OSA's Digital Library

Applied Spectroscopy

Applied Spectroscopy


  • Vol. 42, Iss. 6 — Aug. 1, 1988
  • pp: 952–957

Comparison Among Several Numerical Integration Methods for Kramers-Kronig Transformation

Koji Ohta and Hatsuo Ishida

Applied Spectroscopy, Vol. 42, Issue 6, pp. 952-957 (1988)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (526 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

  • Export Citation/Save Click for help


Several numerical integration methods are compared in order to search out the most effective method for the Kramers-Kronig transformation, using the analytical formula of the Kramers-Kronig transformation of a Lorentzian function as a reference. The methods to be compared involve the use of (1) Maclaurin's formula, (2) trapezium formula, (3) Simpson's formula, and (4) successive double Fourier transform methods. It is found that Maclaurin's formula, in which no special approximation is necessary for the pole part of the integration, gives the most accurate results, and also that its computation time is short. Successive Fourier transform is less accurate than the other methods, but it takes the least time when used without zero-filling. These results have important relevance for programs used to obtain optical constant spectra and to analyze spectral data.

Koji Ohta and Hatsuo Ishida, "Comparison Among Several Numerical Integration Methods for Kramers-Kronig Transformation," Appl. Spectrosc. 42, 952-957 (1988)

Sort:  Journal  |  Reset


References are not available for this paper.

Cited By

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited