OSA's Digital Library

Biomedical Optics Express

Biomedical Optics Express

  • Editor: Joseph A. Izatt
  • Vol. 1, Iss. 1 — Aug. 2, 2010
  • pp: 47–58

A practical method of measuring the human temporal contrast sensitivity function

Billy R. Wooten, Lisa M. Renzi, Robert Moore, and Billy R. Hammond, Jr.  »View Author Affiliations


Biomedical Optics Express, Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 47-58 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.1.000047


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1269 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

One of the more significant indicators of neural age-related loss and disease is reduced temporal processing speed. It would, therefore, be useful to have an accurate and practical device that measures the full range of an individual's temporal processing abilities (characterized as the temporal contrast sensitivity function, TCSF). 70 subjects (15-84 yrs) were tested. A small tabletop device utilizing electronic control of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) was constructed that delivered a 1-degree, 660 nm test (the modulation depth of which could be adjusted directly by the subject) centered within a 10-degree 660 nm surround. The method provided a TCSF that had a shape consistent with past studies (peaking around 8 Hz). Also consistent with past work, the largest age-decline was found at the highest frequencies and for the central fovea (r = 0.47, p<0.0001, ~2 Hz per decade). Psychophysical assessment of temporal vision offers an easy and dynamic measure of central visual function.

© 2010 OSA

OCIS Codes
(120.0120) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology
(220.0220) Optical design and fabrication : Optical design and fabrication
(230.0230) Optical devices : Optical devices
(330.0330) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision, color, and visual optics

ToC Category:
Neuroscience and Brain Imaging

History
Original Manuscript: April 26, 2010
Revised Manuscript: June 22, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: June 25, 2010
Published: July 14, 2010

Virtual Issues
Bio-Optics in Clinical Application, Nanotechnology, and Drug Discovery (2010) Biomedical Optics Express

Citation
Billy R. Wooten, Lisa M. Renzi, Robert Moore, and Billy R. Hammond, "A practical method of measuring the human temporal contrast sensitivity function," Biomed. Opt. Express 1, 47-58 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/boe/abstract.cfm?URI=boe-1-1-47


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A number of terms have been used to describe human temporal sensitivity. An early, and still relatively common, usage was the temporal modulation transfer function. Such a term, however, refers to physical characteristics of the stimulus not to the psychophysical response. Even with respect to the latter, the “modulation transfer function” is more aptly used to refer to the ability of a lens or optical system to faithfully transmit an image (in terms of its contrast, etc). “Contrast sensitivity” is the most descriptive term because it directly describes the actual values one obtains. Of course, contrast can be varied in either the spatial or temporal domains so this must also be specified (to wit, the SCSF or the TCSF).
  2. H. de Lange, “Experiments on flicker and some calculations on an electrical analogue of the foveal systems,” Physica 18(11), 935–950 (1952). [CrossRef]
  3. A. B. Watson, “Temporal sensitivity,” in Handbook of perception and human performance, K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas, eds. (Wiley, New York, NY, 1986).
  4. D. H. Kelly, “Spatio-temporal frequency chracteristics of color-vision mechanisms,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64(7), 983–990 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. M. J. Mayer, C. B. Y. Kim, A. Svingos, and A. Glucs, “Foveal flicker sensitivity in healthy aging eyes. I. Compensating for pupil variation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5(12), 2201–2209 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. C. W. Tyler, “Two processes control variations in flicker sensitivity over the life span,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6(4), 481–490 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. W. H. Seiple, V. Greenstein, and R. Carr, “Losses of temporal modulation sensitivity in retinal degenerations,” Br. J. Ophthalmol. 73(6), 440–447 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. M. J. Mayer, S. J. Spiegler, B. Ward, A. Glucs, and C. B. Kim, “Foveal flicker sensitivity discriminates ARM-risk from healthy eyes,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 33(11), 3143–3149 (1992). [PubMed]
  9. M. J. Mayer, S. J. Spiegler, B. Ward, A. Glucs, and C. B. Kim, “Preliminary evaluation of flicker sensitivity as a predictive test for exudative age-related maculopathy,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 33(11), 3150–3155 (1992). [PubMed]
  10. U. T. Keesey, “Variables determining flicker sensitivity in small fields,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60(3), 390–398 (1970). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. A. Peters, “Structural changes that occur during normal aging of primate cerebral hemispheres,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26(7), 733–741 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. C. W. Tyler, “Specific deficits of flicker sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 20(2), 204–212 (1981). [PubMed]
  13. K. Neelam, J. Nolan, U. Chakravarthy, and S. Beatty, “Psychophysical function in age-related maculopathy,” Surv. Ophthalmol. 54(2), 167–210 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. M. J. Mayer, B. Ward, R. Klein, J. B. Talcott, R. F. Dougherty, and A. Glucs, “Flicker sensitivity and fundus appearance in pre-exudative age-related maculopathy,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 35(3), 1138–1149 (1994). [PubMed]
  15. J. A. Phipps, T. M. Dang, A. J. Vingrys, and R. H. Guymer, “Flicker perimetry losses in age-related macular degeneration,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45(9), 3355–3360 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. C. W. Tyler, “Analysis of normal flicker sensitivity and its variability in the visuogram test,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 32(9), 2552–2560 (1991). [PubMed]
  17. R. Granit and P. Harper, “Comparative studies on the peripheral and central retina: II.Synaptic reaction in the eye,” Am. J. Physiol. 95, 211–228 (1930).
  18. E. S. Ferry, “Persistence of vision,” Am. J. Sci. 44, 192–207 (1892).
  19. T. C. Porter, “Contributions to the study of flicker, II,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 70A, 31–329 (1902).
  20. C. W. Tyler and R. D. Hamer, “Analysis of visual modulation sensitivity. IV. Validity of the Ferry-Porter law,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7(4), 743–758 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. M. A. García-Pérez and E. Peli, “Luminance artifacts of cathode-ray tube displays for vision research,” Spat. Vis. 14(2), 201–215 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. A. J. Zele and A. J. Vingrys, “Cathode-ray-tube monitor artefacts in neurophysiology,” J. Neurosci. Methods 141(1), 1–7 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. M. Bach, T. Meigen, and H. Strasburger, “Raster-scan cathode-ray tubes for vision research--limits of resolution in space, time and intensity, and some solutions,” Spat. Vis. 10(4), 403–414 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. A. B. Metha, A. J. Vingrys, and D. R. Badcock, “Calibration of a color monitor for visual psychophysics,” Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 25, 371–383 (1993).
  25. C. W. Tyler, “Analysis of visual modulation sensitivity. II. Peripheral retina and the role of photoreceptor dimensions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2(3), 393–398 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. B. R. Hammond and B. R. Wooten, “CFF thresholds: relation to macular pigment optical density,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 25(4), 315–319 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. B. Winn, D. Whitaker, D. B. Elliott, and N. J. Phillips, “Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 35(3), 1132–1137 (1994). [PubMed]
  28. The results for our age analysis were limited by the fact that we did not sample equally across ages (there are more young subjects) and six of our oldest subjects could not detect flicker at the highest frequency even at maximum contrast (hence, the age-reduction may be greater for the highest frequencies). It should also be noted that we used a different field size in the two locations which also could have contributed to the differences in age-loss we report.
  29. D. H. Kelly, “Visual responses to time-dependent stimuli. I. Amplitude sensitivity measurements,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 51(4), 422–429 (1961). [CrossRef]
  30. J. M. Rovamo and A. Raninen, “Critical flicker frequency and M-scaling of stimulus size and retinal illuminance,” Vision Res. 24(10), 1127–1131 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. J. R. Jarvis, N. B. Prescott, and C. M. Wathes, “A mechanistic inter-species comparison of flicker sensitivity,” Vision Res. 43(16), 1723–1734 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. P. J. B. Barten, Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its effects on image quality. (SPIE Optical Engineering Press, Washington, 1999).
  33. J. M. Rovamo, A. Raninen, and K. Donner, “The effects of temporal noise and retinal illuminance on foveal flicker sensitivity,” Vision Res. 39(3), 533–550 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. J. A. Joseph, B. Shukitt-Hale, N. A. Denisova, D. Bielinski, A. Martin, J. J. McEwen, and P. C. Bickford, “Reversals of age-related declines in neuronal signal transduction, cognitive, and motor behavioral deficits with blueberry, spinach, or strawberry dietary supplementation,” J. Neurosci. 19(18), 8114–8121 (1999). [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited