OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 53, Iss. 13 — May. 1, 2014
  • pp: C64–C71

Compact camera for multispectral and conventional imaging based on patterned filters

Torbjørn Skauli, Hans Erling Torkildsen, Stephane Nicolas, Thomas Opsahl, Trym Haavardsholm, Ingebjørg Kåsen, and Atle Rognmo  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 53, Issue 13, pp. C64-C71 (2014)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.53.000C64


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (680 KB) Open Access





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A multispectral camera concept is presented. The concept is based on using a patterned filter in the focal plane, combined with scanning of the field of view. The filter layout has stripes of different bandpass filters extending orthogonally to the scan direction. The pattern of filter stripes is such that all bands are sampled multiple times, while minimizing the total duration of the sampling of a given scene point. As a consequence, the filter needs only a small part of the area of an image sensor. The remaining area can be used for conventional 2D imaging. A demonstrator camera has been built with six bands in the visible and near infrared, as well as a panchromatic 2D imaging capability. Image recording and reconstruction is demonstrated, but the quality of image reconstruction is expected to be a main challenge for systems based on this concept. An important advantage is that the camera can potentially be made very compact, and also low cost. It is shown that under assumptions that are not unreasonable, the proposed camera concept can be much smaller than a conventional imaging spectrometer. In principle, it can be smaller in volume by a factor on the order of several hundred while collecting the same amount of light per multispectral band. This makes the proposed camera concept very interesting for small airborne platforms and other applications requiring compact spectral imagers.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(040.1490) Detectors : Cameras
(120.0280) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Remote sensing and sensors
(100.4145) Image processing : Motion, hyperspectral image processing
(110.4234) Imaging systems : Multispectral and hyperspectral imaging

History
Original Manuscript: January 7, 2014
Revised Manuscript: March 25, 2014
Manuscript Accepted: March 26, 2014
Published: April 21, 2014

Citation
Torbjørn Skauli, Hans Erling Torkildsen, Stephane Nicolas, Thomas Opsahl, Trym Haavardsholm, Ingebjørg Kåsen, and Atle Rognmo, "Compact camera for multispectral and conventional imaging based on patterned filters," Appl. Opt. 53, C64-C71 (2014)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-53-13-C64


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. N. Tack, A. Lambrechts, P. Soussan, and L. Haspeslagh, “A compact high-speed and low-cost hyperspectral imager,” Proc. SPIE 8266, 82660Q (2012). [CrossRef]
  2. H. Saari, V.-V. Aallos, C. Holmlund, J. Mäkynen, B. Delauré, K. Nackaerts, and B. Michiels, “Novel hyperspectral imager for lightweight UAVs,” Proc. SPIE 7668, 766805 (2010). [CrossRef]
  3. M. Pisani and M. Zucco, “Compact imaging spectrometer combining Fourier transform spectroscopy with a Fabry–Perot interferometer,” Opt. Express 17, 8319–8331 (2009). [CrossRef]
  4. D. B. Cavanaugh, J. M. Lorenz, N. Unwin, M. Dombrowski, and P. Wilson, “VNIR hypersensor camera system,” Proc. SPIE 7457, 745700 (2009). [CrossRef]
  5. A. M. Mika, “Linear-wedge spectrometer,” Proc. SPIE 1298, 127–131 (1990). [CrossRef]
  6. P. Mouroulis, R. O. Green, and T. G. Chrien, “Design of pushbroom imaging spectrometers for optimum recovery of spectroscopic and spatial information,” Appl. Opt. 39, 2210–2220 (2000). [CrossRef]
  7. T. Skauli, “An upper-bound metric for characterizing spectral and spatial coregistration errors in spectral imaging,” Opt. Express 20, 918–933 (2012). [CrossRef]
  8. X. Sun, “Computerized component variable interference filter imaging spectrometer system method and apparatus,” U.S. patent6,211,906 (3April2001).
  9. J. Biesemans, B. Delaure, and B. Michiels, “Geometric referencing of multi-spectral data,” Patent application EP2513599 A1 (2012).
  10. T. Skauli, “Imaging unit,” Patent application NO20130382 (2013).
  11. I. Kåsen, A. Rødningsby, T. V. Haavardsholm, and T. Skauli, “Band selection for hyperspectral target-detection based on a multinormal mixture anomaly detection algorithm,” Proc. SPIE 6966, 696606 (2008). [CrossRef]
  12. W. J. Smith, Modern Optical Engineering, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, 2000), p. 208.
  13. T. Skauli, R. Ingebrigtsen, and I. Kåsen, “Effect of light level and photon noise on hyperspectral target detection performance,” Proc. SPIE 6661, 66610D (2007). [CrossRef]
  14. R. Harley and A. Zisserman, Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University, 2003).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited