OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 49, Iss. 29 — Oct. 10, 2010
  • pp: 5545–5560

New aerosol models for the retrieval of aerosol optical thickness and normalized water-leaving radiances from the SeaWiFS and MODIS sensors over coastal regions and open oceans

Ziauddin Ahmad, Bryan A. Franz, Charles R. McClain, Ewa J. Kwiatkowska, Jeremy Werdell, Eric P. Shettle, and Brent N. Holben  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 49, Issue 29, pp. 5545-5560 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.005545


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1124 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We describe the development of a new suite of aerosol models for the retrieval of atmospheric and oceanic optical properties from the SeaWiFS and MODIS sensors, including aerosol optical thickness (τ), angstrom coefficient (α), and water-leaving radiance ( L w ). The new aerosol models are derived from Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) observations and have bimodal lognormal distributions that are narrower than previous models used by the Ocean Biology Processing Group. We analyzed AERONET data over open ocean and coastal regions and found that the seasonal variability in the modal radii, particularly in the coastal region, was related to the relative humidity. These findings were incorporated into the models by making the modal radii, as well as the refractive indices, explicitly dependent on relative humidity. From these findings, we constructed a new suite of aerosol models. We considered eight relative humidity values (30%, 50%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, and 95%) and, for each relative humidity value, we constructed ten distributions by varying the fine-mode fraction from zero to 1. In all, 80 distributions ( 8 R h × 10 fine-mode fractions) were created to process the satellite data. We also assumed that the coarse-mode particles were nonabsorbing (sea salt) and that all observed absorptions were entirely due to fine-mode particles. The composition of the fine mode was varied to ensure that the new models exhibited the same spectral dependence of single scattering albedo as observed in the AERONET data. The reprocessing of the SeaWiFS data show that, over deep ocean, the average τ 865 values retrieved from the new aerosol models was 0.100 ± 0.004 , which was closer to the average AERONET value of 0.086 ± 0.066 for τ 870 for the eight open-ocean sites used in this study. The average τ 865 value from the old models was 0.131 ± 0.005 . The comparison of monthly mean aerosol optical thickness retrieved from the SeaWiFS sensor with AERONET data over Bermuda and Wallops Island show very good agreement with one another. In fact, 81% of the data points over Bermuda and 78% of the data points over Wallops Island fall within an uncertainty of ± 0.02 in optical thickness. As a part of the reprocessing effort of the SeaWiFS data, we also revised the vicarious calibration gain factors, which resulted in significant improvement in angstrom coefficient (α) retrievals. The average value of α from the new models over Bermuda is 0.841 ± 0.171 , which is in good agreement with the AERONET value of 0.891 ± 0.211 . The average value of α retrieved using old models is 0.394 ± 0.087 , which is significantly lower than the AERONET value.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(070.4550) Fourier optics and signal processing : Correlators
(070.6110) Fourier optics and signal processing : Spatial filtering
(120.5050) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Phase measurement
(120.6650) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Surface measurements, figure

ToC Category:
Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics

History
Original Manuscript: February 18, 2010
Revised Manuscript: July 20, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: August 26, 2010
Published: October 5, 2010

Virtual Issues
Vol. 5, Iss. 14 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Ziauddin Ahmad, Bryan A. Franz, Charles R. McClain, Ewa J. Kwiatkowska, Jeremy Werdell, Eric P. Shettle, and Brent N. Holben, "New aerosol models for the retrieval of aerosol optical thickness and normalized water-leaving radiances from the SeaWiFS and MODIS sensors over coastal regions and open oceans," Appl. Opt. 49, 5545-5560 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-49-29-5545


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. B. Husar, J. M. Prospero, and L. L. Stowe, “Characterization of tropospheric aerosols over the oceans with the NOAA advanced very high resolution radiometer optical thickness operational product,” J. Geophys. Res. 102, 16889–16909(1997). [CrossRef]
  2. E. P. Shettle and R. W. Fenn, “Models for the aerosols of the lower atmosphere and the effects of humidity variations on their optical properties,” AFGL-TR 790214, U. S. Air Force Laboratory, Hanscom Air Force Base, Mass. (1979).
  3. G. A. d’Almeida, P. Koepke, and E. P. Shettle, Atmospheric Aerosols Global Climatology and Radiative Characteristics (A. Deepak, 1991).
  4. C. E. Junge, “Our knowledge on the physico-chemistry of aerosols in the undisturbed marine environment,” J. Geophys. Res. 77, 5183–5200 (1972). [CrossRef]
  5. D. Deirmendjian, “Scattering and polarization properties of water clouds and hazes in the visible and infrared,” Appl. Opt. 3, 187–196 (1964). [CrossRef]
  6. D. Deirmendjian, Electromagnetic Scattering on Spherical Polydispersions (Elsevier, 1969).
  7. C. N. Davies, “Size distribution of atmospheric particles,” J. Aerosol Sci. 5, 293–300 (1974). [CrossRef]
  8. H. R. Gordon and M. Wang, “Retrieval of water leaving radiance and aerosol optical thickness over the oceans with SeaWiFS: a preliminary algorithm,” Appl. Opt. 33, 443–452(1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. H. R. Gordon, “Atmospheric correction of ocean color imagery in the Earth Observing system era,” J. Geophys. Res. 102, 17081–17106 (1997). [CrossRef]
  10. D. Antoine and A. Morel, “A multiple scattering algorithm for atmospheric correction of remotely sensed ocean color (MERIS instrument): principle and implementation for atmospheres carrying various aerosols including absorbing ones,” Int. J. Remote Sens. 20, 1875–1916 (1999). [CrossRef]
  11. World Climate Program, WCP-112, “A preliminary cloudless standard atmosphere for radiation computation,” WMO/TD No. 24, World Meteorological Organization (1986).
  12. L. Schutz, “Long-range transport of desert dust with special emphasis on the Sahara,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 338, 515–532(1980). [CrossRef]
  13. G. Hänel, “The properties of atmospheric aerosol particles as functions of the relative humidity at thermodynamic equilibrium with the surrounding moist air,” in Advances in Geophysics, H.E.Landsberg and J.V.Miehem, eds. (Academic, 1976), Vol.  19. [CrossRef]
  14. A. Smirnov, B. Holben, Y. J. Kaufman, O. Dubovik, T. F. Eck, I. Slutsker, C. Pietras, and R. N. Halthore, “Optical properties of atmospheric aerosol in marine environments,” J. Atmos. Sci. 59, 501–523 (2002). [CrossRef]
  15. M. Wang, K. D. Knobelspiesse, and C. R. McCain, “Study of the Sea-Viewing Wide Field-of-View Sensor (SeaWiFS) aerosol optical property data over ocean in combination with ocean color products,” J. Geophys. Res. 110, doi:10.1029/2004JD004950 (2005). [CrossRef]
  16. B. N. Holben, T. F. Eck, I. Slutsker, D. Tanre, J. P. Buis, A. Setzer, E. Vermote, J. A. Reagan, Y. Kaufman, T. Nakajima, F. Lavenu, I. Jankowiak, and A. Smirnov, “AERONET—A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization,” Remote Sens. Environ. 66, 1–16 (1998). [CrossRef]
  17. B. N. Holben, D. Tanre, A. Smirnov, T. F. Eck, I. Slutsker, N. Abuhassan, W. W. Newcomb, J. Schafer, B. Chatenet, F. Lavenue, Y. J. Kaufman, J. Vande Castle, A. Setzer, B. Markham, D. Clark, R. Frouin, R. Halthore, A. Karnieli, N. T. O’Neill, C. Pietras, R. T. Pinker, K. Voss, and G. Zibordi, “An emerging ground-based aerosol climatology: aerosol optical depth from AERONET,” J. Geophys. Res. 106, 12067–12097 (2001). [CrossRef]
  18. O. Dubovik and M. D. King, “A flexible inversion algorithm for retrieval of aerosol optical properties from Sun and sky radiance measurements,” J. Geophys. Res. 105, 20673–20696(2000). [CrossRef]
  19. O. Dubovik, A. Smirnov, B. Holben, M. D. King, Y. J. Kaufman, T. F. Eck, and I. Slutsker, “Accuracy assessments of aerosol optical properties retrieved from AERONET Sun and sky radiance measurements,” J. Geophys. Res. 105, 9791–9806(2000). [CrossRef]
  20. O. Dubovik, B. Holben, T. F. Eck, A. Smirnov, Y. J. Kaufman, M. D. King, D. Tanre, and I. Slutsker, “Variability of absorption and optical properties of key aerosol types observed in worldwide locations,” J. Atmos. Sci. 59, 590–608 (2002). [CrossRef]
  21. O. Dubovik, “Optimization of numerical inversion in photopolarimetric remote sensing,” in Photopolarimetry in Remote Sensing, G.Videen, Y.Yatskiv, and M.Mishchenko, eds. (Kluwer Academic, 2004), pp. 65–106.
  22. O. Dubovik, A. Sinyuk, T. Lapyonok, B. N. Holben, M. Mishchenko, P. Yang, T. F. Eck, H. Volten, O. Munoz, B. Veihelmann, W. J. vander Zande, J-F. Leon, M. Sorokin, and I. Slutsker, “Application of spheroid models to account for aerosol particle nonsphericity in remote sensing of desert dust,” J. Geophys. Res. 111, D11208, doi:10.1029/2005JD006619 (2006). [CrossRef]
  23. A. Sinyuk, O. Dubovik, B. Holben, T. F. Eck, F-M. Breon, J. Martonchik, R. Kahn, D. J. Diner, E. F. Vermote, J-C. Roger, T. Lapyonok, and I. Slutsker, “Simultaneous retrieval of aerosol and surface properties from a combination of AERONET and satellite,” Remote Sens. Environ. 107, 90–108, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.022 (2007). [CrossRef]
  24. J. E. Hansen and L. D. Travis, “Light scattering in planetary atmospheres,” Space Sci. Rev. 16, 527–610 (1974). [CrossRef]
  25. D. Tanre, Y. J. Kaufman, and S. Mattoo, “Remote sensing of aerosol properties over oceans using MODIS/EOS spectral radiances,” J. Geophys. Res. 102, 16971–16988 (1997). [CrossRef]
  26. A. H. Omar, J. Won, D. M. Winker, S. Yoon, O. Dubovik, and M. P. McCormick, “Development of global aerosol models using cluster analysis of AERONET measurements,” J. Geophys. Res. 110, D10S14, doi:10.1029/2004JD004874 (2005). [CrossRef]
  27. L. Gross, R. Frouin, C. Pietras, and G. Fargion, “Non-supervised classification of aerosol mixtures for ocean color remote sensing,” Proc. SPIE 4892, 95–104 (2003). [CrossRef]
  28. F. Zagolski, R. Santer, and Q. Aznay, “A new climatology for atmospheric correction based on aerosol inherent optical properties,” J. Geophys. Res. 112, D14208, doi:10.1029/2006JD007496 (2007). [CrossRef]
  29. J. Wang and S. T. Martin, “Satellite characterization of urban aerosols: importance of including hygroscopicity and mixing state in the retrieval algorithms,” J. Geophys. Res. 112, D17203, doi:10.1029/2006JD008078 (2007). [CrossRef]
  30. S. W. Bailey, B. A. Franz, and P. J. Werdell, “Estimation of near-infrared water-leaving reflectance for satellite ocean color data processing,” Opt. Express 18, 7521–7527 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Z. Ahmad and R. S. Fraser, “An iterative radiative transfer code for ocean-atmosphere system,” J. Atmos. Sci. 39, 656–665(1982). [CrossRef]
  32. B. A. Franz, S. W. Bailey, P. J. Werdell, and C. R. McClain, “Sensor-independent approach to vicarious calibration of satellite ocean color radiometry,” Appl. Opt. 465068–5082 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. S. W. Bailey and P. J. Werdell, “A multi-sensor approach for the on-orbit validation of ocean color satellite data products,” Remote Sens. Environ. 102, 12–23 (2006). [CrossRef]
  34. M. I. Mishchenko, B. Cairns, J. E. Hansen, L. D. Travis, R. Burg, Y. J. Kaufman, J. V. Martin, and E. P. Shettle, “Monitoring of aerosol forcing of climate from space: analysis of measurements requirement,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 88, 149–161 (2004). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited