OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: James C. Wyant
  • Vol. 47, Iss. 36 — Dec. 20, 2008
  • pp: 6842–6851

Gaussian profile estimation in two dimensions

Nathan Hagen and Eustace L. Dereniak  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 47, Issue 36, pp. 6842-6851 (2008)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.47.006842


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (639 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We extend recent results for estimating the parameters of a one-dimensional Gaussian profile to two-dimensional profiles, deriving the exact covariance matrix of the estimated parameters. While the exact form is easy to compute, we provide a set of close approximations that allow the covariance to take on a simple analytic form. This not only provides new insight into the behavior of the estimation parameters, but also lays a foundation for clarifying previously published work. We also show how to calculate the parameter variances for the case of truncated sampling, where the profile lies near the edge of the array detector. Finally, we calculate expressions for the bias in the classical formulation of the problem and provide an approach for its removal. This allows us to show how the bias affects the problem of choosing an optimal pixel size for minimizing parameter variances.

© 2008 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(000.5490) General : Probability theory, stochastic processes, and statistics
(100.2960) Image processing : Image analysis
(300.3700) Spectroscopy : Linewidth

ToC Category:
Image Processing

History
Original Manuscript: January 31, 2008
Revised Manuscript: June 7, 2008
Manuscript Accepted: October 20, 2008
Published: December 15, 2008

Citation
Nathan Hagen and Eustace L. Dereniak, "Gaussian profile estimation in two dimensions," Appl. Opt. 47, 6842-6851 (2008)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-47-36-6842


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. N. Hagen, M. Kupinski, and E. L. Dereniak, “Gaussian profile estimation in one dimension,” Appl. Opt. 46, 5374-5383(2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. L. G. Kazovsky, “Beam position estimation by means of detector arrays,” Opt. Quantum Electron. 13, 201-208(1981). [CrossRef]
  3. L. H. Auer and W. F. van Altena, “Digital image centering II,” Astron. J. 83, 531-537 (1978). [CrossRef]
  4. R. Irwan and R. G. Lane, “Analysis of optimal centroid estimation applied to Shack-Hartmann sensing,” Appl. Opt. 38, 6737-6743 (1999). [CrossRef]
  5. M. K. Cheezum, W. F. Walker, and W. H. Guilford, “Quantitative comparison of algorithms for tracking single fluorescent particles,” Biophys. J. 81, 2378-2388 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. R. E. Thompson, D. R. Larson, and W. W. Webb, “Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes,” Biophys. J. 82, 2775-2783 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Y.-C. Chen, L. R. Furenlid, D. W. Wilson, and H. H. Barrett, “Calibration of scintillation cameras and pinhole SPECT imaging systems,” in Small-Animal SPECT Imaging, M. A. Kupinski and H. H. Barrett, eds. (Springer, 2005), Chap. 12, pp. 195-202. [CrossRef]
  8. S. V. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory (Prentice Hall, 1993), p. 34.
  9. What we call “flat noise” here was labeled “uniform noise” in . This has been changed in recognition that this can easily be mistaken as referring to noise obtained from the uniform probability distribution.
  10. It may seem that σ2mgm/Qm is the appropriate substitution here, but since the raw measurements gm are scaled versions of the Poisson-distributed photoelectrons, the variance increases as the square of the scale parameter, Qm.
  11. S. Brandt, Data Analysis, 3rd ed., (Springer1999), p. 113-114.
  12. K. A. Winick, “Cramér-Rao lower bounds on the performance of charge-coupled-device optical position estimators,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 1809-1815 (1986). [CrossRef]
  13. H. H. Barrett, C. Dainty, and D. Lara, “Maximum-likelihood methods in wavefront sensing: stochastic models and likelihood functions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 391-414 (2007). [CrossRef]
  14. The Interactive Data Language software is developed by ITT Visual Information Systems, http://www.ittvis.com/index.asp.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited