OSA's Digital Library

Applied Spectroscopy

Applied Spectroscopy

| PUBLISHED BY SAS — AVAILABLE FROM SAS AND OSA

  • Vol. 55, Iss. 6 — Jun. 1, 2001
  • pp: 767–773

Performance Comparisons of Conventional and Line-Focused Surface Raman Spectrometers

Jeremy Ramsey, Srikanth Ranganathan, Richard L. McCreery, and Jun Zhao

Applied Spectroscopy, Vol. 55, Issue 6, pp. 767-773 (2001)


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (238 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations
  • Export Citation/Save Click for help

Abstract

Four Raman spectrometer configurations were compared for obtaining spectra of surface monolayers, including a new design that employed a line rather than point focus. Each spectrometer used a 514.5 nm laser and charge-coupled device (CCD) detector, but they differed in collection efficiency and sampling optics. Previously defined figures of merit for Raman signal and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were determined for each spectrometer, to aid quantitative comparison. The figure of merit for SNR, FSNR, is demonstrated to be useful for comparisons because it permits prediction of SNR for a given spectrometer, sample, and measurement conditions. A rigorous definition of FSNR is based on power density and takes into account the laser damage threshold of the sample. A simpler but less rigorous definition is based on laser power at the sample rather than power density and may be more useful to users who rarely determine the laser spot size. A new spectrometer design employing line focusing and collection is presented, with f/2 optics and a 6 mm slit image at the CCD. A proprietary aberration correction prevents slit image curvature common to most spectrographs with low f/#, and permits full height binning of the CCD. The line-focused spectrometer yielded an SNR and FSNR which are comparable to those for a point focus using the same collection optics and slightly lower than those for the most efficient spectrograph examined. However, the line focus permitted much lower power densities to be employed, or yielded much larger signal for the same power density at a point focus. In quantitative terms, the new line-focused design yielded an SNR which is 67 times that of the best point-focused system, for the same sample, measurement time, and laser power density.

Citation
Jeremy Ramsey, Srikanth Ranganathan, Richard L. McCreery, and Jun Zhao, "Performance Comparisons of Conventional and Line-Focused Surface Raman Spectrometers," Appl. Spectrosc. 55, 767-773 (2001)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/as/abstract.cfm?URI=as-55-6-767

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited