OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 51, Iss. 10 — Apr. 1, 2012
  • pp: 1479–1486

Kernel-based parametric analytical model of source intensity distributions in lithographic tools

Shiyuan Liu, Wei Liu, Xinjiang Zhou, and Peng Gong  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 51, Issue 10, pp. 1479-1486 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.51.001479


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1214 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

This paper proposes a parametric analytical source model for overall representation of the physical distribution property of partially coherent illumination sources in lithographic tools. A set of smooth kernels is adopted to construct the analytical model for the multiple mainstream illumination sources. Corrected parametrical terms are subsequently presented for characterization of different physical distortions of and deviations from actual illumination sources. The corrected parametrical terms can be decomposed into Fourier series, which have special physical meanings of respectively indicating different distortion types, including shift of the center, tilt, and ellipticity, etc. We fully expected that the proposed analytical model will provide both simulation conditions and a theoretical basis for the resolution enhancement technique and related research fields.

© 2012 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(110.2990) Imaging systems : Image formation theory
(110.4980) Imaging systems : Partial coherence in imaging
(110.5220) Imaging systems : Photolithography
(230.6080) Optical devices : Sources

ToC Category:
Imaging Systems

History
Original Manuscript: October 24, 2011
Revised Manuscript: December 10, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: December 11, 2011
Published: March 23, 2012

Citation
Shiyuan Liu, Wei Liu, Xinjiang Zhou, and Peng Gong, "Kernel-based parametric analytical model of source intensity distributions in lithographic tools," Appl. Opt. 51, 1479-1486 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-51-10-1479


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. F. M. Schellenberg, “A history of resolution enhancement technology,” Opt. Rev. 12, 83–89 (2005). [CrossRef]
  2. A. K. Wong, Optical Imaging in Projection Microlithography (SPIE, 2005), Chap. 4.
  3. B. J. Lin, Optical Lithography: Here is Why (SPIE, 2010), Chap. 3.
  4. E. Wolf, “New spectral representation of random sources and of the partially coherent fields that they generate,” Opt. Commun. 38, 3–6 (1981). [CrossRef]
  5. G. Perçin, A. Sezginer, and F. X. Zach, “Metrology for stepper illumination pupil profile,” J. Micro/nanolithogr. MEMS MOEMS 5, 023006 (2006).
  6. X. Ma and G. R. Arce, “PSM design for inverse lithography with partially coherent illumination,” Opt. Express 16, 20126–20141 (2008). [CrossRef]
  7. K. Yamazoe, “Fast fine-pixel aerial image calculation in partially coherent imaging by matrix representation of modified Hopkins equation,” Appl. Opt. 49, 3909–3915 (2010). [CrossRef]
  8. W. Liu, S. Y. Liu, T. T. Zhou, and L. J. Wang, “Aerial image based technique for measurement of lens aberrations up to 37th Zernike coefficient in lithographic tools under partial coherent illumination,” Opt. Express 17, 19278–19291 (2009). [CrossRef]
  9. C. Bodendorf, R. E. Schlief, and R. Ziebold, “Impact of measured pupil illumination fill distribution on lithography simulation and OPC models,” Proc. SPIE 5377, 1130–1145 (2004).
  10. J. Shin, C. Hwang, S. Lee, S. Woo, H. Cho, and J. Moon, “Understanding the impact of source displacement error on sub-90 nm patterns using a fresnel zone plate,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 23, 2653–2656 (2005). [CrossRef]
  11. W. Liu, S. Y. Liu, T. L. Shi, and Z. R. Tang, “Generalized formulations for aerial image based lens aberration metrology in lithographic tools with arbitrarily shaped illumination sources,” Opt. Express 18, 20096–20104 (2010). [CrossRef]
  12. E. Barouch, S. L. Knodle, S. A. Orszag, and M. Yeung, “Illuminator optimization for projection printing,” Proc. SPIE 3679, 697–703 (1999).
  13. T. C. Barrett, “Impact of illumination pupil-fill spatial variation on simulated imaging performance,” Proc. SPIE 4000, 804–817 (2000).
  14. Y. Granik, “Source optimization for image fidelity and throughput,” J. Micro/nanolithogr. MEMS MOEMS 3, 509–522 (2004). [CrossRef]
  15. Y. Granik and K. Adam, “Analytical approximations of the source intensity distributions,” Proc. SPIE 5992, 599255 (2005).
  16. D. G. Flagello, B. Geh, R. Socha, P. Liu, Y. Cao, R. Stas, O. Natt, and J. Zimmermann, “Understanding illumination effects for control of optical proximity effects (OPE),” Proc. SPIE 6924, 69241U (2008).
  17. T. Matsuyama, N. Kita, and Y. Mizuno, “Pupilgram adjusting scheme using intelligent illuminator for ArF immersion exposure tool,” Proc. SPIE 7973, 79731H (2011).
  18. H. van der Laan, M. Dierichs, H. van Greevenbroek, E. McCoo, F. Stoffels, R. Pongers, and R. Willekers, “Aerial image measurement methods for fast aberration setup and illumination pupil verification,” Proc. SPIE 4346, 394–407 (2001).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited