OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Glenn D. Boreman
  • Vol. 44, Iss. 30 — Oct. 20, 2005
  • pp: 6345–6352

Neural network-based image reconstruction for positron emission tomography

Partha Pratim Mondal and Kanhirodan Rajan  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 44, Issue 30, pp. 6345-6352 (2005)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.006345


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (591 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) is one of the key molecular imaging modalities in medicine and biology. Penalized iterative image reconstruction algorithms frequently used in PET are based on maximum-likelihood (ML) and maximum a posterior (MAP) estimation techniques. The ML algorithm produces noisy artifacts whereas the MAP algorithm eliminates noisy artifacts by utilizing available prior information in the reconstruction process. The MAP-based algorithms fail to determine the density class in the reconstructed image and hence penalize the pixels irrespective of the density class and irrespective of the strength of interaction between the nearest neighbors. A Hebbian neural learning scheme is proposed to model the nature of interpixel interaction to reconstruct artifact-free edge preserving reconstruction. A key motivation of the proposed approach is to avoid oversmoothing across edges that is often the case with MAP algorithms. It is assumed that local correlation plays a significant role in PET image reconstruction, and proper modeling of correlation weight (which defines the strength of interpixel interaction) is essential to generate artifact-free reconstruction. The Hebbian learning-based approach modifies the interaction weight by adding a small correction that is proportional to the product of the input signal (neighborhood pixels) and output signal. Quantitative analysis shows that the Hebbian learning-based adaptive weight adjustment approach is capable of producing better reconstructed images compared with those reconstructed by conventional ML and MAP-based algorithms in PET image reconstruction.

© 2005 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.6950) Image processing : Tomographic image processing
(170.0170) Medical optics and biotechnology : Medical optics and biotechnology
(170.3880) Medical optics and biotechnology : Medical and biological imaging

ToC Category:
Medical Optics and Biotechnology

Citation
Partha Pratim Mondal and Kanhirodan Rajan, "Neural network-based image reconstruction for positron emission tomography," Appl. Opt. 44, 6345-6352 (2005)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-44-30-6345


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. Y. VardiL. A. Shepp, and L. Kaufmann, “A statistical model for positron emission tomography,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc.  80, 8–37 (1985).
  2. L. A. Shepp and Y. Vardi, “Maximum likelihood estimation for emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging  MI-1, 113–121 (1982).
  3. T. Hebert and R. Leahy, “A generalized EM algorithm for 3-D Bayesian reconstruction from Poisson data using Gibbs priors,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging  MI-8, 194–202 (1989). [CrossRef]
  4. E. Levitan and G. T. Herman, “A maximum a posteriori probability expectation maximization algorithm for image reconstruction in emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging  MI-6, 185–192 (1987).
  5. P. J. Green, “Bayesian reconstruction from emission tomography data using a modified EM algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging  9, 84–93 (1990). [CrossRef]
  6. Z. Zhou, R. M. Leahy, and J. Qi, “Approximate maximum likelihood hyperparameter estimation for Gibbs prior,” IEEE Trans. Image Process.  6, 844–861 (1997). [CrossRef]
  7. T. Hebert and R. Leahy, “Statistic based MAP image reconstruction from Poisson data using Gibbs proirs,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process.  40, 2290–2303 (1992). [CrossRef]
  8. J. Nuyts, D. Bequ, P. Dupont, and L. Mortelmans, “A concave prior penalizing relative differences for maximum-a-posteriori reconstruction in emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.  49, 56–60 (2002). [CrossRef]
  9. H. M. Hudson and R. S. Larkin, “Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging  13, 601–609 (1994). [CrossRef]
  10. L. A. Shepp and B. F. Logan, “The Fourier reconstruction of a head section,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.  NS-21, 21–43 (1974).
  11. J. A. Fessler, “Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for positron emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging  13, 290–300 (1994). [CrossRef]
  12. J. A. Fessler, “Mean and variance of implicitly defined biased estimators such as penalized maximum likelihood: applications to tomography,” IEEE Trans. Image Process.  5, 493–506 (1996). [CrossRef]
  13. C. M. Chen and S. Y. Lee, “Parallelization of the EM algorithm for 3-D PET image reconstruction,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging  10, 513–522 (1991). [CrossRef]
  14. K. Rajan, L. M. Patnaik, and J. Ramakrishna, “High speed computation of the EM algorithm for PET image reconstruction,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.  41, 0–5 (1994). [CrossRef]
  15. J. A. Fessler and A. O. Hero, “Penalized maximum likelihood image reconstructionusing space-alternating generalized EM algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Image Process.  4, 1417–1429 (1995). [CrossRef]
  16. E. U. Mumcuoglu, R. Leahy, S. R. Cherry, and Z. Zhou, “Fast gradient based methods for Bayesian reconstruction of transmission and emission PET images,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging  13, 687–701 (1994). [CrossRef]
  17. S. Alenius and U. Ruotsalainen, “Using local median as the location of prior distribution in iterative emission tomography reconstruction,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.  45, 3097–3104 (1998). [CrossRef]
  18. S. Alenius and U. Ruotsalainen, “Generalization of median root prior reconstruction,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging  21, 1413–1420 (2002). [CrossRef]
  19. P. P. Mondal and K. Rajan, “Image reconstruction by conditional entropy maximisation for PET system,” IEE Proc. Vision Image Signal Process.  151, 345–352 (2004). [CrossRef]
  20. D. Hebb, Organization of Behavior (Wiley, 1949).
  21. E. I. Papageorgiou, C. D. Stylios, and P. P. Groumpos, “Active Hebbian learning algorithm to train fuzzy cognitive maps,” Int. J. Approx Reasoning  37, 219–249 (2004). [CrossRef]
  22. J. Besag, “Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems,” J. R. Stat. Soc. B 36, 192–236 (1974).
  23. P. P. Mondal, “Hebbian learning based image reconstruction for positron emission tomography,” in IEEE Instrumentation and measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Press, 2005).
  24. N. Rajeevan, K. Rajgopal, and G. Krishna, “Vector-extrapolated fast maximum likelihood estimation algorithms for emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging  11, 9–20 (1992). [CrossRef]
  25. L. Kaufmann, “Implementing and accelerating the EM-algorithm for positron emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging  MI-6, 37–51 (1987).
  26. S. J. Lee, “Accelerated deterministic annealing algorithms for transmission CT reconstruction using ordered subsets,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.  49, 2373–2380 (2002).
  27. E. Veclerov and J. Llacer, “Stopping rule for MLE algorithm based on statistical hypothesis testing,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging  MI-6, 313–319 (1987).
  28. D. L. Snyder and M. I. Miller, “The use of sieves to stabilize images produced with the EM-algorithm for emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.  NS-32, 3864–3872 (1985).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited