OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 52, Iss. 24 — Aug. 20, 2013
  • pp: 5925–5931

Application of the random ball test for calibrating slope-dependent errors in profilometry measurements

Yue Zhou, Young-Sik Ghim, Ali Fard, and Angela Davies  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 52, Issue 24, pp. 5925-5931 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.005925


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (387 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Optical profilometers such as scanning white light interferometers and confocal microscopes provide high-resolution measurements and are widely utilized in many fields for measuring surface topography. Slope-dependent systematic errors can be present in the measurement and can be the same order of magnitude as features on the surface to be measured. We propose a self-calibration technique, the random ball test (RBT), for calibrating slope-dependent errors of such instruments. The calibration result can be used to compensate future measurements of similar spherical geometries such as profiles of refractive microlenses. A simulation study validates the approach and shows that the RBT is effective in practical limits. We demonstrate the calibration on a 50× confocal microscope and find a surface slope-dependent bias that increases monotonically with the magnitude of the surface slope and is as large as 800nm at a surface slope of 12°. The uncertainty of the calibration is smaller than the observed measurement bias and is dominated by residual random noise. Effects such as drift and ball radius uncertainty were investigated to understand their contribution to the calibration uncertainty.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(120.0120) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology
(120.2830) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Height measurements
(120.3940) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Metrology
(120.4630) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Optical inspection
(120.6650) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Surface measurements, figure

ToC Category:
Instrumentation, Measurement, and Metrology

History
Original Manuscript: May 22, 2013
Revised Manuscript: July 19, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: July 26, 2013
Published: August 14, 2013

Citation
Yue Zhou, Young-Sik Ghim, Ali Fard, and Angela Davies, "Application of the random ball test for calibrating slope-dependent errors in profilometry measurements," Appl. Opt. 52, 5925-5931 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-52-24-5925


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. X. J. Jiang and D. J. Whitehouse, “Technological shifts in surface metrology,” CIRP Ann. 61, 815–836 (2012). [CrossRef]
  2. Olympus LEXT OLS4000 laser scanning confocal microscopy manual.
  3. F. Gao, R. K. Leach, J. Petzing, and J. M. Coupland, “Surface measurement errors using commercial scanning white light interferometers,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 19, 015303 (2008). [CrossRef]
  4. R. K. Leach, C. L. Giusca, and J. M. Coupland, “Advances in calibration methods for micro- and nanoscale surfaces,” Proc. SPIE 8430, 84300H (2012). [CrossRef]
  5. R. Mandal, K. Polodhi, J. M. Coupland, R. K. Leach, and D. Mansfield, “Applications of linear systems theory to characterize coherence scanning interferometry,” Proc. SPIE 8430, 84300T (2012). [CrossRef]
  6. P. de Groot and X. Colonna de Lega, “Interpreting interferometric height measurements using the instrument transfer function,” Zygo Corporation (2005).
  7. D. Flack, Good Practice Guide No. 42—CMM Verification (National Physical Laboratory, 2001).
  8. R. E. Parks, C. J. Evans, and L. Shao, “Calibration of interferometer transmission spheres,” poster presented at Optical Fabrication and Testing, Kona, Hawaii (1998).
  9. C. J. Evans and R. N. Kestner, “Test optic error removal,” Appl. Opt. 35, 1015–1021 (1996). [CrossRef]
  10. U. Griesmann, Q. Wang, J. Soons, and R. Carakos, “A simple ball averager for reference sphere calibration,” Proc. SPIE 5869, 58690S (2005). [CrossRef]
  11. N. Gardner and A. Davies, “Self-calibration for microrefractive lens measurements,” Opt. Eng. 45, 033603 (2006). [CrossRef]
  12. A. B. Forbs, “Robust circle and sphere fitting by least squares,” (National Physical Laboratory, 1989).
  13. P. Zhou and J. Burge, “Limits for interferometer calibration using the random ball test,” Proc. SPIE 7426, 74260U (2009). [CrossRef]
  14. Metrology Laboratory, Center for Precision Metrology, University of North Carolina, Charlotte.
  15. Y. Zhou, A. Fard, and A. Davies, “Assessment of instrument drift using a spherical artifact,” Precis. Eng. (to be published).
  16. K. Creath and J. C. Wyant, “Absolute measurement of surface roughness,” Appl. Opt. 29, 3823–3827 (1990). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited