OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 51, Iss. 4 — Feb. 1, 2012
  • pp: A91–A98

Spectrally reconfigurable pixels for dual-color-mode imaging sensors

Giacomo Langfelder  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 51, Issue 4, pp. A91-A98 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.51.000A91


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1102 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The use of full color-sensitive photodetectors with three electrically tunable spectral responses allows the design of sensors that can be real-time reconfigured for different color acquisition modes. All the (physically identical) pixels can be biased in the same way, each giving the same set of RGB spectral responses: in this situation the conversion from the sensor color space to a reference color space can be implemented as usual, giving typical color errors ΔEa,b in the order of 2–3. Alternatively, pixels can be biased in two different ways (e.g., row by row), forming pairs: by joining the information from adjacent pixels, the sensor has six spectral responses, with a reduced resolution. By exploiting this plurality of spectral responses, color reproduction accuracy can be increased. In this work, an improved design of the Transverse Field Detector, a filterless and tunable three-color pixel, is used as the experimental device to propose a dual-color-mode reconfigurable sensor.

© 2012 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.2000) Image processing : Digital image processing
(330.1710) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color, measurement
(110.4234) Imaging systems : Multispectral and hyperspectral imaging
(250.0040) Optoelectronics : Detectors

History
Original Manuscript: September 7, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: November 28, 2011
Published: February 1, 2012

Citation
Giacomo Langfelder, "Spectrally reconfigurable pixels for dual-color-mode imaging sensors," Appl. Opt. 51, A91-A98 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-51-4-A91


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. El Gamal and H. Eltoukhy, “CMOS image sensors,” IEEE Circuits Devices Mag. 21(3), 6–20 (2005). [CrossRef]
  2. B. A. Wandell and L. D. Silverstein, “Digital color reproduction,” in The Science of Color (Elsevier, 2003), pp. 281–316.
  3. E. R. Fossum, “CMOS image sensors: Electronic camera-on-a-chip,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 44, 1689–1698, (1997). [CrossRef]
  4. Poorvi L. Vora and H. Joel Trussell, “Measure of goodness of a set of color-scanning filters,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 1499–1508 (1993). [CrossRef]
  5. G. Sharma and H. J. Trussell, “Figures of merit for color scanners,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 6, 990–1001 (1997). [CrossRef]
  6. J. Farrell and B. Wandell, “Method and apparatus for identifying the color of an image,” U.S. patent 5,479,524 (26December1995).
  7. J. Farrell, D. Sherman, and B. Wandell, “How to turn your scanner into a colorimeter,” in IS&T Tenth International Congress on Advances in Non-Impact Printing Technologies (1994), pp. 579–581.
  8. Sony Corporation, “Realization of natural color reproduction in digital still cameras, closer to the natural sight perception of the human eye,” Sony technology development Article No. 03-029E (2003).
  9. G. D. Finlayson and M. S. Drew, “The maximum ignorance assumption with positivity,” in IS&T Fourth Color Imaging Conference (The Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 1996), Vol. 4, pp. 202–205.
  10. P. J. Miller, “Colorimetric imaging system,” U.S. patent 6,760,475 B1 (6July2004).
  11. G. Langfelder, F. Zaraga, and A. Longoni, “Experimental characterization of a CMOS pixel with a tunable color space,” in Proceedings of the 18th Color Imaging Conference (CIC) (The Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 2010), pp. 166–171.
  12. U. Barnhöfer, J. M. Di Carlo, B. Olding, and B. A. Wandell, “Color estimation error trade-offs,” Proc. SPIE 5017, 263–273(2003).
  13. G. Langfelder, F. Zaraga, and A. Longoni, “Tunable spectral responses in a color-sensitive CMOS pixel for imaging applications,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 56, 2563–2569 (2009). [CrossRef]
  14. Integrated System Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland, ISE TCAD Rel.7.5.
  15. J. E. Farrell, F. Xiao, P. B. Catrysse, and B. A. Wandell, “A simulation tool for evaluating digital camera image quality,” Proc. SPIE 5294, 124–131 (2004). [CrossRef]
  16. P. B. Catrysse and B. A. Wandell, “Integrated color pixels in 0.18 μm complementary metal oxide semiconductor technology,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 2293–2306 (2003). [CrossRef]
  17. R. F. Lyon and P. M. Hubel, “Eyeing the camera: into the next century,” in Proceedings of IS&T/SID 10th Color Imaging Conference (The Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 2002), pp. 349–355.
  18. P. M. Hubel, “Foveon Technology and the changing landscape of digital cameras,” in Thirteenth Color Imaging Conference: Color Science and Engineering Systems, Technologies, and Applications (The Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 2005), pp. 314–317.
  19. S. Lansel, and B. Wandell, “Local linear learned image processing pipeline,” in Imaging Systems Applications, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2011), paper IMC3.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited