OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: James C. Wyant
  • Vol. 46, Iss. 4 — Feb. 1, 2007
  • pp: 463–471

Ultrathin cameras using annular folded optics

Eric J. Tremblay, Ronald A. Stack, Rick L. Morrison, and Joseph E. Ford  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 46, Issue 4, pp. 463-471 (2007)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.46.000463


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1149 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We present a reflective multiple-fold approach to visible imaging for high-resolution, large aperture cameras of significantly reduced thickness. This approach allows for reduced bulk and weight compared with large high-quality camera systems and improved resolution and light collection compared with miniature conventional cameras. An analysis of the properties of multiple-fold imagers is presented along with the design, fabrication, and testing of an eightfold prototype camera. This demonstration camera has a 35 m m effective focal length, 0.7 NA, and 27 m m effective aperture folded into a 5 m m total thickness.

© 2007 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(080.3620) Geometric optics : Lens system design
(100.2000) Image processing : Digital image processing
(110.0110) Imaging systems : Imaging systems

ToC Category:
Geometrical optics

History
Original Manuscript: June 13, 2006
Revised Manuscript: September 19, 2006
Manuscript Accepted: September 21, 2006

Citation
Eric J. Tremblay, Ronald A. Stack, Rick L. Morrison, and Joseph E. Ford, "Ultrathin cameras using annular folded optics," Appl. Opt. 46, 463-471 (2007)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-46-4-463


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. M. Laikin, Lens Design (Dekker, 2001), Chap. 15.
  2. V. Draganov and D. G. James, "Compact telescope for free-space communications," in Current Developments in Lens Design and Optical Engineering III, R. E. Fischer, W. J. Smith, and R. B. Johnson, eds., Proc. SPIE 4767, 151-158 (2002). [CrossRef]
  3. E. J. Tremblay, J. Rutkowski, I. Tamayo, R. A. Stack, R. L. Morrison, D. Combs, J. Mader, H.-C. Kim, U. Levy, Y. Fainman, and J. E. Ford, "Ultrathin folded imager," in OSA Topical Meeting on Computational Optical Sensing and Imaging (Optical Society of America, 2005).
  4. W. Kordonski, A. Shorey, and A. Sekeres, "New magnetically assisted finishing method: material removal with magnetorheological fluid jet," in Optical Manufacturing and Testing, V. H. P. Stahl, ed., Proc. SPIE 5180, 107-114 (2003).
  5. E. R. Dowski and W. T. Cathey, "Extended depth of field through wavefront coding," Appl. Opt. 34, 1859-1866 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. E. L. O'Neill, "Transfer function for an annular aperture," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46, 285-288 (1956). [CrossRef]
  7. V. N. Mahajan, "Imaging with obscured pupils," Opt. Lett. 1, 128-129 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. J. E. Harvey and C. Ftaclas, "Diffraction effects of telescope secondary mirror spiders on various image-quality criteria," Appl. Opt. 34, 6337-6349 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (McGraw-Hill, 1968), pp. 61-113.
  10. A. Rosenfeld and A. C. Kak, Digital Picture Processing (Academic, 1982), Vol. 1, pp. 276-281.
  11. M. W. Haney, "Performance scaling in flat imagers," Appl. Opt. 45, 2901-2910 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. P. B. Catrysse and B. A. Wandell, "Optical efficiency of image sensor pixels," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 1610-1620 (2002). [CrossRef]
  13. G. Agranov, V. Berezin, and R. H. Tsai, "Cross talk and microlens study in a color CMOS image sensor," IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 50, 4-11 (2003). [CrossRef]
  14. J. Adkisson, J. Gambino, T. Hoague, M. Jaffe, J. Kyan, R. Leidy, D. McGrath, R. Rassel, D. Sackett, and C. V. Stancampiano, "Optimization of Cu interconnect layers for 2.7 μm pixel image sensor technology: fabrication, modeling, and optical results." in Proceedings of 2005 IEEE Workshop on CCD and Advanced Image Sensors (IEEE, 2005), pp. 1-4.
  15. J. Janesick, "Lux transfer: complimentary metal oxide semiconductors versus charge-coupled devices," Opt. Eng. 41, 1203-1215 (2002). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited