OSA's Digital Library

Biomedical Optics Express

Biomedical Optics Express

  • Editor: Joseph A. Izatt
  • Vol. 4, Iss. 11 — Nov. 1, 2013
  • pp: 2585–2595

Variational analysis of the mouse and rat eye optical parameters

Gurinder Bawa, Tatiana V. Tkatchenko, Ivan Avrutsky, and Andrei V. Tkatchenko  »View Author Affiliations


Biomedical Optics Express, Vol. 4, Issue 11, pp. 2585-2595 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.4.002585


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1067 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Rodent models are increasingly used to study refractive eye development and development of refractive errors; however, there is still some uncertainty regarding the accuracy of the optical models of the rat and mouse eye primarily due to high variability in reported ocular parameters. In this work, we have systematically evaluated the contribution of various ocular parameters, such as radii of curvature of ocular surfaces, thicknesses of ocular components, and refractive indices of ocular refractive media, using variational analysis and a computational model of the rodent eye. Variational analysis revealed that not all variation in ocular parameters has critical impact on the refractive status of the eye. Variation in the depth of the vitreous chamber, thickness of the lens, radius of the anterior surface of the cornea, radius of the anterior surface of the lens, as well as refractive indices for the lens and vitreous, appears to have the largest impact on the refractive error. The radii of the posterior surfaces of the cornea and lens have much smaller contributions to the refractive state. These data provide the framework for further refinement of the optical models of the rat and mouse eye and suggest that extra efforts should be directed towards increasing the linear resolution of the rodent eye biometry and obtaining more accurate data for the refractive indices of the lens and vitreous.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(000.1430) General : Biology and medicine
(080.0080) Geometric optics : Geometric optics
(170.0170) Medical optics and biotechnology : Medical optics and biotechnology
(170.3660) Medical optics and biotechnology : Light propagation in tissues
(170.4460) Medical optics and biotechnology : Ophthalmic optics and devices
(170.4470) Medical optics and biotechnology : Ophthalmology
(330.0330) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision, color, and visual optics
(080.1753) Geometric optics : Computation methods
(330.7326) Vision, color, and visual optics : Visual optics, modeling

ToC Category:
Ophthalmology Applications

History
Original Manuscript: July 8, 2013
Revised Manuscript: October 14, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: October 15, 2013
Published: October 23, 2013

Citation
Gurinder Bawa, Tatiana V. Tkatchenko, Ivan Avrutsky, and Andrei V. Tkatchenko, "Variational analysis of the mouse and rat eye optical parameters," Biomed. Opt. Express 4, 2585-2595 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/boe/abstract.cfm?URI=boe-4-11-2585


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. A. Hughes, “A schematic eye for the rat,” Vision Res.19(5), 569–588 (1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. M. C. Campbell and A. Hughes, “An analytic, gradient index schematic lens and eye for the rat which predicts aberrations for finite pupils,” Vision Res.21(7), 1129–1148 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. A. Chaudhuri, P. E. Hallett, and J. A. Parker, “Aspheric curvatures, refractive indices and chromatic aberration for the rat eye,” Vision Res.23(12), 1351–1363 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. S. Remtulla and P. E. Hallett, “A schematic eye for the mouse, and comparisons with the rat,” Vision Res.25(1), 21–31 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. C. Schmucker and F. Schaeffel, “A paraxial schematic eye model for the growing C57BL/6 mouse,” Vision Res.44(16), 1857–1867 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. X. Zhou, P. Bedggood, and A. Metha, “Limitations to adaptive optics image quality in rodent eyes,” Biomed. Opt. Express3(8), 1811–1824 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. E. G. de la Cera, G. Rodríguez, L. Llorente, F. Schaeffel, and S. Marcos, “Optical aberrations in the mouse eye,” Vision Res.46(16), 2546–2553 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Y. Geng, L. A. Schery, R. Sharma, A. Dubra, K. Ahmad, R. T. Libby, and D. R. Williams, “Optical properties of the mouse eye,” Biomed. Opt. Express2(4), 717–738 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. G. Zhou and R. W. Williams, “Mouse models for the analysis of myopia: an analysis of variation in eye size of adult mice,” Optom. Vis. Sci.76(6), 408–418 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. A. V. Tkatchenko, Y. Shen, and T. V. Tkatchenko, “Genetic background modulates refractive eye development and susceptibility to myopia in the mouse,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53, E-Abstract 3465 (2012).
  11. M. T. Pardue, R. A. Stone, and P. M. Iuvone, “Investigating mechanisms of myopia in mice,” Exp. Eye Res.114, 96–105 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. X. Zhou, M. Shen, J. Xie, J. Wang, L. Jiang, M. Pan, J. Qu, and F. Lu, “The development of the refractive status and ocular growth in C57BL/6 mice,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.49(12), 5208–5214 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. X. Zhou, J. An, X. Wu, R. Lu, Q. Huang, R. Xie, L. Jiang, and J. Qu, “Relative axial myopia induced by prolonged light exposure in C57BL/6 mice,” Photochem. Photobiol.86(1), 131–137 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. X. Zhou, Q. Huang, J. An, R. Lu, X. Qin, L. Jiang, Y. Li, J. Wang, J. Chen, and J. Qu, “Genetic deletion of the adenosine A2A receptor confers postnatal development of relative myopia in mice,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.51(9), 4362–4370 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Y. Yu, H. Chen, J. Tuo, and Y. Zhu, “Effects of flickering light on refraction and changes in eye axial length of C57BL/6 mice,” Ophthalmic Res.46(2), 80–87 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. T. V. Tkatchenko, Y. Shen, and A. V. Tkatchenko, “Analysis of postnatal eye development in the mouse with high-resolution small animal magnetic resonance imaging,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.51(1), 21–27 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. T. V. Tkatchenko, Y. Shen, and A. V. Tkatchenko, “Mouse experimental myopia has features of primate myopia,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.51(3), 1297–1303 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. T. V. Tkatchenko and A. V. Tkatchenko, “Ketamine-xylazine anesthesia causes hyperopic refractive shift in mice,” J. Neurosci. Methods193(1), 67–71 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. C. Schmucker and F. Schaeffel, “Contrast sensitivity of wildtype mice wearing diffusers or spectacle lenses, and the effect of atropine,” Vision Res.46(5), 678–687 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. F. Schaeffel, E. Burkhardt, H. C. Howland, and R. W. Williams, “Measurement of refractive state and deprivation myopia in two strains of mice,” Optom. Vis. Sci.81(2), 99–110 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. M. T. Pardue, A. E. Faulkner, A. Fernandes, H. Yin, F. Schaeffel, R. W. Williams, N. Pozdeyev, and P. M. Iuvone, “High susceptibility to experimental myopia in a mouse model with a retinal on pathway defect,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.49(2), 706–712 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. J. Wisard, A. Faulkner, M. A. Chrenek, T. Waxweiler, W. Waxweiler, C. Donmoyer, G. I. Liou, C. M. Craft, G. F. Schmid, J. H. Boatright, M. T. Pardue, and J. M. Nickerson, “Exaggerated eye growth in IRBP-deficient mice in early development,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.52(8), 5804–5811 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. J. Alda and J. Arasa, “Paraxial ray tracing,” in Encyclopedia of optical engineering (Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 2004).
  24. R. J. Schechter, “Snell’s Law: optimum pathway analysis,” Surv. Ophthalmol.21(6), 464–466 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. J. E. Greivenkamp, Field guide to geometrical optics (SPIE Press, Bellingham, Wash., 2004).
  26. T. V. Tkatchenko, Y. Shen, R. D. Braun, G. Bawa, P. Kumar, I. Avrutsky, and A. V. Tkatchenko, “Photopic visual input is necessary for emmetropization in mice,” Exp. Eye Res.115, 87–95 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. F. Schaeffel and H. C. Howland, “Mathematical model of emmetropization in the chicken,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A5(12), 2080–2086 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited