OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: James C. Wyant
  • Vol. 46, Iss. 24 — Aug. 20, 2007
  • pp: 6055–6063

Approach for reconstructing anisoplanatic adaptive optics images

Mathieu Aubailly, Michael C. Roggemann, and Timothy J. Schulz  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 46, Issue 24, pp. 6055-6063 (2007)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.46.006055


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1452 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Atmospheric turbulence corrupts astronomical images formed by ground-based telescopes. Adaptive optics systems allow the effects of turbulence-induced aberrations to be reduced for a narrow field of view corresponding approximately to the isoplanatic angle θ 0 . For field angles larger than θ 0 , the point spread function (PSF) gradually degrades as the field angle increases. We present a technique to estimate the PSF of an adaptive optics telescope as function of the field angle, and use this information in a space-varying image reconstruction technique. Simulated anisoplanatic intensity images of a star field are reconstructed by means of a block-processing method using the predicted local PSF. Two methods for image recovery are used: matrix inversion with Tikhonov regularization, and the Lucy–Richardson algorithm. Image reconstruction results obtained using the space-varying predicted PSF are compared to space invariant deconvolution results obtained using the on-axis PSF. The anisoplanatic reconstruction technique using the predicted PSF provides a significant improvement of the mean squared error between the reconstructed image and the object compared to the deconvolution performed using the on-axis PSF.

© 2007 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.1080) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Active or adaptive optics
(100.3010) Image processing : Image reconstruction techniques
(110.6770) Imaging systems : Telescopes

ToC Category:
Image Processing

History
Original Manuscript: April 2, 2007
Manuscript Accepted: June 13, 2007
Published: August 10, 2007

Citation
Mathieu Aubailly, Michael C. Roggemann, and Timothy J. Schulz, "Approach for reconstructing anisoplanatic adaptive optics images," Appl. Opt. 46, 6055-6063 (2007)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-46-24-6055


Sort:  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. M. C. Roggemann and B. Welsh, Imaging Through Turbulence (CRC, 1996).
  2. M. C. Roggemann, B. M. Welsh, and R. Q. Fugate, "Improving the resolution of ground-based telescopes," Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 437-505 (1997). [CrossRef]
  3. K. Tyson, Principles of Adaptive Optics, 2nd ed. (Academic, 1997).
  4. D. L. Fried, "Anisoplanatism in adaptive optics," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 52-61 (1982). [CrossRef]
  5. J. Christou, E. Steinbring, S. Faber, D. Gavel, J. Patience, and E. Gates, "Anisoplanatism within the isoplanatic patch," Am. Astron. Soc. 34, 1257 (2002).
  6. D. C. Johnston and B. M. Welsh, "Analysis of multiconjugate adaptive optics," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 394-408 (1994). [CrossRef]
  7. B. L. Ellerbroek, "First-order performance evaluation of adaptive optics systems for atmospheric turbulence compensation in extended field of view astronomical telescopes," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 783-805 (1994). [CrossRef]
  8. T. Fusco, J.-M. Conan, G. Rousset, L. M. Mugnier, and V. Michau, "Optimal wavefront reconstruction strategies for multiconjugate adaptive optics," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2527-2538 (2001). [CrossRef]
  9. M. Owner-Petersen and A. Goncharov, "Multiconjugate adaptive optics for large telescopes: analytical control of the mirror shapes," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 19, 537-548 (2002). [CrossRef]
  10. A. N. Tikhonov, A. V. Goncharsky, V. Stepanov, and A. G. Yagola, Numerical Methods for the Solution of Ill-Posed Problems (Kluwer Academic, 1995).
  11. W. H. Richardson, "Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 55-59 (1972). [CrossRef]
  12. A. Abu-Naser, N. P. Galatsanos, and M. N. Wernick, "Object recognition based on impulse restoration with use of the expectation-maximization algorithm," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2327-2340 (1998). [CrossRef]
  13. T. Holmes, "Expectation-maximization restoration of band-limited, truncated point-process intensities with application in microscopy," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 1006-1014 (1989). [CrossRef]
  14. G. Cochran, "Phase screen generation," Tech. Rep. TR-663 (The Optical Sciences Company, Placentia, California, 1985).
  15. T. J. Brennan and P. H. Roberts, "AOTOOLs: the Adaptive Optics Toolbox" (Optical Sciences Company, Anaheim, California, 1999).
  16. J. W. Goodman, Introduction To Fourier Optics, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, 1996).
  17. M. C. Roggemann and T. J. Schulz, "Algorithm to increase the largest aberration which can be reconstructed from hartmann sensor measurements," Appl. Opt. 37, 4321-4329 (1998). [CrossRef]
  18. M. C. Roggemann, T. J. Shulz, C. W. Ngai, and J. T. Kraft, "Joint processing of Hartmann sensor and conventional image measurements to estimate large aberrations: theory and experimental results," Appl. Opt. 38, 2249-2255 (1999). [CrossRef]
  19. J. M. Martin and S. M. Flatte, "Simulation of point-source scintillation through three-dimentional random media," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 838-847 (1990). [CrossRef]
  20. S. E. Troxel, B. M. Welsch, and M. C. Roggemann, "Off-axis optical transfer function calculations in an adaptive-optics system by means of a diffraction calculation for weak index fluctuations," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 2100-2111 (1994). [CrossRef]
  21. J. M. Martin and S. M. Flatte, "Intensity images and statistics from numerical simulation of wave propagation in 3-d random media," Appl. Opt. 27, 2111-2126 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. M. C. Roggemann and D. J. Lee, "Two-deformable-mirror concept for correcting scintillation effects in laser beam projection through the turbulent atmosphere," Appl. Opt. 37, 4577-4585 (1998). [CrossRef]
  23. M. Aubailly and M. C. Roggemann, "Block-processing method for post-detection correction of anisoplanatic image detects in astronomical adaptive optics images," in 2005 AMOS Technical Conference, P. W. Kervin and J. L. Africano, eds. (Maui Economic Development Board Publications, 2005), pp. 131-137.
  24. R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, 2nd ed. (Prentice-Hall, 2002).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited