OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Editor: James C. Wyant
  • Vol. 47, Iss. 19 — Jul. 1, 2008
  • pp: 3535–3542

Signal-to-noise based local decorrelation compensation for speckle interferometry applications

Jérôme Molimard, Raul Cordero, and Alain Vautrin  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 47, Issue 19, pp. 3535-3542 (2008)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (6532 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Speckle-based interferometric techniques allow assessing the whole-field deformation induced on a specimen due to the application of load. These high sensitivity optical techniques yield fringe images generated by subtracting speckle patterns captured while the specimen undergoes deformation. The quality of the fringes, and in turn the accuracy of the deformation measurements, strongly depends on the speckle correlation. Specimen rigid body motion leads to speckle decorrelation that, in general, cannot be effectively counteracted by applying a global translation to the involved speckle patterns. In this paper, we propose a recorrelation procedure based on the application of locally evaluated translations. The proposed procedure implies dividing the field into several regions, applying a local translation, and calculating, in every region, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Since the latter is a correlation indicator (the noise increases with the decorrelation) we argue that the proper translation is that which maximizes the locally evaluated SNR. The search of the proper local translations is, of course, an interactive process that can be facilitated by using a SNR optimization algorithm. The performance of the proposed recorrelation procedure was tested on two examples. First, the SNR optimization algorithm was applied to fringe images obtained by subtracting simulated speckle patterns. Next, it was applied to fringe images obtained by using a shearography optical setup from a specimen subjected to mechanical deformation. Our results show that the proposed SNR optimization method can significantly improve the reliability of measurements performed by using speckle-based techniques.

© 2008 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(120.3180) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Interferometry
(120.6165) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Speckle interferometry, metrology

ToC Category:
Instrumentation, Measurement, and Metrology

Original Manuscript: February 19, 2008
Revised Manuscript: May 30, 2008
Manuscript Accepted: May 30, 2008
Published: June 27, 2008

Jérôme Molimard, Raul Cordero, and Alain Vautrin, "Signal-to-noise based local decorrelation compensation for speckle interferometry applications," Appl. Opt. 47, 3535-3542 (2008)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. M. Brunet, S. Touchal, and F. Morestin, “Numerical and experimental analysis of necking in 3D. Sheet forming processes using damage variable,” in Advanced Methods in Materials Processing Defects, M. Predeleanu and P. Gilormini, eds. (Elsevier, 1997), pp. 205-214. [CrossRef]
  2. J. Rethore, S. Roux, and F. Hild, “Noise-robust stress intensity factor determination from kinematic field measurements,” in Engineering Fracture Mechanics (Science Direct, 2007).
  3. H. A. Aebischer and S. Waldner, “Strain distributions made visible with image-shearing speckle pattern interferometry,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 26407-420 (1997). [CrossRef]
  4. J. R. Lee, J. Molimard, A. Vautrin, and Y. Surrel, “Digital phase-shifting grating shearography for experimental analysis of fabric composites under tension,” Composites Part A 35, 849-859 (2004). [CrossRef]
  5. J. Molimard, D. Bounda, and A. Vautrin, “Quantitative strain and slope evaluation on a double lap joint tensile test using ESPSI,” Proc. SPIE 634163412R-1 (2006).
  6. P. K. Rastogi, P. Jacquot, and L. Pflug, “Holographic interferometry at LSA: Some selected examples of its application,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 1367-77 (1990). [CrossRef]
  7. R. R. Cordero and F. Labbe, “Monitoring the strain-rate progression of an aluminium sample undergoing tensile deformation by electronic speckle-pattern interferometry (ESPI),” J. Phys. D 39, 2419-2426 (2006). [CrossRef]
  8. A. Martinez, J. A. Rayas, R. R. Cordero, and K. Genovese, “Analysis of optical configurations for electronic speckle-pattern interferometry (ESPI),” Opt. Lasers Eng. 46, 48-54 (2008). [CrossRef]
  9. D. Post, B. Han, and P. Ifju, High Sensitivity Moiré: Experimental Analysis for Mechanics and Materials (Springer-Verlag, 1994). [CrossRef]
  10. B. Han, D. Post, and P. Ifju, “Moiré interferometry for engineering mechanics: current practices and future developments,” J. Strain Anal. 36, 101-117 (2001). [CrossRef]
  11. R. R. Cordero, M. François, I. Lira, and C. Vial-Edwards, “Whole-Field Analysis of Uniaxial Tensile Tests by Moiré Interferometry,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 43, 919-936 (2005). [CrossRef]
  12. R. Cordero, A. Martínez, R. Rodríguez-Vera, and P. Roth, “Uncertainty evaluation of displacements measured by electronic speckle-pattern interferometry,” Opt. Commun. 241, 279-292(2004). [CrossRef]
  13. A. Martínez, R. Cordero, J. A. Rayas, H. J. Puga, and R. Rodríguez-Vera, “Uncertainty analysis of displacement measured by in-plane ESPI with spherical wavefronts,” Appl. Opt. 44, 1141-1149 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. R. Cordero and F. Labbé, “Uncertainty evaluation of out-of-plane displacements measured by electronic speckle-pattern interferometry (ESPI),” Meas. Sci. Technol. 16, 2365-2374(2005). [CrossRef]
  15. R. Cordero and F. Labbé, “Uncertainty evaluation of displacement gradients measured by electronic speckle pattern shearing interferometry (ESPSI),” Meas. Sci. Technol. 161315-1321 (2005). [CrossRef]
  16. G. Cloud, Optical Methods in Engineering Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 1995). [CrossRef]
  17. K. Creath, “Phase measurement interferometry techniques,” Prog. Opt. 26, 350-393 (1998).
  18. H. P. Stahl, “Review of phase-measuring interferometry,” Proc SPIE 1332, 704-719 (1991). [CrossRef]
  19. H. J. Tiziani, “Optical methods for precision measurements,” Opt. Quantum Electron. 21253-282 (1989). [CrossRef]
  20. P. Carré, “Installation et utilisation du comparateur photoélectrique et interférentiel du bureau international des poids et mesures,” Metrologia 2, 13-23 (1996). [CrossRef]
  21. J. Schwider, R. Burow, K. E. Elssner, J. Grzanna, R. Spolaczyk, and K. Merkel, “Digital wave-front measuring interferometry: some systematic error sources” Appl. Opt. 22, 3421 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. J. Novak, “Five-step phase-shifting algorithms with unknown values of phase shift,” Optik (Jena) 114, 63-68 (2003). [CrossRef]
  23. J. M. Huntley, “Automated analysis of speckle interferograms,” in ,i>Digital Speckle Pattern Interferometry and Related Techniques, P. K. Rastogi, ed. (Wiley, 2001).
  24. Y. Surrel, “Phase stepping: a new self-calibrating algorithm,” Appl. Opt. 32, 3598-3600 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Y. Surrel, “Design of algorithms for phase measurements by the use of phase stepping,” Appl. Opt. 3551 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. A. Dobroiu, D. Apostol, V. Nascov, and V. Damian, “Self-calibrating algorithm for three-sample phase-shift interferometry by contrast levelling,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 9744-750(1998). [CrossRef]
  27. R. R. Cordero and I. Lira, “Uncertainty analysis of displacements measured by phase-shifting moiré interferometry,” Opt. Commun. 237, 25-36 (2004). [CrossRef]
  28. P. J. de Groot and L. L. Deck, “Numerical simulations of vibration in phase-shifting interferometry,” Appl. Opt. 35, 2172-2178 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. J. M. Huntley, “Suppression of phase errors from vibration in phase-shifting interferometry,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2233-2241 (1998). [CrossRef]
  30. B. Zhao, “Effect of intensity-correlated error due to quantization and noise on phase-shifting method,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 28, 199-211 (1997). [CrossRef]
  31. B. Zhao and Y. Surrel, “Effect of quantization error on the computed phase of phase-shifting measurements,” Appl. Opt. 36, 2070-2075 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Y. Surrel, “Additive noise effect in digital phase detection,” Appl. Opt. 36, 271-276 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. R. R. Cordero, J. Molimard, A. Martınez, and F. Labbe, “Uncertainty analysis of temporal phase-stepping algorithms for interferometry,” Opt. Commun. 275144-155 (2007). [CrossRef]
  34. L. Bruno, L. Pagnotta, and A. Poggialini, “Laser speckle decorrelation in NDT,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 34, 55-65 (2000). [CrossRef]
  35. A. Davila, J. M. Huntley, G. H. Kaufmann, and D. Kerr, “High-speed dynamic speckle interferometry: phase errors due to intensity, velocity, and speckle decorrelation,” Appl. Opt. , 44, 3954-3962 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Y. Y. Hung, J. Q. Wang, and J. D. Hovanesian, “Technique for compensating excessive rigid body motion in nondestructive testing of large structures using shearography,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 26, 249-250 (1997). [CrossRef]
  37. R. A. Martınez-Celorio, B. Barrientos, F. J. Sanchez-Marın, L. M. Lopez, and J. A. Rayas, “Out-of-plane displacement measurement by electronic speckle pattern interferometry in presence of large in-plane displacement,” Opt. Commun. 208, 17-24 (2002). [CrossRef]
  38. S. Equis and P. Jacquot, “Simulation of speckle complex amplitude: advocating the linear model,” Proc. SPIE 6341, 634136-1 (2006).
  39. Y. Surrel, “Moiré and grid methods in optics,” Proc. SPIE 2342, 213-220 (1994).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited