OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 44, Iss. 25 — Sep. 1, 2005
  • pp: 5292–5303

Information content of multiwavelength lidar data with respect to microphysical particle properties derived from eigenvalue analysis

Igor Veselovskii, Alexei Kolgotin, Detlef Müller, and David N. Whiteman  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 44, Issue 25, pp. 5292-5303 (2005)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.005292


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (323 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The multiwavelength Raman lidar technique in combination with sophisticated inversion algorithms has been recognized as a new tool for deriving information about the microphysical properties of atmospheric aerosols. The input optical parameter sets, provided by respective aerosol Raman lidars, are at the theoretical lower limit at which these inversion algorithms work properly. For that reason there is ongoing intense discussion of the accuracy of these inversion methods and the possibility of simultaneous retrieval of the particle size distribution and the complex refractive index. We present results of the eigenvalue analysis, used to study the information content of multiwavelength lidar data with respect to microphysical particle properties. Such an analysis provides, on a rather mathematical basis, more insight into the limitations of these inversion algorithms regarding the accuracy of the retrieved parameters. We show that the effective radius may be retrieved to 50% accuracy and the real and imaginary part of the complex refractive index to ±0.05 and ±0.005i, if the imaginary part is <0.02i. These results are in accordance with the classic approach of simulation studies with synthetic particle size distributions. Major difficulties are found with a particle effective radius of <0.15 μm. In that case the complex refractive index may not be derived with sufficient accuracy. The eigenvalue analysis also shows that the accuracy of the derived parameters degrades if the imaginary part is >0.02i. Furthermore it shows the importance of the simultaneous use of backscatter and extinction coefficients for the retrieval of microphysical parameters.

© 2005 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.1100) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Aerosol detection
(010.3640) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Lidar
(290.1090) Scattering : Aerosol and cloud effects
(290.5860) Scattering : Scattering, Raman

History
Original Manuscript: December 8, 2004
Revised Manuscript: March 17, 2005
Manuscript Accepted: March 23, 2005
Published: September 1, 2005

Citation
Igor Veselovskii, Alexei Kolgotin, Detlef Müller, and David N. Whiteman, "Information content of multiwavelength lidar data with respect to microphysical particle properties derived from eigenvalue analysis," Appl. Opt. 44, 5292-5303 (2005)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-44-25-5292


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. N. Tikhonov, V. Y. Arsenin, eds., Solution of Ill-Posed Problems (Wiley, 1977).
  2. S. Twomey, eds., Introduction to the Mathematics of Inversion in Remote Sensing and Direct Measurements (Elsevier, 1977).
  3. V. E. Zuev, I. E. Naats, eds., Inverse Problems of Lidar Sensing of the Atmosphere (Springer-Verlag, 1983). [CrossRef]
  4. P. Qing, H. Nakane, Y. Sasano, S. Kitamura, “Numerical simulation of the retrieval of aerosol size distribution from multiwavelength laser radar measurements,” Appl. Opt. 28, 5259–5265 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. D. Müller, U. Wandinger, D. Althausen, I. Mattis, A. Ansmann, “Retrieval of physical particle properties from lidar observations of extinction and backscatter at multiple wavelengths,” Appl. Opt. 37, 2260–2263 (1998). [CrossRef]
  6. D. Müller, U. Wandinger, A. Ansmann, “Microphysical particle parameters from extinction and backscatter lidar data by inversion with regularization: theory,” Appl. Opt. 38, 2346–2357 (1999). [CrossRef]
  7. D. Müller, U. Wandinger, A. Ansmann, “Microphysical particle parameters from extinction and backscatter lidar data by inversion with regularization: simulation,” Appl. Opt. 38, 2358–2368 (1999). [CrossRef]
  8. I. Veselovskii, A. Kolgotin, V. Griaznov, D. Müller, U. Wandinger, D. N. Whiteman, “Inversion with regularization for the retrieval of tropospheric aerosol parameters from multiwavelength lidar sounding,” Appl. Opt. 41, 3685–3699 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. I. Veselovskii, A. Kolgotin, V. Griaznov, D. Müller, K. Franke, D. N. Whiteman, “Inversion of multiwavelength Raman lidar data for retrieval of bimodal aerosol size distribution,” Appl. Opt. 43, 1180–1195 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. C. Böckmann, “Hybrid regularization method for ill-posed inversion of multiwavelength lidar data in the retrieval of aerosol size distributions,” Appl. Opt. 40, 1329–1342 (2001). [CrossRef]
  11. D. Müller, F. Wagner, D. Althausen, U. Wandinger, A. Ansmann, “Physical properties of the Indian aerosol plume derived from six-wavelength lidar observation on 25 March 1999 of the Indian Ocean Experiment,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 1403–1406 (2000). [CrossRef]
  12. D. Althausen, D. Müller, A. Ansmann, U. Wandinger, H. Hube, E. Clauder, S. Zörner, “Scanning 6-wavelength 11-channel aerosol lidar,” J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 17, 1469–1482 (2000). [CrossRef]
  13. I. Mattis, A. Ansmann, D. Müller, U. Wandinger, D. Althausen, “Multiyear aerosol observations with dual-wavelength Raman lidar in the framework of EARLINET,” J. Geophys. Res. 109, D13203, doi: (2004). [CrossRef]
  14. D. Müller, U. Wandinger, D. Althausen, M. Fiebig, “Comprehensive particle characterization from three-wavelength Raman lidar observations: case study,” Appl. Opt. 40, 4863–4869 (2001). [CrossRef]
  15. C. L. Mateer, “On the information content of Umkehr observations,” J. Atmos. Sci. 22, 370–381 (1965). [CrossRef]
  16. A. Ben-David, B. M. Herman, J. Reagan, “Inverse problem and the pseudoempirical orthogonal function method of solution. 1: Theory,” Appl. Opt. 27, 1235–1242 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. D. P. Donovan, A. I. Carswell, “Principal component analysis applied to multiwavelength lidar aerosol backscatter and extinction measurements,” Appl. Opt. 36, 9406–9424 (1997). [CrossRef]
  18. M. J. Post, “A graphical technique for retrieving size distribution parameters from multiple measurements: visualization and error analysis,” J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 13, 863–873 (1996). [CrossRef]
  19. C. F. Bohren, D. R. Huffmann, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley, 1983).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited