OSA's Digital Library

Biomedical Optics Express

Biomedical Optics Express

  • Editor: Joseph A. Izatt
  • Vol. 1, Iss. 2 — Sep. 1, 2010
  • pp: 463–470

Polarization response measurement and simulation of rigid endoscopes

Tobias C. Wood and Daniel S. Elson  »View Author Affiliations


Biomedical Optics Express, Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 463-470 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.1.000463


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (3055 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Polarized light can reveal diagnostic information about tissue morphology. To promote easy adoption of polarization imaging techniques in the clinic it would be beneficial if they can be used with standard medical imaging instruments such as rigid endoscopes. We have characterized the polarization properties of two commercial laparoscopes and observed birefringence effects that complicate polarization imaging. Possible solutions are discussed that may be of interest to other tissue polarization imaging researchers.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(170.0110) Medical optics and biotechnology : Imaging systems
(170.2150) Medical optics and biotechnology : Endoscopic imaging

ToC Category:
Endoscopes, Catheters and Micro-Optics

History
Original Manuscript: June 1, 2010
Revised Manuscript: July 20, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: July 21, 2010
Published: August 3, 2010

Virtual Issues
Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy (2010) Biomedical Optics Express

Citation
Tobias C. Wood and Daniel S. Elson, "Polarization response measurement and simulation of rigid endoscopes," Biomed. Opt. Express 1, 463-470 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/boe/abstract.cfm?URI=boe-1-2-463


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. Anderson, “Polarized light examination and photography of the skin,” Arch. Dermatol. 127, 1000–1005 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. C. Sun, L. Lu, C. Yang, Y. Kiang, and M. Su, “Myocardial tissue characterization based on the time-resolved Stokes-Mueller formalism,” Opt. Express 10, 1347–1353 (2002). [PubMed]
  3. J. Baba, J. Chung, A. DeLaughter, B. Cameron, and G. Cote, “Development and calibration of an automated Mueller matrix polarization imaging system,” J. Biomed. Opt. 7, 341–349 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. M. K. Swami, S. Manhas, P. Buddhiwant, N. Ghosh, A. Uppal, and P. K. Gupta, “Polar decomposition of 3 × 3 Mueller matrix: a tool for quantitative tissue polarimetry,” Opt. Express 14, 9324–9337 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. M. Wood, N. Ghosh, E. Moriyama, B. Wilson, and I. Vitkin, “Proof-of-principle demonstration of a Mueller matrix decomposition method for polarized light tissue characterization in vivo,” J. Biomed. Opt. 14, 014029 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. V. Backman, R. Gurjar, K. Badizadegan, I. Itzkan, R. Dasari, L. Perelman, and M. Feld, “Polarized light scattering spectroscopy for quantitative measurement of epithelial cellular structures in situ,” IEEE J Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 5, 1019–1026 (1999). [CrossRef]
  7. R. Gurjar, V. Backman, L. Perelman, I. Georgakoudi, K. Badizadegan, I. Itzkan, R. Dasari, and M. Feld, “Imaging human epithelial properties with polarized light-scattering spectroscopy,” Nat. Med. 7, 1245–1248 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. W. S. Bickel and W. M. Bailey, “Stokes vectors, Mueller matrices, and polarized scattered light,” Am. J. Phys. 53, 468–478 (1985). [CrossRef]
  9. R. Anderson, “Measurement of Mueller matrices,” Appl. Opt. 31, 11–13 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. T. Wood, S. Thiemjarus, K. Koh, D. Elson, and G. Yang, “Optimal feature selection applied to multispectral fluorescence imaging,” Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention MICCAI 2008 2, 222–229 (2008).
  11. S. Lu and R. Chipman, “Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 1106–1113 (1996). [CrossRef]
  12. E. A. Oberemok and S. N. Savenkov, “Structure of deterministic Mueller matrices and their reconstruction in the method of three input polarizations,” J. Appl. Spectrosc. 70, 224–229 (2003). [CrossRef]
  13. J. Morio and F. Goudail, “Influence of the order of diattenuator, retarder, and polarizer in polar decomposition of Mueller matrices,” Opt. Lett. 29, 2234–2236 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. P. Shukla and A. Pradhan, “Mueller decomposition images for cervical tissue: potential for discriminating normal and dysplastic states,” Opt. Express 17, 1600–1609 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. N. Ghosh, M. Wood, S. H. Li, R. Weisel, B. Wilson, R. Li, and I. Vitkin, “Mueller matrix decomposition for polarized light assessment of biological tissues,” J. Biophoton. 2, 145–156 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. T. C. Wood and D. S. Elson, “Polarization characterisation of laparoscope systems for polarization resolved tissue imaging,” in “Biomedical Optics,” (Optical Society of America, 2010), p. BTuD29.
  17. A. MacGregor, “Method for computing homogeneous liquid-crystal conoscopic figures,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 7, 337–347 (1990). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited