OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 52, Iss. 33 — Nov. 20, 2013
  • pp: 8082–8088

Thermal sensitivity of DASH interferometers: the role of thermal effects during the calibration of an Echelle DASH interferometer

Kenneth D. Marr, Christoph R. Englert, John M. Harlander, and Kenneth W. Miller  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 52, Issue 33, pp. 8082-8088 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.008082


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (438 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The use of a Doppler asymmetric spatial heterodyne (DASH) interferometer with an Echelle grating provides the ability to simultaneously image the 558 and 630 nm emission lines (e.g., at grating orders of n=8 and n=7, respectively) of atomic oxygen in the thermosphere. By measuring the Doppler shifts of these lines (expected relative change in wavelength on the order of 108), we are able to determine the thermospheric winds. Because the expected wavelength changes due to the Doppler shift are so small, understanding, monitoring, and accounting for thermal effects is expected to be important. Previously, the thermal behavior of a temperature-compensated monolithic DASH interferometer was found to have a higher thermal sensitivity than predicted by a simple model [Opt. Express 18, 26430, 2010]. A follow-up study [Opt. Express 20, 9535, 2012] suggested that this is due to thermal distortion of the interferometer, which consists of materials with different coefficients of thermal expansion. In this work, we characterize the thermal drift of a nonmonolithic Echelle DASH interferometer and discuss the implications of these results on the use of only a single wavelength source during calibration. Furthermore, we perform a finite element analysis of the earlier monolithic interferometer in order to determine how distortion would affect the thermal sensitivity of that device. Incorporating that data into the model, we find good agreement between the modified model and the measured thermal sensitivities. These findings emphasize the fact that distortion needs to be considered for the design of thermally compensated, monolithic DASH interferometers.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(040.2840) Detectors : Heterodyne
(100.2650) Image processing : Fringe analysis
(120.3180) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Interferometry
(120.6810) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Thermal effects
(110.2650) Imaging systems : Fringe analysis

ToC Category:
Instrumentation, Measurement, and Metrology

History
Original Manuscript: September 11, 2013
Revised Manuscript: October 16, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: October 16, 2013
Published: November 15, 2013

Citation
Kenneth D. Marr, Christoph R. Englert, John M. Harlander, and Kenneth W. Miller, "Thermal sensitivity of DASH interferometers: the role of thermal effects during the calibration of an Echelle DASH interferometer," Appl. Opt. 52, 8082-8088 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-52-33-8082


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. Heliophysics Roadmap Team, “Heliophysics: the solar and space physics of a new era,” NASA Advisory Council (2009).
  2. J. D. Huba, S. L. Ossakow, G. Joyce, J. Krall, and S. L. England, “Three-dimensional equatorial spread F modeling: zonal neutral wind effects,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L19106 (2009). [CrossRef]
  3. P. B. Hays, V. J. Abreu, M. E. Dobbs, and D. A. Gell, “The high-resolution Doppler imager on the upper atmosphere research satellite,” J. Geophys. Res. 98, 10713–10723 (1993). [CrossRef]
  4. T. L. Killeen, Q. Wu, S. C. Solomon, D. A. Ortland, W. R. Skinner, R. J. Niciejewski, and D. A. Gell, “TIMED Doppler interferometer: overview and recent results,” J. Geophys. Res. 111, A10S01 (2006). [CrossRef]
  5. J. W. Meriwether, “Studies of thermospheric dynamics with a Fabry–Perot interferometer network: a review,” J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 68, 1576–1589 (2006). [CrossRef]
  6. P. A. Greet, M. G. Conde, P. L. Dyson, J. L. Innis, A. M. Breed, and D. J. Murphy, “Thermospheric wind field over Mawson and Davis, Antarctica; simultaneous observations by two Fabry–Perot spectrometers of 630 nm emission,” J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 61, 1025–1045 (1999). [CrossRef]
  7. G. G. Shepherd, G. Thuillier, W. A. Gault, B. H. Solheim, C. Hersom, J. M. Alunni, J. F. Brun, S. Brune, P. Charlot, L. L. Desaulniers, W. F. J. Evans, R. L. Gattinger, F. Girod, D. Harvie, R. H. Hum, D. J. W. Kendall, E. J. Llewellyn, R. P. Lowe, J. Ohrt, F. Pasternak, O. Peillet, I. Powell, Y. Rochon, W. E. Ward, R. Wiens, and J. Wimperis, “WINDII, the wind imaging interferometer on the upper atmosphere research satellite,” J. Geophys. Res. 98, 10725–10750 (1993). [CrossRef]
  8. G. G. Shepherd, R. G. Roble, C. McLandress, and W. E. Ward, “WINDII observations of the 558 nm emission in the lower thermosphere: the influence of dynamics on composition,” J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 59, 655–667 (1997). [CrossRef]
  9. C. R. Englert, D. D. Babcock, and J. M. Harlander, “Doppler asymmetric spatial heterodyne spectroscopy (DASH): concept and experimental demonstration,” Appl. Opt. 46, 7297–7307 (2007). [CrossRef]
  10. C. R. Englert, J. M. Harlander, C. M. Brown, J. J. Makela, K. D. Marr, and T. J. Immel, “The Michelson interferometer for global high-resolution thermospheric imaging (MIGHTI): wind and temperature observations from the ionospheric connection explorer (ICON),” poster session presented at AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, California, 3–7 December, 2012.
  11. T. J. Immel, http://icon.ssl.berkeley.edu/ , 2013, University of California.
  12. J. M. Harlander, R. J. Reynolds, and F. L. Roesler, “Spatial heterodyne spectroscopy for the exploration of diffuse interstellar emission lines at far-ultraviolet wavelengths,” Astrophys. J. 396, 730–740 (1992). [CrossRef]
  13. J. M. Harlander, C. R. Englert, D. D. Babcock, and F. L. Roesler, “Design and laboratory tests of a Doppler asymmetric spatial heterodyne (DASH) interferometer for upper atmospheric wind and temperature observations,” Opt. Express 18, 26430–26440 (2010). [CrossRef]
  14. C. R. Englert, J. M. Harlander, J. T. Emmert, D. D. Babcock, and F. L. Roesler, “Initial ground-based thermospheric wind measurements using Doppler asymmetric spatial heterodyne spectroscopy (DASH),” Opt. Express 18, 27416–27430 (2010). [CrossRef]
  15. C. R. Englert, J. M. Harlander, C. M. Brown, J. W. Meriwether, J. J. Makela, M. Castelaz, J. T. Emmert, D. P. Drob, and K. D. Marr, “Coincident thermospheric wind measurements using ground-based Doppler asymmetric spatial heterodyne (DASH) and Fabry–Perot instruments,” J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 86, 92–98, (2012). [CrossRef]
  16. B. H. Nachfl, GmbH. Berlin, Germany, 2012, www.b-halle.de .
  17. K. D. Marr, C. R. Englert, and J. M. Harlander, “Flat-fields in DASH interferometry,” Opt. Express 20, 9535–9544 (2012). [CrossRef]
  18. Radiant Zemax, LLC. Redmond, Washington, 2013, http://radiantzemax.com/ , Version 13.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited