OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: James C. Wyant
  • Vol. 47, Iss. 20 — Jul. 10, 2008
  • pp: 3619–3630

Modeling of nonphase mechanisms in ultrasonic modulation of light propagation

Quan Liu, Stephen Norton, and Tuan Vo-Dinh  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 47, Issue 20, pp. 3619-3630 (2008)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.47.003619


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (2595 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

While phase variation due to ultrasonic modulation of coherent light has been extensively studied in acousto-optical imaging, fewer groups have studied nonphase mechanisms of ultrasonic modulation, which may be important in exploring ultrasonic modulation of incoherent light for imaging. We have developed a versatile Monte Carlo based method that can model not only phase variation due to refractive index changes and scatterer displacement in tissue or tissue-like phantoms, but also amplitude and exit location variations due to the changes in optical properties and refractive index under ultrasonic modulation, in which the exit location variation has not, to the best of our knowledge, been modeled previously. Our results show that the modulation depth due to the exit location variation is three orders of magnitude higher than that due to amplitude variation, but two to three orders of magnitude lower than that due to phase variation for monochromatic light. Furthermore it is found that the modulation depth in reflectance due to the exit location variation is larger than that in transmittance for small source-detector separations.

© 2008 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(000.4430) General : Numerical approximation and analysis
(110.7170) Imaging systems : Ultrasound
(170.3660) Medical optics and biotechnology : Light propagation in tissues
(290.1350) Scattering : Backscattering
(290.4210) Scattering : Multiple scattering
(290.7050) Scattering : Turbid media

ToC Category:
Scattering

History
Original Manuscript: September 13, 2007
Revised Manuscript: June 5, 2008
Manuscript Accepted: June 6, 2008
Published: July 7, 2008

Virtual Issues
Vol. 3, Iss. 8 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Quan Liu, Stephen Norton, and Tuan Vo-Dinh, "Modeling of nonphase mechanisms in ultrasonic modulation of light propagation," Appl. Opt. 47, 3619-3630 (2008)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-47-20-3619


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. L. V. Wang, “Ultrasound-mediated biophotonic imaging: a review of acousto-optical tomography and photo-acoustic tomography,” Dis. Markers 19, 123-138 (2003).
  2. W. Leutz and G. Maret, “Ultrasonic modulation of multiply scattered light,” Physica B 204, 14-19 (1995). [CrossRef]
  3. S. Sakadzic and L. V. Wang, “Modulation of multiply scattered coherent light by ultrasonic pulses: an analytical model,” Phys. Rev. E 72, 036620 (2005). [CrossRef]
  4. S. Sakadzic and L. V. Wang, “Ultrasonic modulation of multiply scattered coherent light: an analytical model for anisotropically scattering media,” Phys. Rev. E 66, 026603 (2002). [CrossRef]
  5. L. V. Wang, “Mechanisms of ultrasonic modulation of multiply scattered coherent light: a Monte Carlo model,” Opt. Lett. 26, 1191-1193 (2001). [CrossRef]
  6. M. Kempe, M. Larionov, D. Zaslavsky, and A. Z. Genack, “Acousto-optic tomography with multiply scattered light,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 1151-1158 (1997). [CrossRef]
  7. A. Lev and B. Sfez, “In vivo demonstration of the ultrasound-modulated light technique,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 2347-2354(2003). [CrossRef]
  8. S. Sakadzic and L. V. Wang, “High-resolution ultrasound-modulated optical tomography in biological tissues,” Opt. Lett. 29, 2770-2772 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. A. Lev and B. G. Sfez, “Direct, noninvasive detection of photon density in turbid media,” Opt. Lett. 27, 473-475 (2002). [CrossRef]
  10. S. Leveque-Fort, J. Selb, L. Pottier, and A. C. Boccara, “In situ local tissue characterization and imaging by backscattering acousto-optic imaging,” Opt. Commun. 196, 127-131 (2001). [CrossRef]
  11. Y. Gang, J. Shuliang, and L. V. Wang, “Frequency-swept ultrasound-modulated optical tomography in biological tissue by use of parallel detection,” Opt. Lett. 25, 734-736 (2000). [CrossRef]
  12. L. Sui, R. A. Roy, C. A. DiMarzio, and T. W. Murray, “Imaging in diffuse media with pulsed-ultrasound-modulated light and the photorefractive effect,” Appl. Opt. 44, 4041-4048 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. M. Atlan, B. C. Forget, F. Ramaz, A. C. Boccara, and M. Gross, “Pulsed acousto-optic imaging in dynamic scattering media with heterodyne parallel speckle detection,” Opt. Lett. 30, 1360-1362 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. G. D. Mahan, W. E. Engler, J. J. Tiemann, and E. Uzgiris, “Ultrasonic tagging of light: theory,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14015-14019 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. E. Granot, A. Lev, Z. Kotler, B. G. Sfez, and H. Taitelbaum, “Detection of inhomogeneities with ultrasound tagging of light,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 1962-1967 (2001). [CrossRef]
  16. K. B. Krishnan, P. Fomitchov, S. J. Lomnes, M. Kollegal, and F. P. Jansen, “A theory for the ultrasonic modulation of incoherent light in turbid medium,” in Optical Methods in Drug Discovery and Development, M.Analoui and D.A.Dunn, eds. (International Society for Optical Engineering, 2005), p. 60090.
  17. M. Kobayashi, T. Mizumoto, Y. Shibuya, M. Enomoto, and M. Takeda, “Fluorescence tomography in turbid media based on acousto-optic modulation imaging,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 181101 (2006). [CrossRef]
  18. L. V. Wang, “Mechanisms of ultrasonic modulation of multiply scattered coherent light: an analytic model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 043903 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. A. Sassaroli and S. Fantini, “Comment on the modified Beer-Lambert law for scattering media,” Phys. Med. Biol. 49, N255-N257 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. R. Graaff, J. G. Aarnoudse, J. R. Zijp, P. M. A. Sloot, F. F. M. de Mul, J. Greve, and M. H. Koelink, “Reduced light-scattering properties for mixtures of spherical particles: a simple approximation derived from Mie calculations,” Appl. Opt. 31, 1370-1376 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light (Cambridge University, 1999). [PubMed]
  22. S. J. Norton and M. Linzer, “Correcting for ray refraction in velocity and attenuation tomography: a perturbation approach,” Ultrason. Imag. 4, 201-233 (1982). [CrossRef]
  23. L. Wang, S. L. Jacques, and L. Zheng, “MCML--Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in multi-layered tissues,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 47, 131-146 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Y. Gang and L. V. Wang, “Theoretical and experimental studies of ultrasound-modulated optical tomography in biological tissue,” Appl. Opt. 39, 659-664 (2000). [CrossRef]
  25. T. J. Farrell, M. S. Patterson, and B. Wilson, “A diffusion theory model of spatially resolved, steady-state diffuse reflectance for the noninvasive determination of tissue optical properties in vivo,” Med. Phys. 19, 879-888 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. T. Khan and J. Huabei, “A new diffusion approximation to the radiative transfer equation for scattering media with spatially varying refractive indices,” J. Opt. A 5, 137-141 (2003). [CrossRef]
  27. S. Norton, Q. Liu, and T. Vo-Dinh, “Ultrasonic modulation of diffuse incoherent light--a diffuse theory-based model,” in preparation (2008).
  28. W. Lihong and Z. Xuemei, “Ultrasound-modulated optical tomography of absorbing objects buried in dense tissue-simulating turbid media,” Appl. Opt. 36, 7277-7282 (1997). [CrossRef]
  29. E. W. Weisstein, “Rotation formula,” http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RotationFormula.html.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited