OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 50, Iss. 1 — Jan. 1, 2011
  • pp: 17–21

Reduced Fresnel losses in chalcogenide fibers obtained through fiber-end microstructuring

Catalin Florea, Jasbinder Sanghera, Lynda Busse, Brandon Shaw, Fritz Miklos, and Ishwar Aggarwal  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 50, Issue 1, pp. 17-21 (2011)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (614 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



We demonstrate microstructuring of chalcogenide fiber facets in order to obtain enhanced transmission due to the antireflective properties of the microstructured surfaces. A variety of molding approaches have been investigated for As 2 S 3 and As 3 Se 3 fibers. Transmission as high as 97% per facet was obtained in the case of As 2 S 3 fiber, compared to the native, Fresnel-loss limited, transmission of 83%.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(060.2390) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics, infrared
(120.4610) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Optical fabrication
(050.2065) Diffraction and gratings : Effective medium theory

ToC Category:
Fiber Optics and Optical Communications

Original Manuscript: July 19, 2010
Revised Manuscript: October 18, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: October 22, 2010
Published: December 22, 2010

Catalin Florea, Jasbinder Sanghera, Lynda Busse, Brandon Shaw, Fritz Miklos, and Ishwar Aggarwal, "Reduced Fresnel losses in chalcogenide fibers obtained through fiber-end microstructuring," Appl. Opt. 50, 17-21 (2011)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Cambridge University, 1999), Chap. 1, pp. 54–74.
  2. P. van de Werf and J. Haisma, “Broadband antireflective coatings for fiber-communication optics,” Appl. Opt. 23, 499–503 (1984). [CrossRef]
  3. W. H. Southwell, “Pyramid-array surface-relief structures producing antireflection index matching on optical surfaces,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 549–553 (1991). [CrossRef]
  4. A. B. Harker and J. F. DeNatale, “Diamond gradient index “moth-eye” antireflection surfaces for LWIR windows,” Proc. SPIE 1760, 261–267 (1992). [CrossRef]
  5. M. E. Motamedi, W. H. Southwell, and W. J. Gunning, “Antireflection surfaces in silicon using binary optics technology,” Appl. Opt. 31, 4371–4376 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. C. G. Bernhard and W. H. Miller, “A corneal nipple pattern in insect compound eyes,” Acta Physiol. Scand. 56, 385–386(1962). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. D. Hobbs and B. D. MacLeod, “Design, fabrication, and measured performance of anti-reflecting surface textures in infrared transmitting materials,” Proc. SPIE 5786, 349–364(2005). [CrossRef]
  8. P. Lalanne and G. M. Morris, “Antireflection behavior of silicon subwavelength periodic structures for visible light,” Nanotechnology 8, 53–56 (1997). [CrossRef]
  9. M. Bitzer, J. Zosel, and M. Gebhardt, “Replication and surface enhancement of microstructured optical components,” Proc. SPIE 5965, 596502 (2005). [CrossRef]
  10. Y. M. Song, S. Y. Bae, J. S. Yu, and Y. T. Lee, “Closely packed and aspect-ratio-controlled antireflection subwavelength gratings on GaAs using a lenslike shape transfer,” Opt. Lett. 34, 1702–1704 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. “Damage threshold at 10.6μm in AMTIR2 glass for example was almost two times larger when patterned with motheye structure compared to when the substrate is left bare,” TelAztec (personal communication, 2010).
  12. C. Viets and W. Hill, “Comparison of fibre-optic SERS sensors with differently prepared tips,” Sens. Actuators B 51, 92–99(1998). [CrossRef]
  13. G. Kostovski, D. J. White, A. Mitchell, M. W. Austin, and P. R. Stoddart, “Nanoimprinting on optical fiber end faces for chemical sensing,” Proc. SPIE 7004, 70042H(2008). [CrossRef]
  14. J. Viheriala, T. Niemi, J. Kontio, T. Rytkonen, and M. Pessa, “Fabrication of surface reliefs on facets of singlemode optical fibres using nanoimprint lithography,” Electron. Lett. 43, 150–151 (2007). [CrossRef]
  15. D. L. Brundrett, E. N. Glytsis, and T. K. Gaylord, “Homogeneous layer models for high-spatial-frequency dielectric surface-relief gratings: conical diffraction and antireflection designs,” Appl. Opt. 33, 2695–2706 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. D. H. Raguin and G. M. Morris, “Antireflection structured surfaces for the infrared spectral region,” Appl. Opt. 32, 1154–1167 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. G. Ehret, E. Buhr, S. Gabler, and H.-M. Bitzer, “Broadband optical antireflection of plastic optics by molded stochastic sub-wavelength structures,” Plasma Process. Polym. 6, S840(2009). [CrossRef]
  18. The period, or feature separation, is around 920nm.
  19. W. H. Southwell, “Pyramid-array surface-relief structures producing antireflection index matching on optical surfaces,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 549–553 (1991). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited