OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 50, Iss. 2 — Jan. 10, 2011
  • pp: 183–193

Resolution analysis of a digital holography system

Yan Hao and Anand Asundi  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 50, Issue 2, pp. 183-193 (2011)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1600 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Although digital holography (DH) has many advantages compared to conventional holography, its resolution is limited due to CCDs or other recording devices. Three factors contribute to this limitation, namely, the pixel averaging effect within the finite detection size of one pixel, a finite CCD aperture size limitation, and the sampling effect due to a finite sampling interval. In this paper, interactions of the three factors on resolution are investigated and presented. The resolution of a DH system can be determined for given parameters of these three factors. The domains dominated by different factors are explained along with their accuracy. As a DH system is space variant, influences of object extent on resolution are also discussed. The resolution performance of in-line and off-axis systems is studied and examples of resolution determination for a practical system are provided.

© 2011 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.6890) Image processing : Three-dimensional image processing
(110.6880) Imaging systems : Three-dimensional image acquisition
(090.1995) Holography : Digital holography

ToC Category:

Original Manuscript: October 5, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: November 17, 2010
Published: January 7, 2011

Yan Hao and Anand Asundi, "Resolution analysis of a digital holography system," Appl. Opt. 50, 183-193 (2011)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. D. Gabor, “A new microscopic principle,” Nature 161, 777–778 (1948). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. U. Schnars and W. Juptner, “Direct recording of holograms by a CCD target and numerical reconstruction,” Appl. Opt. 33, 179–181 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. U. Schnars, “Direct phase determination in hologram interferometry with use of digitally recorded holograms,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 2011–2015 (1994). [CrossRef]
  4. U. Schnars and W. P. O. Juptner, “Digital recording and numerical reconstruction of holograms,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 13, R85–R101 (2002). [CrossRef]
  5. L. Xu, X. Y. Peng, A. K. Asundi, and J. M. Miao, “Hybrid holographic microscope for interferometric measurement of microstructures,” Opt. Eng. 40, 2533–2539 (2001). [CrossRef]
  6. L. Xu, X. Y. Peng, J. M. Miao, and A. K. Asundi, “Studies of digital microscopic holography with applications to microstructure testing,” Appl. Opt. 40, 5046–5051 (2001). [CrossRef]
  7. V. R. Singh, J. M. Miao, Z. H. Wang, G. Hegde, and A. Asundi, “Dynamic characterization of MEMS diaphragm using time averaged in-line digital holography,” Opt. Commun. 280, 285–290 (2007). [CrossRef]
  8. A. Asundi and V. R. Singh, “Amplitude and phase analysis in digital dynamic holography,” Opt. Lett. 31, 2420–2422 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. P. Marquet, B. Rappaz, P. J. Magistretti, E. Cuche, Y. Emery, T. Colomb, and C. Depeursinge, “Digital holographic microscopy: a noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy,” Opt. Lett. 30, 468–470 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. E. Cuche, F. Bevilacqua, and C. Depeursinge, “Digital holography for quantitative phase-contrast imaging,” Opt. Lett. 24, 291–293 (1999). [CrossRef]
  11. C. Wagner, S. Seebacher, W. Osten, and W. Juptner, “Digital recording and numerical reconstruction of lensless Fourier holograms in optical metrology,” Appl. Opt. 38, 4812–4820(1999). [CrossRef]
  12. J. Garcia-Sucerquia, W. B. Xu, S. K. Jericho, P. Klages, M. H. Jericho, and H. J. Kreuzer, “Digital in-line holographic microscopy,” Appl. Opt. 45, 836–850 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. H. Z. Jin, H. Wan, Y. P. Zhang, Y. Li, and P. Z. Qiu, “The influence of structural parameters of CCD on the reconstruction image of digital holograms,” J. Mod. Opt. 55, 2989–3000 (2008). [CrossRef]
  14. D. P. Kelly, B. M. Hennelly, C. McElhinney, and T. J. Naughton, “A practical guide to digital holography and generalized sampling,” Proc. SPIE 7072, 707215 (2008). [CrossRef]
  15. L. Xu, X. Y. Peng, Z. X. Guo, J. M. Miao, and A. Asundi, “Imaging analysis of digital holography,” Opt. Express 13, 2444–2452 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. A. Stern and B. Javidi, “Analysis of practical sampling and reconstruction from Fresnel fields,” Opt. Eng. 43, 239–250(2004). [CrossRef]
  17. P. Picart, J. Leval, D. Mounier, and S. Gougeon, “Some opportunities for vibration analysis with time averaging in digital Fresnel holography,” Appl. Opt. 44, 337–343 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. P. Picart and J. Leval, “General theoretical formulation of image formation in digital Fresnel holography,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25, 1744–1761 (2008). [CrossRef]
  19. D. P. Kelly, B. M. Hennelly, N. Pandey, T. J. Naughton, and W. T. Rhodes, “Resolution limits in practical digital holographic systems,” Opt. Eng. 48 (2009). [CrossRef]
  20. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, 1996).
  21. T. Kreis, Handbook of Holographic Interferometry, Optical and Digital Methods (Wiley-VCH, 2005), pp. 47–53.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited