OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 52, Iss. 33 — Nov. 20, 2013
  • pp: 8073–8081

3D pose estimation of ground rigid target based on ladar range image

Dan Lv, Jian-Feng Sun, Qi Li, and Qi Wang  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 52, Issue 33, pp. 8073-8081 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.008073


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1419 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In the target recognition of laser radar (ladar), the accurate estimation of target pose can effectively simplify the recognition process. To achieve 3D pose estimation of rigid objects on the ground and simplify the complexity of the algorithm, a novel pose estimation method is proposed in this paper. In this approach, based on the feature that most rigid objects on the ground have large planar areas which are horizontal on the top of the targets and vertical sides and combined with the 3D geometric characteristics of ladar range images, the planar normals of rigid targets were adopted as the vectors in the positive direction of the axes in the model coordinate system to estimate the 3D pose angles of targets. The simulation experiments were performed with six military vehicle models and the performance in self-occlusion, occlusion, and noise was investigated. The results show that the estimation errors are less than 2° in self-occlusion. For the tank LECRERC model, as long as the upper and side planes of the target are not completely occluded, even though the occlusion reaches 80%, the pose angles can be estimated with the estimation error less than 2.5°. Moreover, the proposed method is robust to noise and effective.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.6890) Image processing : Three-dimensional image processing
(280.5600) Remote sensing and sensors : Radar

ToC Category:
Remote Sensing and Sensors

History
Original Manuscript: August 6, 2013
Revised Manuscript: October 18, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: October 18, 2013
Published: November 15, 2013

Citation
Dan Lv, Jian-Feng Sun, Qi Li, and Qi Wang, "3D pose estimation of ground rigid target based on ladar range image," Appl. Opt. 52, 8073-8081 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-52-33-8073


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. C. S. L. Chun and F. A. Sadjadi, “Target recognition study using polarimetric laser radar,” Proc. SPIE 5426, 274–284 (2004). [CrossRef]
  2. R. D. Nieves and W. D. Reynolds, “Three-dimensional transformation for automatic target recognition using LIDAR data,” Proc. SPIE 7684, 76840Y (2010). [CrossRef]
  3. Q. Wang, L. Wang, and J. F. Sun, “Rotation-invariant target recognition in LADAR range imagery using model matching approach,” Opt. Express 18, 15349–15360 (2010). [CrossRef]
  4. Z. J. Liu, Q. Li, Z. W. Xia, and Q. Wang, “Target recognition of ladar range images using even-order Zernike moments,” Appl. Opt. 51, 7529–7536 (2012). [CrossRef]
  5. J. Neulist and W. Armbruster, “Segmentation, classification, and pose estimation of military vehicles in low resolution laser radar images,” Proc. SPIE 5791, 218–225 (2005). [CrossRef]
  6. L. F. Ramon, F. Sira, D. C. Jose, and B. Xavier, “Target detection in Ladar using robust statistics,” Proc. SPIE 5988, 59880J (2005).
  7. C. Grönwall, F. Gustafsson, and M. Millnert, “Ground target recognition using rectangle estimation,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15, 3400–3408 (2006). [CrossRef]
  8. J. W. H. Tangelder and R. C. Veltkamp, “A survey of content based 3D shape retrieval methods,” in Proceedings of Shape Modeling Application (IEEE, 2004), pp. 145–156.
  9. M. A. A. Mhamdi, D. Ziou, A. Lachkar, and S. E. A. Ouatik, “An efficient method for 3D objects retrieval based on fixed number of 2D views approach,” in Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Communications and Mobile Network (ISVC) (IEEE, 2010), pp. 1–4.
  10. J. L. Shih, C. H. Lee, and C. H. Chuang, “A 3D model retrieval approach based on the combination of PCA plane projections,” J. Info. Technol. Appl. 5, 46–56 (2011).
  11. K. Sfikas, T. Theoharis, and I. Pratikakis, “ROSy+: 3D object pose normalization based on PCA and reflective object symmetry with application in 3D object retrieval,” Int. J. Comput. Vis. 91, 262–279 (2011). [CrossRef]
  12. R. M. Haralick, H. Joo, C. N. Lee, X. Zhuang, V. G. Vaiday, and M. Baekim, “Pose estimation from corresponding point data,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 19, 1426–1446 (1989). [CrossRef]
  13. F. Aghili, M. Kuryllo, G. Okouneva, and D. McTavish, “Robust pose estimation of moving objects using laser camera data for autonomous rendezvous & docking,” in Proceedings of International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (IAPRS) (2009), pp. 253–258.
  14. A. Adán, P. Merchán, and S. Salamanca, “3D scene retrieval and recognition with depth gradient images,” Pattern Recogn. Lett. 32, 1337–1353 (2011). [CrossRef]
  15. B. Taati and M. Greenspan, “Local shape descriptor selection for object recognition in range data,” Comput. Vis. Image Understanding 115, 681–694 (2011). [CrossRef]
  16. R. B. Rusu, G. Bradski, R. Thibaux, J. Hsu, and W. Garage, “Fast 3D recognition and pose using the viewpoint feature histogram,” in Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IEEE, 2010), pp. 2155–2162.
  17. A. Aldoma and M. Vincze, “CAD-model recognition and 6DOF pose estimation using 3D cues,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (IEEE, 2011), pp. 585–592.
  18. W. E. L. Grimson, Object Recognition by Computer (MIT, 1990).
  19. R. P. Paul, Robot Manipulators Mathematics Programming and Control (MIT, 1981).
  20. H. Hoppe, T. DeRose, T. Duchamp, J. McDonald, and W. Stuetzle, “Surface reconstruction from unorganized points,” in Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (ACM, 1992), pp. 71–78.
  21. P. J. Besl and R. C. Jain, “Segmentation through variable-order surface fitting,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 10, 167–192 (1988). [CrossRef]
  22. C. Dorai and A. K. Jain, “COSMOS—a representation scheme for 3D free-form objects,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19, 1115–1130 (1997). [CrossRef]
  23. H. T. Ho and D. Gibbins, “Curvature-based approach for multi-scale feature extraction from 3D meshes and unstructured point clouds,” IET Comput. Vis. 3, 201–212 (2009).
  24. T. Wu, N. G. Lv, X. P. Lou, and P. Sun, “Automatic 3D point clouds registration method,” Proc. SPIE 7855, 785526 (2010). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited