughness is small for a wide range of Sun-viewing geometries, i.e., the transmittance of the (whitecap-free) air–water interface is nearly identical (within 0.01) to that for a flat interface.

© 2005 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.4450) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Oceanic optics
(240.5770) Optics at surfaces : Roughness
(280.0280) Remote sensing and sensors : Remote sensing and sensors
(290.4210) Scattering : Multiple scattering

Original Manuscript: July 2, 2004
Manuscript Accepted: August 20, 2004
Published: January 10, 2005

Howard R. Gordon, "Normalized water-leaving radiance: revisiting the influence of surface roughness," Appl. Opt. 44, 241-248 (2005)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. H. R. Gordon, D. K. Clark, “Clear water radiances for atmospheric correction of coastal zone color scanner imagery,” Appl. Opt. 20, 4175–4180 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. H. R. Gordon, O. B. Brown, R. H. Evans, J. W. Brown, R. C. Smith, K. S. Baker, D. K. Clark, “A semi-analytic radiance model of ocean color,” J. Geophys. Res. 93D, 10909–10924 (1988). [CrossRef]
  3. R. W. Austin, “The remote sensing of spectral radiance from below the ocean surface,” in Optical Aspects of Oceanography, N. G. Jerlov, E. S. Nielsen, eds. (Academic, London, 1974), pp. 317–344.
  4. A. Morel, B. Gentili, “Diffuse reflectance of oceanic waters: its dependence on Sun angle as influenced by the molecular scattering contribution,” Appl. Opt. 30, 4427–4438 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. A. Morel, B. Gentili, “Diffuse reflectance of oceanic waters. II. Bidirectional aspects,” Appl. Opt. 32, 6864–6879 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. A. Morel, K. J. Voss, B. Gentili, “Bidirectional reflectance of oceanic waters: a comparison of modeled and measured upward radiance fields,” J. Geophys. Res. 100C, 13143–13150 (1995). [CrossRef]
  7. A. Morel, B. Gentili, “Diffuse reflectance of oceanic waters. III. Implication of bidirectionality for the remote sensing problem,” Appl. Opt. 35, 4850–4862 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. A. Morel, D. Antoine, B. Gentili, “Bidirectional reflectance of oceanic waters: accounting for Raman emission and varying particle scattering phase function,” Appl. Opt. 41, 6289–6306 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. K. M. Case, “Transfer problems and the reciprocity principle,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 651–663 (1957). [CrossRef]
  10. H. Yang, H. R. Gordon, “Remote sensing of ocean color: assessment of the water-leaving radiance bidirectional effects on the atmospheric diffuse transmittance,” Appl. Opt. 36, 7887–7897 (1997). [CrossRef]
  11. C. Cox, W. Munk, “Measurements of the roughness of the sea surface from photographs of the Sun’s glitter,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 44, 838–850 (1954). [CrossRef]
  12. R. W. Preisendorfer, C. D. Mobley, “Albedos and glitter patterns of a wind-roughened sea surface,” J. Phys. Oceanogr. 16, 1293–1316 (1986). [CrossRef]
  13. C. D. Mobley, Light and Water: Radiative Transfer in Natural Waters (Academic, New York, 1994).
  14. V. I. Haltrin, “Algorithm and code to calculate specular reflection of light from a wavy water surface,” in Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Remote Sensing for Marine and Coastal Environments (Veridian, Ann Arbor, Mich., 2002), pp. 1–7.
  15. N. Ebuchi, S. Kizu, “Probability distribution of surface slope derived using sun glitter images from geostationary meteorological satellite and surface vector winds from scatterometers,” J. Oceanogr. 58, 477–486 (2002). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited