OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 50, Iss. 28 — Oct. 1, 2011
  • pp: 5538–5544

Use of a field lens for improving the overlap function of a lidar system employing an optical fiber in the receiver assembly

Adolfo Comeron, Michaël Sicard, Dhiraj Kumar, and Francesc Rocadenbosch  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 50, Issue 28, pp. 5538-5544 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.005538


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (743 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

This paper presents a method to compute the overlap function of a lidar system in which a step-index optical fiber (or a bundle of such fibers) is used to carry the light collected by the telescope to the photoreceiver and a field lens is placed between the telescope and the optical fiber to increase the receiver field of view (FOV). The use of field lenses is a classical way to increase the FOV of radiometric systems (such as the receiving part of a lidar) when there is no numerical aperture (NA) limitation after the lens. However, when such a limitation exists, as in the case studied here, it will place a limit on the maximum attainable FOV. In the case of lidars, which have range-resolution capabilities, the limited FOV has an effect on the fraction of power coming from scattering volumes at different ranges that actually reaches the photodetector. This fraction is a function (the so-called overlap function) of the range of the scattering volume and its behavior has an impact on the accuracy of the retrievals. The application of the method developed in this paper shows that, in spite of the fiber NA limit, in practical situations the goal is attained of making the overlap function steeper and reaching higher values by using a field lens.

© 2011 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.1110) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Aerosols
(010.3640) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Lidar
(080.0080) Geometric optics : Geometric optics
(280.3640) Remote sensing and sensors : Lidar

ToC Category:
Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics

History
Original Manuscript: May 10, 2011
Revised Manuscript: July 20, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: July 29, 2011
Published: September 30, 2011

Citation
Adolfo Comeron, Michaël Sicard, Dhiraj Kumar, and Francesc Rocadenbosch, "Use of a field lens for improving the overlap function of a lidar system employing an optical fiber in the receiver assembly," Appl. Opt. 50, 5538-5544 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-50-28-5538


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. G. Pappalardo, J. Bösenberg, A. Amodeo, A. Ansmann, A. Apituley, L. A. Arboledas, D. Balis, C. Böckmann, A. Chaikovsky, A. Comeron, G. D’Amico, V. Freudenthaler, I. Gigorov, G. Hanson, H. Linné, I. Mattis, L. Mona, D. Mueller, V. Mitev, D. Nicolae, A. Papayannis, M. R. Perrone, A. Pietruczuk, M. Pujadas, J.-P. Putaud, F. Ravetta, V. Rizi, V. Simeonov, N. Spinelli, T. Trickl, U. Wandinger, and M. Wiegner, “EARLINET for long term observations of aerosol over EUROPE,” in Reviewed and Revised Papers Presented at 24th International Laser Radar Conference, M.Hardesty and S.Mayor, eds. (Organizing Committee of the 24th International Laser Radar Conference, 2008), pp. 711–714.
  2. J. Riegl and M. Bernhard, “Empfangsleistung in Abhängigkeit von der Zielentfernung bei optischen Kurzstrecken-Radargeräten,” Appl. Opt. 13, 931–936 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. T. Halldórsson and J. Langerholc, “Geometrical form factors for the lidar function,” Appl. Opt. 17, 240–244 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. J. Harms, W. Lahmann, and C. Weitkamp, “Geometrical compression of lidar return signals,” Appl. Opt. 17, 1131–1135(1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. J. Harms, “Lidar return signals for coaxial and noncoaxial systems with central obstruction,” Appl. Opt. 18, 1559–1566(1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. J. R. Jenness, Jr., D. B. Lysak, Jr., and C. R. Philbrick, “Design of a lidar receiver with fiber-optic output,” Appl. Opt. 36, 4278–4284 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. G. Chourdakis, A. Papayannis, and J. Porteneuve, “Analysis of the receiver response for a noncoaxial lidar system with fiber-optic output,” Appl. Opt. 41, 2715–2723 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. J. R. Campbell, D. L. Hvlaka, E. J. Welton, C. J. Flynn, D. D. Turner, J. D. Spinhirne, V. S. Scott III, and I. H. Wang, “Full-time, eye-safe cloud and aerosol lidar observation at atmospheric radiation measurement program sites: instruments and data processing,” J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 19, 431–442(2002). [CrossRef]
  9. U. Wandinger and A. Ansmann, “Experimental determination of the lidar overlap profile with Raman lidar,” Appl. Opt. 41, 511–514 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. A. Ansmann, U. Wandinger, M. Riebesell, C. Weitkamp, and W. Michaelis, “Independent measurement of extinction and backscatter profiles in cirrus clouds by using a combined Raman elastic-backscatter lidar,” Appl. Opt. 31, 7113–7131(1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. P. T. Brunozzi and F. Marenco, “A lidar for water vapour measurements in daytime at Lampedusa, Italy,” Ann. Geophys. 46, 459–465 (2003).
  12. A. I. Abramochkin and A. A. Tikhomirov, “Optimization of a lidar receiving system. 2. Spatial filters,” Atmos. Oceanic Opt. 12, 331–342 (1999).
  13. R. R. Agishev and A. Comeron, “Spatial filtering efficiency of monostatic biaxial lidar: analysis and applications,” Appl. Opt. 41, 7516–7521 (2002). [CrossRef]
  14. V. Freudenthaler, “Optimized background suppression in near field lidar telescopes,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Tropospheric Profiling: Needs and Technologies (ISTP 2003), U.Wandinger, R.Engelmann, and K.Schmieder, eds. (Institute for Tropospheric Research, 2003), pp. 243–245.
  15. K. Sassen and G. Dodd, “Lidar crossover function and misalignment effects,” Appl. Opt. 21, 3162–3165 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Y. Sasano, H. Shimizu, N. Takeuchi, and M. Okuda, “Geometrical form factor in the laser radar equation: an experimental determination,” Appl. Opt. 18, 3908–3910 (1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. S. Hu, X. Wang, Y. Wu, C. Li, and H. Hu, “Geometrical form factor determination with Raman backscattering signals,” Opt. Lett. 30, 1879–1881 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. V. Freudenthaler, “The Telecover Test: a quality assurance tool for the optical part of a lidar system,” in Reviewed and Revised Papers Presented at 23th International Laser Radar Conference, C.Nagasawa and N.Sugimoto, eds. (Organizing Committee of the 23th International Laser Radar Conference, 2006), pp. 145–146.
  19. W. J. Smith, Modern Optical Engineering (McGraw-Hill, 2008).
  20. R. M. Measures, Laser Remote Sensing: Fundamentals and Applications (Wiley, 1984).
  21. H. W. Kogelnik and T. Li, “Laser beams and resonators,” Proc. IEEE 54, 1312–1329 (1966). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited