OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 50, Iss. 27 — Sep. 20, 2011
  • pp: 5263–5270

Improvement of digital photoelasticity based on camera response function

Shih-Hsin Chang and Hsien-Huang P. Wu  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 50, Issue 27, pp. 5263-5270 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.005263


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (579 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Studies on photoelasticity have been conducted by many researchers in recent years, and many equations for photoelastic analysis based on digital images were proposed. While these equations were all presented by the light intensity emitted from the analyzer, pixel values of the digital image were actually used in the real calculations. In this paper, a proposal of using relative light intensity obtained by the camera response function to replace the pixel value for photoelastic analysis was investigated. Generation of isochromatic images based on relative light intensity and pixel value were compared to evaluate the effectiveness of the new approach. The results showed that when relative light intensity was used, the quality of an isochromatic image can be greatly improved both visually and quantitatively. We believe that the technique proposed in this paper can also be used to improve the performance for the other types of photoelastic analysis using digital images.

© 2011 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.2000) Image processing : Digital image processing
(120.4290) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Nondestructive testing

ToC Category:
Instrumentation, Measurement, and Metrology

History
Original Manuscript: March 23, 2011
Revised Manuscript: June 4, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: August 2, 2011
Published: September 15, 2011

Citation
Shih-Hsin Chang and Hsien-Huang P. Wu, "Improvement of digital photoelasticity based on camera response function," Appl. Opt. 50, 5263-5270 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-50-27-5263


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. Asundi, L. Tong, and C. G. Boay, “Phase-shifting method with a normal polariscope,” Appl. Opt. 38, 5931–5935 (1999). [CrossRef]
  2. M. J. Huang and P.-C. Sung, “Regional phase unwrapping algorithm for photoelastic phase map,” Opt. Express 18, 1419–1429 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. P. Pinit and E. Umezaki, “Digitally whole-field analysis of isoclinic parameter in photoelasticity by four-step color phase-shifting technique,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 45, 795–807(2007). [CrossRef]
  4. D. Zhang, Y. Han, B. Zhang, and D. Arola, “Automatic determination of parameters in photoelasticity,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 45, 860–867 (2007). [CrossRef]
  5. Z. Lei, D. Yun, and W. Yu, “Whole-field determination of isoclinic parameter by five-step color phase shifting and its error analysis,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 40, 189–200 (2003). [CrossRef]
  6. K. Ramesh and S. K. Mangal, “Data acquisition techniques in digital photoelasticity: a review,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 30, 53–75 (1998). [CrossRef]
  7. F. W. Hecker and B. Morche, “Computer-aided measurement of relative retardation in plane photoelasticity,” in Experimental Stress Analysis, H.Wieringa (ed.) (Martinus Nijhoff, 1986), pp. 535–542. [CrossRef]
  8. J. Jirousek and A. Venkatesh, “Generation of optimal assumed stress expansions for hybrid-stress elements,” Comput. Struct. 32, 1413–1417 (1989). [CrossRef]
  9. S. A. Mueller and F. A. Moslehy, “An image analysis technique for constructing isostatics from isoclinics in photoelasticity,” Proc. SPIE 2066, 53–62 (1993). [CrossRef]
  10. C. Buckberry and D. Towers, “New approaches to the full-field analysis of photoelastic stress patterns,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 24, 415–428 (1996). [CrossRef]
  11. N. Plouzennec, J. C. Dupre, and A. Logarde, “Whole field determination of isoclinic and isochromatic parameters,” Exp. Tech. 23, 30–33 (1999). [CrossRef]
  12. M. D. Grossberg and S. K. Nayar, “Modeling the space of camera response functions,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 26, 1272–1282 (2004). [CrossRef]
  13. D. A. Forsyth and J. Ponce, Computer Vision: A Modern Approach (Prentice-Hall, 2003).
  14. P. E. Debevec and J. Malik, “Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs,” in Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH (ACM Press, 1997), pp. 369–378.
  15. G. Healey and R. Kondepudy, “Radiometric CCD camera calibration and noise estimation,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 16, 267–276 (1994). [CrossRef]
  16. F. M. Candocia and D. A. Mandarino, “A semiparametric model for accurate camera response function modeling and exposure estimation from comparametric data,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14, 1138–1150 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited