OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Editor: James C. Wyant
  • Vol. 47, Iss. 1 — Jan. 1, 2008
  • pp: 56–63

Sensitivity study of two high-throughput resolution metrics for photoresists

Christopher N. Anderson and Patrick P. Naulleau  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 47, Issue 1, pp. 56-63 (2008)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1193 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The resolution of chemically amplified resists is becoming an increasing concern, especially for lithography in the extreme ultraviolet (EUV) regime. Large-scale screening is currently under way to identify resist platforms that can support the demanding specifications required for EUV lithography. Current screeningprocesses would benefit from the development of metrics that can objectively quantify resist resolution in a high-throughput fashion. Here we examine two high-throughput metrics for resist resolution determination. After summarizing their details and justifying their utility, we characterize the sensitivity of both metrics to known uncertainties in exposure tool aberrations and focus control. For an implementation at EUV wavelengths, wereportaberration and focus-limited error bars in extracted resolution of 1.25   nm rms for both metrics, making them attractive candidates for future screening and downselection efforts.

© 2008 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(070.0070) Fourier optics and signal processing : Fourier optics and signal processing
(100.3190) Image processing : Inverse problems
(110.3960) Imaging systems : Microlithography

ToC Category:
Imaging Systems

Original Manuscript: September 5, 2007
Revised Manuscript: November 8, 2007
Manuscript Accepted: November 9, 2007
Published: December 20, 2007

Christopher N. Anderson and Patrick P. Naulleau, "Sensitivity study of two high-throughput resolution metrics for photoresists," Appl. Opt. 47, 56-63 (2008)

Sort:  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. S. Wurm, "EUV lithography development in the United States," presented at the Fourth International EUV Lithography Symposium, San Diego, Calif., 7-9 November 2005, proceedings available from SEMATECH, Austin, Tex.
  2. S. Wurm, "EUV lithography update," presented at the Fifth International Symposium on EUV Lithography, Barcelona, Spain, 15-18 October 2006, proceedings available from SEMATECH, Austin, Tex.
  3. G. M. Schmid, M. D. Stewart, C. Wang, B. D. Vogt, M. Vivek, E. K. Lin, and C. G. Willson, "Resolution limitations in chemically amplified photoresist systems," Proc. SPIE 5376, 333-342 (2004).
  4. G. F. Lorusso, P. Leunissen, M. Ercken, C. Delvaux, F. V. Roey, and N. Vandenbroeck, "Spectral analysis of line width roughness and its applications to immersion lithography," J. Microlithogr., Microfab., Microsyst. 5, 033003 (2006).
  5. P. Naulleau and C. Anderson, "Lithographic metrics for the determination of intrinsic resolution limits in EUV resists," Proc. SPIE 6517, 65172N (2007).
  6. J. Hoffnagle, W. D. Hinsberg, F. A. Houle, and M. I. Sanchez, "Characterization of photoresist spatial resolution by interferometric lithography," Proc. SPIE 5038, 464-472 (2003).
  7. T. Brunner, C. Fonseca, N. Seong, and M. Burkhardt, "Impact of resist blur on MEF, OPC, and PD control," Proc. SPIE 5377, 141-149 (2004).
  8. P. Dirksen, J. Braat, A. J. E. M. Janssen, A. Leeuwestein, H. Kwinten, and D. Van Steenwinckel, "Determination of resist parameters using the extended Nijboer-Zernike theory," Proc. SPIE 5377, 150-159 (2004).
  9. R. Jones and J. Byers, "Theoretical corner rounding analysis and mask writer simulation," Proc. SPIE 5040, 1035-1043 (2003).
  10. C. Ahn, H. Kim, and K. Baik, "Novel approximate model for resist process," Proc. SPIE 3334, 752-763 (1998).
  11. P. Naulleau, "Status of EUV micro-exposure capabilities at the ALS using the 0.3-NA MET optic," Proc. SPIE 5374, 881-891 (2004).
  12. K. Goldberg, P. Naulleau, P. Denham, S. Rekawa, K. Jackson, E. Anderson, and J. A. Liddle, "At-wavelength alignment and testing of the 0.3 NA MET optic," J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 22, 2956-2961 (2004).
  13. As an external control, all experimental and modeling corner data are taken at and around the dose where the coded 100 nm features print at 100 nm.
  14. Note that commercial modeling packages such as prolith and solid e could also be used.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited