OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Glenn D. Boreman
  • Vol. 44, Iss. 30 — Oct. 20, 2005
  • pp: 6462–6473

Extension of the graphical technique for estimation of particle size distribution parameters for the consistent intercomparison of diverse sets of multiwavelength lidar derived optical coefficients

Benjamin R. Herman, Barry Gross, Fred Moshary, and Samir Ahmed  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 44, Issue 30, pp. 6462-6473 (2005)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.006462


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1331 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In applying the graphical technique to the estimation of the particle size distribution (PSD) parameters, determination of proper bounds surrounding the solution space for a particular confidence level is essential to the consistent intercomparison of diverse multiwavelength lidar optical data sets. The graphical technique utilizes ratios of backscatter and/or extinction coefficients, and it is shown that if the correlation between ratios is not taken into account in calculating the error bounds, the solution space will be overestimated, resulting in relatively larger discrepancies for a larger number of optical coefficients. A method for correcting the bounds, to account for the correlation is developed for various numbers of wavelengths. These improved bounds are then applied, for the case of a monomodal lognormal PSD, with an assumed refractive index, to assess the role additional Raman extinction channels play in improving retrieval capability of a typical three-channel backscatter lidar (1064, 532, and 355 nm) under varying noise levels. Applying the same formalism to underlying bimodal distributions of coarse and fine particles can result in false monomodal solutions. However, when both Raman optical extinction channels are available, no solution is obtained. This can potentially serve as a quick and simple method, prior to a more complex regularization analysis, to differentiate between cases in which the fine mode is dominant versus the cases in which the contribution from the coarse mode is significant.

© 2005 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(280.0280) Remote sensing and sensors : Remote sensing and sensors
(280.1100) Remote sensing and sensors : Aerosol detection
(280.3640) Remote sensing and sensors : Lidar

ToC Category:
Remote Sensing

Citation
Benjamin R. Herman, Barry Gross, Fred Moshary, and Samir Ahmed, "Extension of the graphical technique for estimation of particle size distribution parameters for the consistent intercomparison of diverse sets of multiwavelength lidar derived optical coefficients," Appl. Opt. 44, 6462-6473 (2005)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-44-30-6462


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. O. Dubovik and M. D. King, A flexible inversion algorithm for retrieval of aerosol optical properties from Sun and sky radiance measurements, J. Geophys. Res.  105, 20673–20696 (2000). [CrossRef]
  2. C. W Groetsch, The Theory of Tikhonov Regularization for Fredholm Equations of the First Kind (Pitman, 1984).
  3. K. S. Shifrin, “Simple relationships for the Ångstrom parameter of disperse systems,” Appl. Opt.  34, 4480–4485 (1995).
  4. N. T. O'Neill, O. Dubovik, and T. F. Eck, “Modified Ångstrom exponent for the characterization of submicrometer aerosols,” Appl. Opt.  40, 2368–2375 (2001).
  5. D. Althausen, D. Muller, A. Ansmann, U. Wandinger, H. Hube, E. Clauder, and S. Zorner, “Scanning six-wavelength 11-channel aerosol lidar,” J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol.  17, 1469–1482 (2000). [CrossRef]
  6. C. Bockmann, “Hybrid regularization method for the ill-posed inversion of multiwavelength lidar data in the retrieval of aerosol size distributions,” Appl. Opt.  40, 1329–1342 (2001).
  7. D. Mueller, U. Wandinger, D. Althausen, and M. Fiebig, “Comprehensive particle characterization from three-wavelength Raman-Lidar observations: case study,” Appl. Opt.  40, 4863–4869 (2001).
  8. I. Veselovskii, A. Kolgotin, V. Griaznov, D. Muller, U. Wandinger, and D. N. Whiteman, “Inversion with regularization for the retrieval of tropospheric aerosol parameters from multiwavelength lidar sounding,” Appl. Opt.  41, 3685–3699 (2002).
  9. I. Veselovskii, A. Kolgotin, V. Griaznov, D. Muller, U. Wandinger, and D. N. Whiteman, “Inversion of multiwavelength Raman lidar data for retrieval of bimodal aerosol size distribution,” Appl. Opt.  43, 1180–1195 (2004). [CrossRef]
  10. G. Beyerle, R. Neuber, O. Schrems, F. Wittrock, and B. Knudsen, “Multiwavelength lidar measurements of stratospheric aerosols above Spitsbergen during winter 1992/93,” Geophys. Res. Lett.  21, 57–60 (1994). [CrossRef]
  11. G. K. Yue, J. Lu, V. A. Mohnen, P.-H. Wang, V. K. Saxana, and J. Anderson, “Retrieving aerosol optical properties from moments of the particle size distribution,” Geophys. Res. Lett.  24, 651–654 (1997). [CrossRef]
  12. G. K. Yue, “Retrieval of stratospheric aerosol size distributions and integral properties from simulated lidar backscatter measurements,” Appl. Opt.  39, 5446–5455 (2000).
  13. P-H. Wang, M. P. McCormick, T. J. Swissler, M. T. Osborn, W. H. Fuller, and G. K. Yue, “Inference of stratospheric aerosol composition and size distribution from SAGE II Satellite measurements,” J. Geophys. Res.  94, 8435–8446 (1989).
  14. P. S. S. Devara, P. Ernest Raj, and G. Pandithurai “Aerosol-profile measurements in the lower troposphere with four-wavelength bistatic argon-ion lidar,” Appl. Opt.  34, 4416–4425 (1995).
  15. Numerical Recipes: The art of Scientific Computing, W. H. Press (ed.), section 15.6 (Cambridge U. Press, 2002).
  16. M. D. Post, “A graphical technique for retrieving size distribution parameters from multiple measurements: visualization and error analysis,” J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.  13, 863–869 (1996). [CrossRef]
  17. C. Dellago and H. Horvath, “On the accuracy of the size distribution information obtained from light extinction and scattering measurements I Basic considerations and models,” J. Aerosol Sci.  24, 129–142 (1993). [CrossRef]
  18. A. Papoulius, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, (McGraw-Hill 1991), Sec. 6.2.
  19. O. Dubovik, B. N. Holben, T. F. Eck, A. Smirnov, Y. J. Kaufman, M. D. King, D. Tanre, and I. Slutsker, “Variability of absorption and optical properties of key aerosol types observed in worldwide locations,” J Atmos. Sci. 59, 590–608 (2002).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited