OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 52, Iss. 13 — May. 1, 2013
  • pp: 3031–3037

Mitigating the effect of noise in the hybrid input–output method of phase retrieval

Russell Trahan, III and David Hyland  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 52, Issue 13, pp. 3031-3037 (2013)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (424 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Here a modification to the hybrid input–output (HIO) method of phase retrieval is presented which aides in mitigating the negative effects of low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Various type of interferometers measure diffraction patterns which are used to determine the Fourier transform modulus of an objective. Interferometry often suffers from very low SNRs making phase retrieval difficult because of the sensitivity of most phase retrieval algorithms to local minima. Here we analyze the effect of noise on the HIO method. The result is used as a rationale for the proposed modification to the HIO method. The algorithm presented here introduces a filtering scheme which removes much of the Fourier modulus noise. Examples are shown and the results are compared to the HIO method with and without the proposed modification. Comparisons are also made to other methods of filtering the Fourier modulus noise.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.3020) Image processing : Image reconstruction-restoration
(100.5070) Image processing : Phase retrieval

ToC Category:
Image Processing

Original Manuscript: February 11, 2013
Revised Manuscript: March 27, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: March 27, 2013
Published: April 26, 2013

Russell Trahan and David Hyland, "Mitigating the effect of noise in the hybrid input–output method of phase retrieval," Appl. Opt. 52, 3031-3037 (2013)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. J. R. Fienup, “Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison,” Appl. Opt. 21, 2758–2769 (1982). [CrossRef]
  2. J. R. Fienup, “Reconstruction of an object from the modulus of its Fourier transform,” Opt. Lett. 3, 27–29 (1978). [CrossRef]
  3. J. R. Fienup and C. C. Wackerman, “Phase-retrieval stagnation problems and solutions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 1897–1907 (1986). [CrossRef]
  4. R. Bates, “Astronomical speckle imaging,” Phys. Rep. 90, 203–297 (1982). [CrossRef]
  5. S. Marchesini, H. He, H. N. Chapman, S. P. Hau-Riege, A. Noy, M. R. Howells, U. Weierstall, and J. Spence, “X-ray image reconstruction from a diffraction pattern alone,” Phys. Rev. B 68, 140101 (2003). [CrossRef]
  6. G. Liu, “Fourier phase retrieval algorithm with noise constraints,” Signal Process. 21, 339–347 (1990). [CrossRef]
  7. G. Liu, “Object reconstruction from noisy holograms: multiplicative noise model,” Opt. Commun. 79, 402–406 (1990). [CrossRef]
  8. R. Bates and D. Mnyama, “The status of practical Fourier phase retrieval,” Adv. Electron. Electron Phys. 67, 1–64 (1986). [CrossRef]
  9. M. Kohl, A. A. Minkevich, and T. Baumback, “Improved success rate and stability for phase retrieval by including randomized overrelaxation in the hybrid input output algorithm,” Opt. Express 20, 17093–17106 (2012). [CrossRef]
  10. R. W. Gerchberg and W. O. Saxton, “A practical algorithm for the determination of the phase from image and diffraction plane pictures,” Optik 35, 237–246 (1972).
  11. D. Dravins, S. LeBohec, H. Jensen, and P. Nunez, “Optical intensity interferometry with the Cherenkov telescope array,” Astropart. Phys. 43, 331–347 (2012). [CrossRef]
  12. R. H. Brown and R. Q. Twiss, “The question of correlation between photons in coherent light rays,” Nature 178, 1447–1448 (1956). [CrossRef]
  13. C. M. Caves, “Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer,” Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693–1708 (1981). [CrossRef]
  14. A. V. Oppenhein and R. W. Schafer, Discrete-Time Signal Processing, 3rd ed. (Prentice-Hall, 1999).
  15. S. Marchesini, “A unified evaluation of iterative projection algorithms for phase retrieval,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78011301 (2007). [CrossRef]
  16. A. Levi and H. Stark, “Image restoration by the method of generalized projections with application to restoration from magnitude,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 932–943 (1984). [CrossRef]
  17. V. Elser, “Phase retrieval by iterated projections,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 40–55 (2003).
  18. I. Kodama, M. Yamaguchi, N. Ohyama, T. Honda, K. Shinohara, A. Ito, T. Matsumura, K. Kinoshita, and K. Yada, “Image reconstruction from an in-line X-ray hologram,” Opt. Commun. 125, 36–42 (1996). [CrossRef]
  19. J. Zhao, D. Wang, F. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “Hybrid phase retrieval approach for reconstruction of in-line digital holograms without twin image,” Opt. Eng. 50, 091310 (2011). [CrossRef]
  20. J. S. Wu, U. Weierstall, and J. Spence, “Iterative phase retrieval without support,” Opt. Lett. 29, 2737–2739 (2004). [CrossRef]
  21. J. Miao, D. Sayre, and H. N. Chapman, “Phase retrieval from the magnitude of the Fourier,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 1662–1669 (1998). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited