OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 48, Iss. 13 — May. 1, 2009
  • pp: 2522–2535

Possibility of corrector plate tuning of x-ray focusing

Richard Talman  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 48, Issue 13, pp. 2522-2535 (2009)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (957 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Schemes for focusing a hard x-ray beam to a small spot are described. The theoretical minimum spot size, assuming perfect mirror shape, is shown to be 4 nm FWHM, independent of x-ray wavelength. This is less than the 10 nm previously said to be the minimum achievable diffraction-limited x-ray spot size. While providing the penetrating power only possible with x rays, this approaches the resolution needed to image individual atoms or atomic layers. However, the perfect mirror assumption is physically unrealistic. This paper discusses the compensation of mirror shape errors by a corrector plate and shows that the tolerances for corrector plate shape are far looser than are tolerances for mirror shape. The full eventual success of achieving theoretical minimum resolution will require mirror shape precision considerably better than has been achieved at this time, though far looser than would be required for simpleminded paraboloidal focusing. Two variants of the scheme, subject to the same mathematical treatment, are described. (i) The “corrector plate” name is copied from the similarly functioning element of the same name in a Schmidt camera. The focusing is achieved using glancing, yet coherent, reflection from a high-Z paraboloidal mirror. The strategy is to obtain dominant focusing from reflection and to compensate with weak refractive focusing. The reflective focusing is strong and achromatic but insufficiently accurate. The refractive focusing is weak and chromatic but highly accurate. The corrector plate improves resolution the way eyeglasses help a person to see. It can, for example, be “fitted” the same trial-and-error way an optometrist establishes a prescription for glasses. Dimensional tolerances for the compensator are far looser than would be needed for a mirror to achieve the same resolution. Unlike compound refractive lenses, attenuation will be small, at least for wavelengths longer than 1 Å , because the compensation layer is thin. (ii) For this variant, the corrector plate is a washer-shaped refractive or Fresnel lens, and the mirror is (theoretically) a perfect cone. All focusing is provided by the lens. Even though the cone provides no focusing, it improves the resolution by increasing the numerical aperture of the device. Compared to a paraboloidal shape, it is assumed that the conical shape can be more accurately fabricated. Of the two variants, only the first variant is, in principle, capable of achieving the theoretical minimum resolution. Configurations are suggested, in both case (i) and case (ii), that use currently possible construction precisions to produce resolutions better than have been achieved to date. However, both results will remain well above the theoretical minimum until fabrication techniques have been developed that provide greater precision than is possible at this time.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(110.7440) Imaging systems : X-ray imaging
(340.7470) X-ray optics : X-ray mirrors
(050.1965) Diffraction and gratings : Diffractive lenses

ToC Category:
X-ray Optics

Original Manuscript: December 19, 2008
Revised Manuscript: March 19, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: March 23, 2009
Published: April 27, 2009

Virtual Issues
Vol. 4, Iss. 7 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Richard Talman, "Possibility of corrector plate tuning of x-ray focusing," Appl. Opt. 48, 2522-2535 (2009)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. B. Huang, W. Wang, M. Bates, and X. Zhuang, “Three-dimensional super-resolution imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy,” Science 319, 810-813 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. R. Medenwaldt and E. Uggerhøj, “Description of an x-ray microscope with 30 nm resolution,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69, 2974-2977 (1998). [CrossRef]
  3. V. V. Aristov, Yu A. Basov, S. V. Redkin, A. A. Snigirev, and V. A. Yunkin, “Bragg zone plates for hard x-ray focusing,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 261, 72-74 (1987). [CrossRef]
  4. C. Bergemann, H. Keymeulen, and J. Vander Veen, “Focusing x-ray beams to nanometer dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 204801 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. D.Mills, ed., Third Generation Hard X-Ray Synchrotron Radiation Sources (Wiley-Interscience, 2002).
  6. S. Tamura, M. Yasumoto, N. Kamijo, Y. Suzuki, M. Awaji, A. Takeuchi, H. Takano, and K. Handa, “Development of a multilayer Fresnel zone plate for high-energy synchrotron radiation x-rays by DC sputtering deposition,” J. Synchrotron Radiat. 9, 154-159 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. K. Evans-Lutterodt, A. Stein, J. Ablett, N. Bozovic, A. Taylor, and D. Tennant, “Using compound kinoform hard-x-ray lenses to exceed the critical angle limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 134801 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. D. Bilderback and S. Hubbard, “X-ray mirror reflectivities from 3.8 to 50 keV (3.3 to 0.25 Å Part II: Pt, Si, and other materials,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 195, 91-95(1982). [CrossRef]
  9. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 7th ed. (Cambridge U. Press, 1999).
  10. D. Jackson, Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, 1998), p. 490.
  11. D. Korsch, Reflective Optics (Academic, 1991).
  12. T. Kawai, K. Sawada, and Y. Takeuchi, “Ultra-precision micro structuring by means of mechanical machining” (IEEE, 2001), paper 0-7803-5998-4/01.
  13. J. Hubbell and S. Seltzer, X-Ray Attenuation Coefficients (NIST, 1996).
  14. B. X. Yang, “Fresnel and refractive lenses for x-rays,”Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 328, 578-587(1993). [CrossRef]
  15. J. Yang, J. Deng, N. Chandrasekhar, and C. Joachim, “UHV-STM manipulation of single flat gold nano-islands for constructing interconnection nanopads on MoS2,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 61, 1288-1293 (2007). [CrossRef]
  16. X. Zeng, F. Duewer, M. Feser, C. Huang, A. Lyon, A. Tkachuk, and W. Yun, “Ellipsoidal and parabolic glass capillaries as condensers for x-ray microscopes,” Appl. Opt. 47, 2376-2381 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. A. Snigirev, A. Bjeoumikhov, A. Erko, I. Snigireva, M. Grigoriev, V. Yunkin, M. Erko, and S. Bjeoumikhova, “Submicrometer hard x-ray focusing using a single-bounce ellipsoidal capillary combined with a Fresnel zone plate,” J. Synchrotron Radiat. 14, 227-228 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited