OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 49, Iss. 16 — Jun. 1, 2010
  • pp: 3127–3139

Projection quality improvement with embedded illumination modulator in projector system

Chu-Ming Cheng and Jyh-Long Chern  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 49, Issue 16, pp. 3127-3139 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.003127


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1451 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We demonstrate an approach for improving the image quality for a projector system with a shape- programmable pupil, which could be generated by an illumination modular in which a digital micromirror device is embedded. Essentially, the shaped pupil from the illumination modulator is developed with a dynamically programmable approach to provide aberration compensation for the projection system. By analyzing the optical transfer function, the resolution limit of an imaging system with specific defocus, spherical aberration and coma are shown to be improved significantly with a binary-shaped pupil. It is found that the improvement of the projection quality could be characterized by the scale ratio of K = c / D , defined as the ratio between the resolution scale of structured light, c, and the size scale of the aperture stop, D. When K is equal to 0.05, the low-frequency components of the image could be improved, while if K is equal to 0.3, the imaging quality of the image at high-frequency components can be enhanced in a defocused system. Furthermore, as K ranges from 0.05 to 0.3, the imaging performance of the optical contrast could be enhanced in a projector system with large coefficients of defocused, spherical aberration and coma.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(110.2960) Imaging systems : Image analysis
(110.4850) Imaging systems : Optical transfer functions
(220.1000) Optical design and fabrication : Aberration compensation
(110.2945) Imaging systems : Illumination design
(230.4685) Optical devices : Optical microelectromechanical devices

ToC Category:
Integrated Optics

History
Original Manuscript: February 10, 2010
Revised Manuscript: April 18, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: April 20, 2010
Published: May 31, 2010

Citation
Chu-Ming Cheng and Jyh-Long Chern, "Projection quality improvement with embedded illumination modulator in projector system," Appl. Opt. 49, 3127-3139 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-49-16-3127


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. E. H. Stupp and M. S. Brennesholtz, Projection Display(Wiley, 1999).
  2. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, 3rd ed.(Roberts, 2005).
  3. M. Mino and Y. Okano, “Improvement in the OTF of a defocused optical system through the use of shaded apertures,” Appl. Opt. 10, 2219–2225 (1971). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. J. Ojeda-Castaneda, P. Andrea, and A. Diaz, “Annular apodizers for low sensitivity to defocus and to spherical aberration,” Opt. Lett. 11, 487–489 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. C. S. Chung and H. H. Hopkins, “Influence of nonuniform amplitude on the optical transfer function,” Appl. Opt. 28, 1244–1250 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. J. A. Davis, J. C. Escalera, J. Campos, A. Marquez, and M. J. Yzuel, “Programmable axial apodizing and hyperresolving amplitude filters with a liquid-crystal spatial light modulator,” Opt. Lett. 24, 628–630 (1999). [CrossRef]
  7. A. Marquez, C. Iemmi, J. Campos, J. C. Escalera, and M. J. Yzuel, “Programmable apodizer to compensate chromatic aberration effects using a liquid-crystal spatial light modulator,” Opt. Express 13, 716–730 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. J. van der Gracht and W. T. Rhodes, “Source sampling for incoherent imaging and spatial filtering,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 1165–1167 (1989). [CrossRef]
  9. C. M. Cheng and J. L. Chern, “Programmable apodizer in incoherent imaging systems using a digital micromirror device,” Opt. Eng. 49, 023201 (2010). [CrossRef]
  10. D. Dudley, W. Duncan, and J. Slaughter, “Emerging digital micromirror device (DMD) application,” Proc. SPIE 4985, 14–15(2003). [CrossRef]
  11. H. H. Hopkins, “The frequency response of a defocused optical system,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 231, 91–103(1955). [CrossRef]
  12. C. M. Cheng and J.-L. Chern, “Design of a dual-F-number illumination system and its application to projection display with DMD™,” J. Soc. Inf. Display 14, 819–827 (2006). [CrossRef]
  13. Y. Kwak and L. MacDonald, “Characterisation of a desktop LCD projector,” Displays 21, 179–194 (2000). [CrossRef]
  14. Mathematica version 4, Wolfram Research, Incorporated, 100 Trade Center Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820-7237, USA.
  15. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1951_USAF_resolution_test_chart.
  16. See http://www.eronn.net/camera/test-chart.
  17. V. N. Mahajan, Optical Imaging and Aberrations: Part II. Wave Diffraction Optics (SPIE, 2001).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited