OSA's Digital Library

Biomedical Optics Express

Biomedical Optics Express

  • Editor: Joseph A. Izatt
  • Vol. 4, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 2013
  • pp: 1318–1331

Influence of sampling window size and orientation on parafoveal cone packing density

Marco Lombardo, Sebastiano Serrao, Pietro Ducoli, and Giuseppe Lombardo  »View Author Affiliations


Biomedical Optics Express, Vol. 4, Issue 8, pp. 1318-1331 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.4.001318


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1755 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We assessed the agreement between sampling windows of different size and orientation on packing density estimates in images of the parafoveal cone mosaic acquired using a flood-illumination adaptive optics retinal camera. Horizontal and vertical oriented sampling windows of different size (320x160 µm, 160x80 µm and 80x40 µm) were selected in two retinal locations along the horizontal meridian in one eye of ten subjects. At each location, cone density tended to decline with decreasing sampling area. Although the differences in cone density estimates were not statistically significant, Bland-Altman plots showed that the agreement between cone density estimated within the different sampling window conditions was moderate. The percentage of the preferred packing arrangements of cones by Voronoi tiles was slightly affected by window size and orientation. The results illustrated the high importance of specifying the size and orientation of the sampling window used to derive cone metric estimates to facilitate comparison of different studies.

© 2013 OSA

OCIS Codes
(170.1610) Medical optics and biotechnology : Clinical applications
(110.3925) Imaging systems : Metrics
(110.1080) Imaging systems : Active or adaptive optics

ToC Category:
Active and Adaptive Optics

History
Original Manuscript: March 7, 2013
Revised Manuscript: June 12, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: June 12, 2013
Published: July 12, 2013

Citation
Marco Lombardo, Sebastiano Serrao, Pietro Ducoli, and Giuseppe Lombardo, "Influence of sampling window size and orientation on parafoveal cone packing density," Biomed. Opt. Express 4, 1318-1331 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/boe/abstract.cfm?URI=boe-4-8-1318


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. P. Godara, A. M. Dubis, A. Roorda, J. L. Duncan, and J. Carroll, “Adaptive optics retinal imaging: emerging clinical applications,” Optom. Vis. Sci.87(12), 930–941 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. G. Huang, X. Qi, T. Y. Chui, Z. Zhong, and S. A. Burns, “A clinical planning module for adaptive optics SLO imaging,” Optom. Vis. Sci.89(5), 593–601 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. M. Lombardo, S. Serrao, N. Devaney, M. Parravano, and G. Lombardo, “Adaptive optics technology for high-resolution retinal imaging,” Sensors (Basel)13(1), 334–366 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. A. Dubra, Y. Sulai, J. L. Norris, R. F. Cooper, A. M. Dubis, D. R. Williams, and J. Carroll, “Noninvasive imaging of the human rod photoreceptor mosaic using a confocal adaptive optics scanning ophthalmoscope,” Biomed. Opt. Express2(7), 1864–1876 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. M. Lombardo, G. Lombardo, P. Ducoli, and S. Serrao, “Adaptive optics photoreceptor imaging,” Ophthalmology119(7), 1498, e2 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. K. Y. Li and A. Roorda, “Automated identification of cone photoreceptors in adaptive optics retinal images,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A24(5), 1358–1363 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. B. Xue, S. S. Choi, N. Doble, and J. S. Werner, “Photoreceptor counting and montaging of en-face retinal images from an adaptive optics fundus camera,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A24(5), 1364–1372 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. H. Song, T. Y. P. Chui, Z. Zhong, A. E. Elsner, and S. A. Burns, “Variation of cone photoreceptor packing density with retinal eccentricity and age,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.52(10), 7376–7384 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. K. Y. Li, P. Tiruveedhula, and A. Roorda, “Intersubject variability of foveal cone photoreceptor density in relation to eye length,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.51(12), 6858–6867 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. T. Y. P. Chui, H. Song, and S. A. Burns, “Adaptive-optics imaging of human cone photoreceptor distribution,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A25(12), 3021–3029 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. M. Lombardo, S. Serrao, P. Ducoli, and G. Lombardo, “Variations in image optical quality of the eye and the sampling limit of resolution of the cone mosaic with axial length in young adults,” J. Cataract Refract. Surg.38(7), 1147–1155 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. T. Y. P. Chui, H. Song, and S. A. Burns, “Individual variations in human cone photoreceptor packing density: variations with refractive error,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.49(10), 4679–4687 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. D. Merino, J. L. Duncan, P. Tiruveedhula, and A. Roorda, “Observation of cone and rod photoreceptors in normal subjects and patients using a new generation adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope,” Biomed. Opt. Express2(8), 2189–2201 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. E. W. Dees, A. Dubra, and R. C. Baraas, “Variability in parafoveal cone mosaic in normal trichromatic individuals,” Biomed. Opt. Express2(5), 1351–1358 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. M. Lombardo, G. Lombardo, D. S. Lomoriello, P. Ducoli, M. Stirpe, and S. Serrao, “Interocular symmetry of parafoveal photoreceptor cone density distribution,” Retina E-published (2013). [CrossRef]
  16. R. Garrioch, C. Langlo, A. M. Dubis, R. F. Cooper, A. Dubra, and J. Carroll, “Repeatability of in vivo parafoveal cone density and spacing measurements,” Optom. Vis. Sci.89(5), 632–643 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. K. E. Talcott, K. Ratnam, S. M. Sundquist, A. S. Lucero, B. J. Lujan, W. Tao, T. C. Porco, A. Roorda, and J. L. Duncan, “Longitudinal study of cone photoreceptors during retinal degeneration and in response to ciliary neurotrophic factor treatment,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.52(5), 2219–2226 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. M. Lombardo, S. Serrao, P. Ducoli, and G. Lombardo, “Eccentricity dependent changes of density, spacing and packing arrangement of parafoveal cones,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. E-published (2013). [CrossRef]
  19. P. Godara, C. Siebe, J. Rha, M. Michaelides, and J. Carroll, “Assessing the photoreceptor mosaic over drusen using adaptive optics and SD-OCT,” Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging41(6Suppl), S104–S108 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. P. Godara, M. Wagner-Schuman, J. Rha, T. B. Connor, K. E. Stepien, and J. Carroll, “Imaging the photoreceptor mosaic with adaptive optics: beyond counting cones,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.723, 451–458 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. S. Ooto, M. Hangai, K. Takayama, A. Sakamoto, A. Tsujikawa, S. Oshima, T. Inoue, and N. Yoshimura, “High-resolution imaging of the photoreceptor layer in epiretinal membrane using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy,” Ophthalmology118(5), 873–881 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. A. Boretsky, F. Khan, G. Burnett, D. X. Hammer, R. D. Ferguson, F. van Kuijk, and M. Motamedi, “In vivo imaging of photoreceptor disruption associated with age-related macular degeneration: a pilot study,” Lasers Surg. Med.44(8), 603–610 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. J. Hirsch and W. H. Miller, “Does cone positional disorder limit resolution?” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A4(8), 1481–1492 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. C. A. Curcio and K. R. Sloan, “Packing geometry of human cone photoreceptors: variation with eccentricity and evidence for local anisotropy,” Vis. Neurosci.9(02), 169–180 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. C. A. Curcio, K. R. Sloan, R. E. Kalina, and A. E. Hendrickson, “Human photoreceptor topography,” J. Comp. Neurol.292(4), 497–523 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. C. A. Curcio and K. R. Sloan, “Packing geometry of human cone photoreceptors: variation with eccentricity and evidence for local anisotropy,” Vis. Neurosci.9(02), 169–180 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lda. F. Costa, D. M. Bonci, C. A. Saito, F. A. Rocha, L. C. Silveira, and D. F. Ventura, “Voronoi analysis uncovers relationship between mosaics of normally placed and displaced amacrine cells in the thraira retina,” Neuroinformatics5(1), 59–78 (2007). [PubMed]
  28. M. B. Shapiro, S. J. Schein, and F. M. De Monasterio, “Regularity and structure of the spatial pattern of blue cones of macaque retina,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc.80(392), 803–812 (1985). [CrossRef]
  29. Y. A. Kram, S. Mantey, and J. C. Corbo, “Avian cone photoreceptors tile the retina as five independent, self-organizing mosaics,” PLoS ONE5(2), e8992 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. N. Drasdo and C. W. Fowler, “Non-linear projection of the retinal image in a wide-angle schematic eye,” Br. J. Ophthalmol.58(8), 709–714 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. N. J. Coletta and T. Watson, “Effect of myopia on visual acuity measured with laser interference fringes,” Vision Res.46(5), 636–651 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. W. Brostow, J. P. Dussault, and B. L. Fox, “Construction of Voronoi polyhedra,” J. Comput. Phys.29(1), 81–92 (1978). [CrossRef]
  33. R. W. Rodieck, “The density recovery profile: a method for the analysis of points in the plane applicable to retinal studies,” Vis. Neurosci.6(02), 95–111 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement,” Lancet327(8476), 307–310 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Measuring agreement in method comparison studies,” Stat. Methods Med. Res.8(2), 135–160 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. L. da Fontoura Costa, F. Rocha, and S. M. Araújo de Lima, “Characterizing polygonality in biological structures,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys.73(1), 011913 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. J. E. Cook, “Spatial properties of retinal mosaics: an empirical evaluation of some existing measures,” Vis. Neurosci.13(01), 15–30 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. D. H. Wojtas, B. Wu, P. K. Ahnelt, P. J. Bones, and R. P. Millane, “Automated analysis of differential interference contrast microscopy images of the foveal cone mosaic,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A25(5), 1181–1189 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. D. Pum, P. K. Ahnelt, and M. Grasl, “Iso-orientation areas in the foveal cone mosaic,” Vis. Neurosci.5(06), 511–523 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited