OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 44, Iss. 22 — Aug. 1, 2005
  • pp: 4615–4624

Supergridded cone-beam reconstruction and its application to point-spread function calculation

Zikuan Chen and Ruola Ning  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 44, Issue 22, pp. 4615-4624 (2005)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.004615


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1247 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), the volumetric reconstruction may in principle assume an arbitrarily fine grid. The supergridded cone-beam reconstruction refers to reconstructing the object domain or a subvolume thereof with a grid that is finer than the proper computed tomography sampling grid (as determined by gantry geometry and detector discreteness). This technique can naturally reduce the voxelization effect, thereby retaining more details for object reproduction. The grid refinement is usually limited to two or three refinement levels because the detail pursuit is eventually limited by the detector discreteness. The volume reconstruction is usually targeted to a local volume of interest due to the cubic growth in a three-dimensional (3D) array size. As an application, we used this technique for 3D point-spread function (PSF) measurement of a CBCT system by reconstructing edge spread profiles in a refined grid. Through an experiment with a Teflon ball on a CBCT system, we demonstrated the supergridded volume reconstruction (based on a Feldcamp algorithm) and the CBCT PSF measurement (based on an edge-blurring technique). In comparison with a postreconstruction image refinement technique (upsampling and interpolation), the supergridded reconstruction could produce better PSFs (in terms of a smaller FWHM and PSF fitting error).

© 2005 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(110.6880) Imaging systems : Three-dimensional image acquisition
(110.6960) Imaging systems : Tomography

History
Original Manuscript: November 19, 2004
Revised Manuscript: March 8, 2005
Manuscript Accepted: March 10, 2005
Published: August 1, 2005

Citation
Zikuan Chen and Ruola Ning, "Supergridded cone-beam reconstruction and its application to point-spread function calculation," Appl. Opt. 44, 4615-4624 (2005)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-44-22-4615


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. Ning, X. Tang, D. Conover, R. Yu, “Flat panel detector-based cone beam computed tomography with a circle-plus-two arcs data acquisition orbit: preliminary phantom study,” Med. Phys. 30, 1694–1705 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. R. Ning, B. Chen, R. Yu, D. Conover, X. Tang, Y. Ning, “Flat panel detector-based cone-beam volume CT angiography imaging: system evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19, 949–963 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Z. Chen, R. Ning, “Three-dimensional PSF measurement of cone-beam CT system by iterative edge-blurring algorithm,” Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 1865–1880 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. A. K. Jain, Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing (Prentice-Hall, 1989).
  5. Z. Chen, R. Ning, “Pixel-pyramid model for divergent projection geometry,” Opt. Eng. 44, 027002-1-10 (2005). [CrossRef]
  6. Z. Chen, R. Ning, D. Conover, “Accurate perspective projection calculation using a pixel-pyramid model for iterative cone-beam reconstruction,” in Physics of Medical Imaging, M. Yaffe, L. Antonuk, eds., Proc. SPIE5030, 728–739 (2003).
  7. L. A. Feldkamp, L. C. Davis, J. W. Kress, “Practical cone-beam algorithm,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 612–619 (1984). [CrossRef]
  8. A. C. Kak, M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging (IEEE Press, 1987).
  9. X. Yan, R. M. Leahy, “Derivation and analysis of a filtered backprojection algorithm for cone-beam projection data,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 10, 462–472 (1991). [CrossRef]
  10. J. Hsieh, Computed Tomography Principle, Design, Artifacts, Recent Advances, Vol. PM114 of the SPIE Press Monographs (SPIE, 2003).
  11. L. D. Loo, “CT Acceptance testing,” in Specification, Acceptance Testing and Quality Control of Diagnostic X-ray Imaging Equipment, J. A. Seibert, G. T. Barnes, R. G. Gould, eds. (American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 1994).
  12. S. M. Bentzen, “Evaluation of the spatial resolution of a CT scanner by direct analysis of the edge response function,” Med. Phys. 10, 579–581 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. K. Mueller, R. Yagel, J. J. Wheller, “Anti-aliased three-dimensional cone-beam reconstruction of low-contrast objects with algebraic methods,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18, 519–537 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. J. F. Meinel, G. Wang, M. Jiang, T. Frei, M. Vannier, E. Hoffman, “Spatial variation of resolution and noise in multidetector row spiral CT,” Acad. Radiol. 10, 607–613 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Z. Chen, R. Ning, “Pitfalls in cone-beam CT point-spread-function measurement by micro phantom reconstruction,” Opt. Eng. 44, 017002-1-8 (2005). [CrossRef]
  16. I. A. Cunningham, A. Fenster, “A method for modulation transfer function determination from edge profiles with correction for finite element differentiation,” Med. Phys. 14, 533–537 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. J. M. Boone, J. A. Seibert, “An analytic edge spread function model for computer fitting and subsequent calculation of the LSF and MTF,” Med. Phys. 21, 1541–1545 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Z. Chen, R. Ning, “Filling the Radon domain of computed tomography by local convex combination,” Appl. Opt. 42, 7043–7051 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. H. Turbell, “Cone-beam reconstruction using filtered backprojection,” Ph.D. dissertation (Linkopings University, 2001).
  20. Z. Chen, T. Xu, S. Molloi, “Vessel diameter estimation in X-ray image using a watergauge algorithm,” J. Electron. Imaging 12, 724–742 (2003). [CrossRef]
  21. J. C. Lagarias, J. A. Reeds, M. H. Wright, P. E. Wright, “Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions,” SIAM J. Optim. 9, 112–147 (1998). [CrossRef]
  22. Z. Chen, R. Ning, “Breast volume denoising and noise characterization by 3D wavelet transform,” Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 28, 235–246 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited