OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 51, Iss. 19 — Jul. 1, 2012
  • pp: 4520–4535

Comparison of vibration mitigation controllers for adaptive optics systems

Andres Guesalaga, Benoit Neichel, Francois Rigaut, James Osborn, and Dani Guzman  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 51, Issue 19, pp. 4520-4535 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.51.004520


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1681 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Vibrations are detrimental to the performance of modern adaptive optics (AO) systems. In this paper, we describe new methods tested to mitigate the vibrations encountered in some of the instruments of the Gemini South telescope. By implementing a spectral analysis of the slope measurements from several wavefront sensors and an imager, we can determine the frequencies and magnitude of these vibrations. We found a persistent vibration at 55 Hz with others occurring occasionally at 14 and 100 Hz. Two types of AO controllers were designed and implemented, Kalman and H, in the multiconjugate AO tip–tilt loop. The first results show a similar performance for these advanced controllers and a clear improvement in vibration rejection and overall performance over the classical integrator scheme. It is shown that the reduction in the standard deviation of the residual slopes (as measured by wavefront sensors) is highly dependent on turbulence, wind speed, and vibration conditions, ranging—in terms of slopes RMS value—from an almost negligible reduction for high speed wind to a factor of 5 for a combination of low wind and strong vibrations.

© 2012 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.1080) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Active or adaptive optics
(120.7280) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Vibration analysis

ToC Category:
Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics

History
Original Manuscript: March 1, 2012
Revised Manuscript: May 4, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: May 21, 2012
Published: June 29, 2012

Citation
Andres Guesalaga, Benoit Neichel, Francois Rigaut, James Osborn, and Dani Guzman, "Comparison of vibration mitigation controllers for adaptive optics systems," Appl. Opt. 51, 4520-4535 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-51-19-4520


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. Y. Clenet, M. Kasper, N. Ageorges, C. Lidman, T. Fusco, O. P. Marco, M. Hartung, D. Mouillet, B. Koehler, G. Rousset, and N. Hubin, “NAOS performances: impact of the telescope vibrations and possible origins,” in Semaine de l’Astrophysique Francaise (EdP Sciences, 2004), p. 179.
  2. J. Maly, E. Darren, and T. Pargett, “Vibration suppression for the Gemini planet image,” Proc. SPIE 7733, 77331F (2010). [CrossRef]
  3. Y. Clenet, M. Kasper, N. Ageorges, C. Lidman, T. Fusco, G. Rousset, O. Marco, M. Hartung, D. Mouillet, B. Koehler, and N. Hubin, “NACO performance: status after 2 years of operation,” Proc. SPIE 5490, 107–117 (2004). [CrossRef]
  4. J. P. Verán and L. Poyneer, “Evaluation of the T/T conditions at Gemini South using NICI AO telemetry data,” in First AO4ELT Conference (EdP Sciences, 2009), p. 05002.
  5. J. Christou, C. Trujillo, B. Neichel, F. Rigaut, B. Walls, D. Coulson, J. White, A. Stephens, and M. Sheehan, “The effect of the instrument environment on the Altair AO system,” presented at Second AO4ELT Conference, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 25–30Sept.2011.
  6. C. Petit, J.-M. Conan, C. Kulcsár, and H. F. Raynaud, “Linear quadratic Gaussian control for adaptive optics and multiconjugate adaptive optics: experimental and numerical analysis,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26, 1307–1325 (2009). [CrossRef]
  7. C. Petit, J. M. Conan, T. Fusco, J. Montri, C. Kulcsár, H. F. Raynaud, and D. Rabaud, “First laboratory demonstration of closed-loop Kalman based optimal control for vibration filtering and simplified MCAO,” Proc. SPIE 6272, 62721T (2006). [CrossRef]
  8. B. Neichel, F. Rigaut, A. Guesalaga, I. Rodriguez, and D. Guzman, “Kalman and H-infinity controllers for GeMS,” in Imaging Systems Applications OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2011), paper JWA32.
  9. G. Agapito, F. Quirós-Pacheco, P. Tesi, A. Riccardi, and S. Esposito, “Observer-based control techniques for the LBT adaptive optics under telescope vibrations,” Eur. J. Control 17, 316–326 (2011). [CrossRef]
  10. J. M. Conan, H. F. Raynaud, C. Kulcsár, and S. Meimon, “Are integral controllers adapted to the new era of ELT adaptive optics?” presented at Second AO4ELT Conference, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 25–30Sept.2011.
  11. E. Fedrigo, R. Muradore, and D. Zilio, “High performance adaptive optics system with fine tip/tilt control,” Contr. Eng. Pract. 17, 122–135 (2009). [CrossRef]
  12. B. Le Roux, J. M. Conan, C. Kulcsár, H. F. Raynaud, L. M. Mugnier, and T. Fusco, “Optimal control law for classical and multiconjugate adaptative optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21, 1261–1276 (2004). [CrossRef]
  13. C. Kulcsár, H.-F. Raynaud, C. Petit, J.-M. Conan, and P. Viaris de Lesegno, “Optimal control, observers and integrators in adaptive optics,” Opt. Express 14, 7464–7476 (2006). [CrossRef]
  14. J. C. Doyle, K. Glover, P. P. Khargonekar, and B. A. Francis, “State-space solutions to standard H2 and H∞ control problems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 34, 831–847(1989). [CrossRef]
  15. M. G. Safonov, D. J. N. Limebeer, and R. Y. Chiang, “Simplifying the H∞ theory via loop shifting, matrix pencil and descriptor concepts,” Int. J. Contr. 50, 2467–2488 (1989). [CrossRef]
  16. B. Bamieh and J. B. Pearson, “A general framework for linear periodic systems with application to H∞ sampled-data control,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 37, 418–435(1992). [CrossRef]
  17. B. L. Ellerbroek and F. Rigaut, “Methods for correcting tilt anisoplanatism in laser-guide-star-based multiconjugate adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2539–2547(2001). [CrossRef]
  18. B. Neichel, F. Rigaut, M. Bec, M. Boccas, F. Daruich, C. D’Orgeville, V. Fesquet, R. Galvez, A. Garcia-Rissmann, G. Gausachs, M. Lombini, G. Perez, G. Trancho, V. Upadhya, and T. Vucina, “The Gemini MCAO systems GeMS: nearing the end of a lab-story,” Proc. SPIE 7736, 773606 (2010). [CrossRef]
  19. F. Rigaut and B. Neichel, “Gemini South MCAO on-sky results,” presented at Second AO4ELT Conference, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 25–30Sept.2011.
  20. J. M. Conan, G. Rousset, and P. Y. Madec, “Wave-front temporal spectra in high-resolution imaging through turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 1559–1570 (1995). [CrossRef]
  21. E. Gendron and P. Lena, “Astronomical adaptive optics I. modal control optimization,” Astron. Astrophys. 291, 337–347 (1994).
  22. C. Correia, H. F. Raynaud, C. Kulcsár, and J. M. Conan, “On the optimal reconstruction and control of adaptive optical systems with mirror dynamics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, 333–349 (2010). [CrossRef]
  23. S. Meimon, C. Petit, T. Fusco, and C. Kulcsár, “Tip–tilt disturbance model identification for Kalman-based control scheme: application to XAO and ELT systems,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, A122–A132 (2010). [CrossRef]
  24. C. Dessenne, P.-Y. Madec, and G. Rousset, “Modal prediction for closed-loop adaptive optics,” Opt. Lett. 22, 1535–1537 (1997). [CrossRef]
  25. C. Mohtadi, “Bode’s integral theorem for discrete-time systems,” IEE Proc. D Contr. Theory Appl. 137, 57–66(1990). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited