OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 48, Iss. 13 — May. 1, 2009
  • pp: 2559–2565

Alternative method for determining the constant offset in lidar signal

Vladimir A. Kovalev, Cyle Wold, Alexander Petkov, and Wei Min Hao  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 48, Issue 13, pp. 2559-2565 (2009)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.002559


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (551 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We present an alternative method for determining the total offset in lidar signal created by a daytime background-illumination component and electrical or digital offset. Unlike existing techniques, here the signal square-range-correction procedure is initially performed using the total signal recorded by lidar, without subtraction of the offset component. While performing the square-range correction, the lidar-signal monotonic change due to the molecular component of the atmosphere is simultaneously compensated. After these corrections, the total offset is found by determining the slope of the above transformed signal versus a function that is defined as a ratio of the squared range and two molecular scattering components, the backscatter and transmittance. The slope is determined over a far end of the measurement range where aerosol loading is zero or, at least, minimum. An important aspect of this method is that the presence of a moderate aerosol loading over the far end does not increase dramatically the error in determining the lidar-signal offset. The comparison of the new technique with a conventional technique of the total-offset estimation is made using simulated and experimental data. The one-directional and multiangle measurements are analyzed and specifics in the estimate of the uncertainty limits due to remaining shifts in the inverted lidar signals are discussed. The use of the new technique allows a more accurate estimate of the signal constant offset, and accordingly, yields more accurate lidar-signal inversion results.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(280.3640) Remote sensing and sensors : Lidar
(290.1350) Scattering : Backscattering
(290.2200) Scattering : Extinction

ToC Category:
Remote Sensing and Sensors

History
Original Manuscript: January 2, 2009
Revised Manuscript: March 31, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: April 14, 2009
Published: April 28, 2009

Citation
Vladimir A. Kovalev, Cyle Wold, Alexander Petkov, and Wei Min Hao, "Alternative method for determining the constant offset in lidar signal," Appl. Opt. 48, 2559-2565 (2009)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-48-13-2559


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. V. A. Kovalev, “Distortion of the extinction coefficient profile caused by systematic errors in lidar data,” Appl. Opt. 43, 3191-3198 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. S. R. Ahmad and E. M. Bulliet, “Performance evaluation of a laboratory-based Raman lidar in atmospheric pollution measurement,” Opt. Laser Technol. 26, 323-331 (1994). [CrossRef]
  3. H. Shimizu, Y. Sasano, H. Nakane, N. Sugimoto, I. Matsui, and N. Takeuchi, “Large-scale laser radar for measuring aerosol distribution over a wide area,” Appl. Opt. 24, 617-626(1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Y. Zhao, “Signal-induced fluorescence in photomultipliers in differential absorption lidar systems,” Appl. Opt. 38, 4639-4648 (1999). [CrossRef]
  5. J. A. Sunesson, A. Apituley, and D. P. J. Swart, “Differential absorption lidar system for routine monitoring of tropospheric ozone,” Appl. Opt. 33, 7045-7058 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. H. S. Lee, G. K. Schwemmer, C. L. Korb, M. Dombrowski, and C. Prasad, “Gated photomultiplier response characterization for DIAL measurements,” Appl. Opt. 29, 3303-3315 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. M. Bristow, “Suppression of afterpulsing in photomultipliers by gating the photocathode,” Appl. Opt. 41, 4975-4987 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. V. A. Kovalev, W. M. Hao, C. Wold, and M. Adam, “Experimental method for the examination of systematic distortions in lidar data,” Appl. Opt. 46, 6710-6718 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. M. Adam, V. A. Kovalev, C. Wold, J. Newton, M. Pahlow, Wei M. Hao, and M. B. Parlange, “Application of the Kano-Hamilton multiangle inversion method in clear atmospheres,” J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 24, 2014-2028 (2007). [CrossRef]
  10. O. Uchino and I. Tabata, “Mobile lidar for simultaneous measurements of ozone, aerosols, and temperature in the stratosphere,” Appl. Opt. 30, 2005-2012 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. J. R. Taylor, An Introduction to Error Analysis. the Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements (University Science Books, 1997).
  12. A. Comeron, F. Rocadenbosch, M. A. Lopez, A. Rodriguez, C. Munoz, D. Garcia-Vizcaino, and M. Sicard, “Effects of noise on lidar data inversion with the backward algorithm,” Appl. Opt. 43, 2572-2577 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. V. A. Kovalev, W. M. Hao, and C. Wold, “Determination of the particulate extinction-coefficient profile and the column-integrated lidar ratios using the backscatter-coefficient and optical-depth profiles,” Appl. Opt. 46, 8627-8634 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited