OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 52, Iss. 4 — Feb. 1, 2013
  • pp: ED3–ED4
« Show journal navigation

OSA’s Review of Applied Optics

Joseph N. Mait  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 52, Issue 4, pp. ED3-ED4 (2013)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (34 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools


The sky is not falling and the state of the journal is good. These are essentially the conclusions of the committee that reviewed Applied Optics in 2012. The conclusions speak directly to the concerns stated in my December 2010 editorial “Identity Crisis.” The committee’s report is reassuringly positive, but it also provides recommendations to ensure the journal continues to fill an important and unique niche for the optics community.

The committee surveyed readers, authors, reviewers, and editors about their impressions of the journal, including the quality of the journal and their regard for it. The committee also held follow-up interviews with some of the respondents.

Indeed, the journal is held in high regard. A substantial majority of respondents (more than 75 percent) feel the quality of the journal has stayed the same or increased in the past five years. A minority of respondents felt the quality had decreased. The reasons cited for this decline were the publications were not science (I actually take this as a positive comment because Applied Optics is not a science journal but an applied one), contained poor analysis, were duplicative, or provided poor interpretation. I take these criticisms seriously. They indicate our reviews need to improve and our criteria for publishing manuscripts can be more stringent.

The report’s primary concern was the confusion that exists between manuscripts best suited for Applied Optics versus Optics Express. This issue is being addressed by OSA’s Board of Editors. Consequently, the board asked the editors of all OSA journals to look carefully at their journal definitions and to update reviewer feedback forms to ensure the form properly reflects the journal’s character. This will continue throughout the year.

The planned upgrade of OSA’s review system, ADS, should help remove some of this confusion. I have proposed that, during manuscript submission, ADS should present authors with information that helps them select the journal best suited to their manuscript. I am also working with OSA staff to develop a transfer letter that editors of other journals should send to authors pre-review when they receive an applied paper that is better suited for Applied Optics. In light of the definition process and submission process to a specific journal, the editorial staff and I will reconsider the resubmission policy we instituted two years ago.

Looking to the future, the review committee cautioned against the journal content remaining static. We need to ensure that the journal scope remains sufficiently broad to meet the needs of all applied work in optics. The journal needs to be nimble and capable of drawing in developing areas searching for a technical home. My editors and I will develop a process to identify and capture new topic areas. A primary tool we will use is special issues.

The committee also recommended that Applied Optics promote the use of supplementary data, such as video explanations and optical design files from Oslo or Code V, and that we revive a brief article format, such as “Laboratory Notes,” to encourage practitioners to share insights, methods, and tips to others without the overhead of preparing a full article.

Joseph N. Mait

February 2013

Editor in Chief, Applied Optics

OCIS Codes
(000.1200) General : Announcements, awards, news, and organizational activities
(000.5360) General : Physics literature and publications

Original Manuscript: January 4, 2013
Published: February 1, 2013

Joseph N. Mait, "OSA’s Review of Applied Optics," Appl. Opt. 52, ED3-ED4 (2013)

Sort:  Journal  |  Reset  


References are not available for this paper.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited