OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Editor: James C. Wyant
  • Vol. 47, Iss. 28 — Oct. 1, 2008
  • pp: F46–F60

Correction of systematic spatial noise in push-broom hyperspectral sensors: application to CHRIS/PROBA images

Luis Gómez-Chova, Luis Alonso, Luis Guanter, Gustavo Camps-Valls, Javier Calpe, and José Moreno  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 47, Issue 28, pp. F46-F60 (2008)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (14435 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Hyperspectral remote sensing images are affected by different types of noise. In addition to typical random noise, nonperiodic partially deterministic disturbance patterns generally appear in the data. These patterns, which are intrinsic to the image formation process, are characterized by a high degree of spatial and spectral coherence. We present a new technique that faces the problem of removing the spatially coherent noise known as vertical striping, usually found in images acquired by push-broom sensors. The developed methodology is tested on data acquired by the Compact High Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (CHRIS) onboard the Project for On-board Autonomy (PROBA) orbital platform, which is a typical example of a push-broom instrument exhibiting a relatively high noise component. The proposed correction method is based on the hypothesis that the vertical disturbance presents higher spatial frequencies than the surface radiance. A technique to exclude the contribution of the spatial high frequencies of the surface from the destriping process is introduced. First, the performance of the proposed algorithm is tested on a set of realistic synthetic images with added modeled noise in order to quantify the noise reduction and the noise estimation accuracy. Then, algorithm robustness is tested on more than 350 real CHRIS images from different sites, several acquisition modes (different spatial and spectral resolutions), and covering the full range of possible sensor temperatures. The proposed algorithm is benchmarked against the CHRIS reference algorithm. Results show excellent rejection of the noise pattern with respect to the original CHRIS images, especially improving the removal in those scenes with a natural high contrast. However, some low-frequency components still remain. In addition, the developed correction model captures and corrects the dependency of the noise patterns on sensor temperature, which confirms the robustness of the presented approach.

© 2008 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(030.1670) Coherence and statistical optics : Coherent optical effects
(030.4280) Coherence and statistical optics : Noise in imaging systems
(100.3020) Image processing : Image reconstruction-restoration
(110.4234) Imaging systems : Multispectral and hyperspectral imaging
(280.4788) Remote sensing and sensors : Optical sensing and sensors

ToC Category:
Hyperspectral Processing and Analysis

Original Manuscript: March 13, 2008
Revised Manuscript: June 12, 2008
Manuscript Accepted: June 12, 2008
Published: July 22, 2008

Luis Gómez-Chova, Luis Alonso, Luis Guanter, Gustavo Camps-Valls, Javier Calpe, and José Moreno, "Correction of systematic spatial noise in push-broom hyperspectral sensors: application to CHRIS/PROBA images," Appl. Opt. 47, F46-F60 (2008)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. B. Aiazzi, L. Alparone, A. Barducci, S. Baronti, and I. Pippi, “Estimating noise and information for multispectral imagery,” Opt. Eng. 41, 656-668 (2002). [CrossRef]
  2. M. Wettle, V. E. Brando, and A. G. Dekker, “A methodology for retrieval of environmental noise equivalent spectra applied to four Hyperion scenes of the same tropical coral reef,” Remote Sens. Environ. 93, 188-197 (2004). [CrossRef]
  3. A. Barducci and I. Pippi, “Analysis and rejection of systematic disturbances in hyperspectral remotely sensed images of the Earth,” Appl. Opt. 40, 1464-1477 (2001). [CrossRef]
  4. A. Barducci, D. Guzzi, P. Marcoionni, and I. Pippi, “CHRIS-PROBA performance evaluation: signal-to-noise ratio, instrument efficiency and data quality from acquisitions over San Rossore (Italy) test site,” in “Proceedings of Third CHRIS/Proba Workshop,,” ESA-SP-593 (European Space Agency, 2005), paper 09_bardu.pdf.
  5. P. Mouroulis, R. O. Green, and T. G. Chrien, “Design of pushbroom imaging spectrometers for optimum recovery of spectroscopic and spatial information,” Appl. Opt. 39, 2210-2220 (2000). [CrossRef]
  6. L. Guanter, R. Richter, and J. Moreno, “Spectral calibration of hyperspectral imagery using atmospheric absorption features,” Appl. Opt. 45, 2360-2370 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. M. Barnsley, J. Settle, M. Cutter, D. Lobb, and F. Teston, “The PROBA/CHRIS mission: a low-cost smallsat for hyperspectral, multi-angle, observations of the Earth surface and atmosphere,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 42, 1512-1520(2004). [CrossRef]
  8. D. Bernaerts, F. Teston, and J. Bermyn, “PROBA (Project for Onboard Autonomy),” presented at the 5th International Symposium on Systems and Services for Small Satellites (La Baule, France, 2000).
  9. M. Cutter and L. Johns, “CHRIS data products--latest issue,” in “Proceedings of Third CHRIS/Proba Workshop,,” ESA-SP-593 (European Space Agency, 2005), paper 05_cutter.pdf.
  10. L. Gómez-Chova, L. Alonso, L. Guanter, G. Camps-Valls, J. Calpe, and J. Moreno, “Modelling spatial and spectral systematic noise patterns on CHRIS/PROBA hyperspectral data,” Proc. SPIE 6365, 63650Z (2006). [CrossRef]
  11. A. Theuwissen, Solid-State Imaging with Charge-Coupled Devices (Kluwer Academic, 1995).
  12. M. Cutter, “Review of aspects associated with the CHRIS calibration,” in “Proceedings of the 2nd CHRIS/Proba Workshop,” ESA SP-578 (European Space Agency, 2004), paper 6_cutter.pdf.
  13. S. N. Torres, J. E. Pezoa, and M. M. Hayat, “Scene-based nonuniformity correction for focal plane arrays by the method of the inverse covariance form,” Appl. Opt. 42, 5872-5881(2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. J. E. Pezoa, M. M. Hayat, S. N. Torres, and M. S. Rahman, “Multimodel Kalman filtering for adaptive nonuniformity correction in infrared sensors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 1282-1291(2006). [CrossRef]
  15. F. Gadallah, F. Csillag, and E. Smith, “Destriping multisensor imagery with moment matching,” Int. J. Remote Sensing 21, 2505-2511 (2000). [CrossRef]
  16. J. Garcia and J. Moreno, “Removal of noises in CHRIS/Proba images: Application to the SPARC campaign data,” in “Proceedings of the 2nd CHRIS/Proba Workshop,” ESA SP-578 (European Space Agency, 2004), paper 9_GARCIA.pdf.
  17. J. Settle and M. Cutter, “HDFclean V2. A program for reprocessing images captured by the CHRIS hyper-spectral imager” (2005), http://earth.esa.int/proba/.
  18. P. Mlsna and T. Becker, “Striping artifact reduction in lunar orbiter mosaic images,” in 2006 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation (IEEE Computer Society, 2006), pp. 95-99. [CrossRef]
  19. R. Leathers, T. Downes, and R. Priest, “Scene-based nonuniformity corrections for optical and SWIR pushbroom sensors,” Opt. Express 13, 5136-5150 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. L. Gómez-Chova, J. Amorós, G. Camps-Valls, J. Martín, J. Calpe, L. Alonso, L. Guanter, J. Fortea, and J. Moreno, “Cloud detection for CHRIS/Proba hyperspectral images,” Proc. SPIE 5979, 59791Q (2005) [CrossRef]
  21. N. Fomferra and C. Brockmann, “BEAM--the ENVISAT MERIS and AATSR Toolbox,” in “ Proceedings of the MERIS (A) ATSR Workshop 2005,” ESA SP-597 (European Space Agency, 2005), paper paper_Fomferra.pdf.
  22. The BEAM Toolbox is a collection of open-source executable tools supported by ESA to facilitate the utilization, viewing, and processing of ESA Earth observation data. More information is available at http://envisat.esa.int/resources/softwaretools/ or http://www.brockmann-consult.de/beam/.
  23. CHRIS products are provided in top of the atmosphere radiance in a HDF v4 file format, which includes additional acquisition information (image date, azimuth and zenith view angles, etc.) contained in the metadata attributes of the CHRIS HDF file .
  24. L. Guanter, L. Alonso, and J. Moreno, “A method for the surface reflectance retrieval from PROBA/CHRIS data over land: application to ESA SPARC campaigns,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 43, 2908-2917 (2005). [CrossRef]
  25. M. Cutter and L. Johns, “CHRIS data format,” SIRA Tech. Rep. Issue 4.2 (European Space Agency, 2005), document 271.DO.13, http://earth.esa.int/proba/.
  26. R. Larsen, A. A. Nielsen, and K. Conradsen, “Restoration of hyperspectral push-broom scanner data,” in Proceedings of the 17th EARSeL Symposium on Future Trends in Remote Sensing,” P. Gudmandsen, ed. (A. A. Balkema, 1998), pp. 157-162.
  27. W. K. Pratt, Digital Image Processing: PIKS Inside, 3rd ed. (Wiley, 2001).
  28. N. Keshava, “Distance metrics and band selection in hyperspectral processing with applications to material identification and spectral libraries,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 42, 1552-1565 (2004). [CrossRef]
  29. H. Othman and S.-E. Qian, “Noise reduction of hyperspectral imagery using hybrid spatial-spectral derivative-domain wavelet shrinkage,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 44, 397-408 (2006). [CrossRef]
  30. L. L. Lapin, Probability and Statistics for Modern Engineering (Duxbury, PWS Publishers, 1983).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited