OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 51, Iss. 20 — Jul. 10, 2012
  • pp: 4754–4767

Autonomous calibration method of the reference flat surface of an interferometer without using a standard flat surface

Ikumatsu Fujimoto, Toshiyuki Takatsuji, Kunitoshi Nishimura, and Min Young Kim  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 51, Issue 20, pp. 4754-4767 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.51.004754


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (653 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

An autonomous method for calibrating the reference flat surface of an interferometer is proposed with the uncertainty analysis. The method consists of three phases; the first step is multiple rotating shifts of a specimen, the second is a linear shift, and the last is multiple rotating shifts again. The profile of the reference flat surface is basically determined by the linear shift. The linear shift errors that occurred during the linear shift are identified by the rotating shifts. The rotating shift errors caused by the rotating shifts can be compensated and the residual uncertainty can be reduced in proportion to the square root of the number of rotating shifts per one revolution. Finally, the uncertainty analysis is carried out in detail.

© 2012 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(120.3180) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Interferometry
(150.1135) Machine vision : Algorithms
(150.1488) Machine vision : Calibration

ToC Category:
Instrumentation, Measurement, and Metrology

History
Original Manuscript: January 31, 2012
Revised Manuscript: April 10, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: May 2, 2012
Published: July 9, 2012

Citation
Ikumatsu Fujimoto, Toshiyuki Takatsuji, Kunitoshi Nishimura, and Min Young Kim, "Autonomous calibration method of the reference flat surface of an interferometer without using a standard flat surface," Appl. Opt. 51, 4754-4767 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-51-20-4754


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. F. T. Farago and M. A. Curtis, Handbook of Dimensional Measurement (Industrial, 1994).
  2. R. Thalmann, “Straightness and alignment,” in Handbook of Optical Metrology, T. Yoshizawa, ed. (CRC, 2009), Sec. 17, pp. 411–421.
  3. D. Malacara, Handbook of Optical Shop Testing (Wiley, 1992).
  4. W. T. Estler, “Calibration and use of optical straightedges in the metrology of precision machines,” Opt. Eng. 24, 372–379 (1985).
  5. D. Moore, “Design considerations in multi-probe roundness measurement,” J Phys: E. Sci. Instrum. 22, 339–343 (1989). [CrossRef]
  6. Kuroda Precision Industries, “Measuring system: Nanometoro 300TT,” http://www.kuroda-precision.co.jp/products/sokutei/nano/sokutei08.htm .
  7. W. Gao, J. Yokoyama, and K. Kiyono, “Straightness measurement of cylinder by multi-probe method,” Precis. Eng. 28, 279–289 (2002). [CrossRef]
  8. J. Yamaguchi, “Measurement of straight motion accuracy using the improved sequential three-point method,” J. Jpn. Soc. Precis. Eng. 59, 773–778 (1993) [in Japanese]. [CrossRef]
  9. T. Kume, K. Enami, Y. Higashi, and K. Ueno, “Zero difference in straightness using 3-point method,” J. Jpn. Soc. Precis. Eng. 75, 657–662 (2009) [in Japanese]. [CrossRef]
  10. I. Fujimoto, K. Nishimura, and Y. Pyun, “Autonomous calibration method of the zero-difference without using a standard gauge for a straightness-measuring machine,” Precis. Eng. 35, 153–163 (2011). [CrossRef]
  11. I. Fujimoto, K. Nishimura, T. Takatsuji, and Y. Pyoun, “A study on the relationship between measurement uncertainty and the size of the disc gauge used to calibrate a straightness measuring system,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 22, 125201 (2011). [CrossRef]
  12. I. Fujimoto, K. Nishimura, T. Takatsuji, and Y. Pyun, “A Technique to Measure the Flatness of next-generation 450 mm wafers using a three-point method with an autonomous calibration function,” Precis. Eng. 36, 270–280 (2012). [CrossRef]
  13. T. Takatsuji, N. Ueki, K. Hibino, S. Osawa, and T. Kurosawa, “Japanese ultimate flatness interferometer and its preliminary experiment,” Proc. SPIE 4401, 83–90 (2001). [CrossRef]
  14. U. Griesmann, Q. Wang, M. Tricard, P. Dumas, and C. Hill, “Manufacture and metrology of 300 mm silicon wafers with ultra-low thickness variations,” in Proceedings of Characterization and Metrology for Nanoelectronics International Conference on Frontiers of Characterization and Metrology, p. 931 (2007).
  15. B. F. Oreb, D. I. Farrant, C. J. Walsh, G. Forbes, and P. S. Fairman, “Calibration of a 300 mm-aperture phase-shifting Fizeau interferometer,” Appl. Opt. 39, 5161–5171 (2000). [CrossRef]
  16. G. Schulz and J. Schwider, “Precise measurement of planeness,” Appl. Opt. 6, 1077–1084 (1967). [CrossRef]
  17. B. S. Fritz, “Absolute calibration of an optical flat,” Opt. Eng. 23, 379–383 (1984).
  18. C. Ai and J. C. Wyant, “Absolute testing of flats by using even and odd functions,” Appl. Opt. 32, 4698–4705 (1993). [CrossRef]
  19. C. J. Evans and R. N. Kestner, “Test optics error removal,” Appl. Opt. 35, 1015–1021 (1996). [CrossRef]
  20. M. F. Küchel, “A new approach to solve the three flat problem,” Optik 112, 381–391 (2001). [CrossRef]
  21. K. R. Freischlad, “Absolute interferometric testing based on reconstruction of rotational shear,” Appl. Opt. 40, 1637–1648 (2001). [CrossRef]
  22. U. Griesmann, “Three-flat test solutions based on simple mirror symmetry,” Appl. Opt. 45, 5856–5865 (2006). [CrossRef]
  23. U. Griesmann, Q. Wang, and J. Soons, “A comparison of three-flat tests,” in Frontiers in Optics, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2006), paper OFMC3.
  24. U. Griesmann, Q. Wang, and J. Soons, “Three-flat tests including mounting-induced deformations,” Opt. Eng. 46, 093601 (2007). [CrossRef]
  25. S. Kiyono, W. Gao, and H. Seio, “Theoretical study on absolute measurement method of surface shape by interferograms,” J. Jpn. Soc. Precis. Eng. 64, 1137–1145 (1998) [in Japanese].
  26. R. Mercier, M. Lamare, P. Picart, and J. P. Marioge, “Two-flat method for bi-dimensional measurement of absolute departure from the best sphere,” Pure Appl. Opt. 6, 117–126 (1997). [CrossRef]
  27. A. Sonosaki, K. Iwata, and Y. Iwasaki, “Measurement of profiles along a circle on two flat surfaces by use of a Fizeau interferometer with no standard,” Appl. Opt. 42, 6853–6858 (2003). [CrossRef]
  28. T. Ito, T. Hinaji, and O. Horiuchi, “High precision flatness measurement by combing two-orientation method and radial shift method,” J. Jpn. Soc. Precis. Eng. 58, 883–886 (1992) [in Japanese].
  29. I. Fujimoto and T. Lee, “Self-calibration algorithm of systematic errors for interferometer,” J. Kor. Soc. Precis. Eng. 22(5), 63–71 (2005) [in Korean].
  30. International Organization for Standardization, “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” (ISO, 1995).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited