OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 52, Iss. 18 — Jun. 20, 2013
  • pp: 4171–4178

Reliability analysis and comparison of demodulation methods for dual-beam wavelength-modulation spectroscopy water vapor detection

Cunguang Zhu, Jun Chang, Pengpeng Wang, Weijie Wang, Qiang Wang, Yongning Liu, Guangping Lv, Xiangzhi Liu, Wei Wei, Fupeng Wang, and SaSa Zhang  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 52, Issue 18, pp. 4171-4178 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.004171


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (921 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Subtraction, division, and balanced ratiometric detection (BRD) are three extensively used demodulation methods for dual-beam wavelength-modulation trace gas detection. However, reliability comparisons among these methods under changing environmental conditions were rarely researched. In this paper, the influences of ambient temperature and bend loss of fibers are analyzed in detail, and the reliabilities of the subtraction, division, and BRD methods are quantitatively compared for the first time to our knowledge. When the ambient temperature is increased by 1°C, the deviation of the division method is only 0.29%, which obviously outperforms the subtraction method (2.90%) and the BRD method (0.55%). Furthermore, a concept, “power fluctuation rejection ratio,” is introduced to compare the suppression effects of the subtraction, division, and BRD methods on the laser light source power fluctuation. The study results demonstrate that the division method provides better reliability when the ambient temperature or bending loss is varied. The validity and reliability are fully verified by the fact that the experimental results give good agreement with the theoretical simulation.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.7340) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Water
(040.5160) Detectors : Photodetectors
(060.2370) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics sensors
(140.3518) Lasers and laser optics : Lasers, frequency modulated
(280.4788) Remote sensing and sensors : Optical sensing and sensors
(280.6780) Remote sensing and sensors : Temperature

ToC Category:
Detectors

History
Original Manuscript: February 5, 2013
Revised Manuscript: May 15, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: May 20, 2013
Published: June 13, 2013

Citation
Cunguang Zhu, Jun Chang, Pengpeng Wang, Weijie Wang, Qiang Wang, Yongning Liu, Guangping Lv, Xiangzhi Liu, Wei Wei, Fupeng Wang, and SaSa Zhang, "Reliability analysis and comparison of demodulation methods for dual-beam wavelength-modulation spectroscopy water vapor detection," Appl. Opt. 52, 4171-4178 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-52-18-4171


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. W. Zhang, D. J. Webb, and G.-D. Peng, “Investigation into time response of polymer fiber Bragg grating based humidity sensors,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30, 1090–1096 (2012). [CrossRef]
  2. S. Hunsmann, K. Wunderle, S. Wagner, U. Rascher, U. Schurr, and V. Ebert, “Absolute, high resolution water transpiration rate measurements on single plant leaves via tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) at 1.37 μm,” Appl. Phys. B 92, 393–401 (2008). [CrossRef]
  3. R. T. Wainner, M. B. Frish, M. C. Laderer, M. G. Allen, and B. D. Green, “Tunable diode laser wavelength modulation spectroscopy (TDL-WMS) using a fiber-amplified source,” in IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society Annual Meeting Conference Proceedings (IEEE, 2007), pp. 1–2.
  4. Q. Wang, J. Chang, and C. Zhu, “Detection of water vapor concentration based on differential value of two adjacent absorption peaks,” Laser Phys. Lett. 9, 421–425 (2012). [CrossRef]
  5. R. Kormann, R. Konigstedt, U. Parchatka, J. Lelieveld, and H. Fischer, “QUALITAS: a mid-infrared spectrometer for sensitive trace gas measurements based on quantum cascade lasers in CW operation,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 075102 (2005). [CrossRef]
  6. D. S. Bomse, A. C. Stanton, and J. A. Silver, “Frequency modulation and wavelength modulation spectroscopies: comparison of experimental methods using a lead-salt diode laser,” Appl. Opt. 31, 718–731 (1992). [CrossRef]
  7. Y. Zhang, J. Chang, Q. Wang, S. C. Zhang, and F. J. Song, “The theoretical and experimental exploration of a novel water vapor concentration measurement scheme based on scanning spectrometry,” in Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Electronics and Optoelectronics (IEEE, 2011), pp. 315–319.
  8. S. Okamura and M. Maruyama, “Improvement on the sensitivity of electro-optical system for electric field strength measurements,” Trans. Inst. Electron. Commun. Eng. Jpn. E 65, 702 (1982).
  9. P. C. D. Hobbs, “Shot noise optical measurement at baseband with noisy lasers,” Proc. SPIE 1376, 216–221 (1990). [CrossRef]
  10. K. L. Haller and P. C. D. Hobbs, “Double beam laser absorption spectroscopy: shot noise-limited performance at baseband with a novel electronic noise canceller,” Proc. SPIE 1435, 298–309 (1991). [CrossRef]
  11. I. I. Kim, B. McArthur, and E. J. Korevaar, “Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications,” Proc. SPIE 4214, 26–37 (2001). [CrossRef]
  12. M. G. Allen, K. L. Carleton, S. J. Davis, W. J. Kessler, C. E. Otis, D. A. Palombo, and D. M. Sonenfroh, “Ultrasensitive dual-beam absorption and gain spectroscopy: applications for near-infrared and visible diode laser sensors,” Appl. Opt. 34, 3240–3248 (1995). [CrossRef]
  13. R. G. Lamont, D. C. Johnson, and K. O. Hill, “Power transfer in fused biconical-taper single-mode fiber couplers: dependence on external refractive index,” Appl. Opt. 24, 327–332 (1985). [CrossRef]
  14. A. N. Bashkatov and E. A. Genina, “Water refractive index in dependence on temperature and wavelength: a simple approximation,” Proc. SPIE 5068, 393–395 (2003). [CrossRef]
  15. Q. Jianxin and H. Feng, “Study on angle deviation for coupling loss in fiber collimator packaging,” in 6th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology (IEEE, 2005), pp. 1–4.
  16. Q. Jianxin and H. Feng, “Study on pitch deviation for coupling loss in fiber collimator packing,” in 2005 Conference on High Density Microsystem Design and Packaging and Component Failure Analysis (IEEE, 2005), pp. 1–5.
  17. Q. Wang, J. Chang, C. Zhu, and Y. Liu, “High-sensitive measurement of water vapor: shot-noise level performance via a noise canceller,” Appl. Opt. 52, 1094–1099 (2013).
  18. X. Mengchi, “Research and measurement of optical fibre macrobend loss,” Telecommun. Sci. 25, 57–62 (2009).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited