OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 49, Iss. 31 — Nov. 1, 2010
  • pp: 6179–6188

Worst-case-based methodology for tolerance analysis and tolerance allocation of optical systems

Chun-Che Hsueh, Psang Dain Lin, and Jose Sasian  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 49, Issue 31, pp. 6179-6188 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.006179


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (337 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A methodology based on the worst-case approach is proposed for solving the tolerance analysis and tolerance allocation problems for optical systems. Compared with existing methods, the proposed tolerance allocation method has two principal advantages, namely, (1) it is based on an optical geometry gradient matrix and therefore provides means of obtaining the allowable tolerance limits, and (2) it yields the allowable tolerance limits of all the independent variables in the optical system simultaneously. The validity of the proposed methodology is demonstrated using a Dove prism for illustration purposes.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(080.2720) Geometric optics : Mathematical methods (general)
(080.2740) Geometric optics : Geometric optical design
(080.1753) Geometric optics : Computation methods

History
Original Manuscript: June 29, 2010
Revised Manuscript: August 30, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: September 3, 2010
Published: October 29, 2010

Citation
Chun-Che Hsueh, Psang Dain Lin, and Jose Sasian, "Worst-case-based methodology for tolerance analysis and tolerance allocation of optical systems," Appl. Opt. 49, 6179-6188 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-49-31-6179


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. N. S. F. Ozkan, W. L. Hendrick, P. J. Marchand, and S. C. Esener, “Misalignment tolerance analysis of free-space optical interconnects via statistical methods,” Appl. Opt. 41, 2686–2694 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. M. Rimmer, “Analysis of perturbed lens systems,” Appl. Opt. 9, 533–537 (1970). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. A. M. Ghodgaonkar and R. D. Tewari, “Measurement of apex angle of the prism using total internal reflection,” Opt. Laser Technol. 36, 617–624 (2004). [CrossRef]
  4. J. F. Lee and C. Y. Leung, “Method of calculating the alignment tolerance of a Porro prism resonator,” Appl. Opt. 28, 3691–3697 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. S. K. Gupta and R. Hradaynath, “Angular tolerance on Dove prisms,” Appl. Opt. 22, 3146–3147 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. E. G. Herrera and M. Strojnik, “Interferometric tolerance determination for a Dove prism using exact ray trace,” Opt. Commun. 281, 897–905 (2008). [CrossRef]
  7. E. Gutierrez, M. Strojnik, and G. Paez, “Tolerance determination for a Dove prism using exact ray trace,” Proc. SPIE 6307, 63070K (2006). [CrossRef]
  8. B. D. Stone and G. W. Forbes, “Differential ray tracing in inhomogeneous media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2824–2836 (1997). [CrossRef]
  9. S. Purnet, B. Journet, and G. Fortunato, “Exact calculation of the optical path difference and description of a new birefringent interferometer,” Opt. Eng. 38, 983–990 (1999). [CrossRef]
  10. A. Saltelli, K. Chan, and E. M. Scott, Sensitivity Analysis(Wiley, 2000).
  11. P. D. Lin and C. Y. Tsai, “First order gradients of skew rays of axis-symmetrical optical systems,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 776–784 (2007). [CrossRef]
  12. P. D. Lin and C. Y. Tsai, “General method for determining the first order gradients of skew rays of optical systems with non-coplanar optical axes,” Appl. Phys. B 91, 621–628(2008). [CrossRef]
  13. C. C. Hsueh and P. D. Lin, “Computationally-efficient gradient matrix of optical path length in axisymmetric optical systems,” Appl. Opt. 48, 893–902 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. C. C. Hsueh and P. D. Lin, “Gradient matrix of optical path length for evaluating the effects of variable changes in a prism,” Appl. Phys. B 98, 471–479 (2010). [CrossRef]
  15. R. P. Paul, Robot Manipulators-Mathematics, Programming and Control (MIT Press, 1982).
  16. E. T. Fortini, Dimensioning for Interchangeable Manufacturing (Industrial Press, 1967), p. 48.
  17. M. F. Spotts, “Dimensioning stacked assemblies,” Machine Design , 50, 60–63 (1978).
  18. P. D. Lin and K. F. Ehmann, “Inverse error analysis for multi-axis machines,” ASME J. Eng. Ind. Trans. ASME 118, 88–94 (1996). [CrossRef]
  19. I. Moreno, G. Paez, and M. Strojnik, “Dove prism with increased throughput for implementation in a rotational-shearing interferometer,” Appl. Opt. 42, 4514–4520 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. B. Benhabib, R. G. Fenton, and A. A. Goldenberg, “Computer-aided joint error analysis of robots,” IEEE J. Robot. Automat. 3, 317–322 (1987). [CrossRef]
  21. M. F. Spotts, “Allocation of tolerances to minimize cost of assembly,” J. Eng. Ind. Trans. ASME 95, 762–764 (1973). [CrossRef]
  22. F. H. Speckhart, “Calculation of tolerance based on a minimum cost approach,” J. Eng. Ind. Trans. ASME 94, 447–453 (1972). [CrossRef]
  23. R. N. Youngworth and B. D. Stone, “Cost-based tolerancing of optical systems,” Appl. Opt. 39, 4501–4512 (2000). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited