OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Display Technology

Journal of Display Technology


  • Editor: Shin-Tson Wu
  • Vol. 1, Iss. 2 — Dec. 1, 2005
  • pp: 328–

Repeated Vergence Adaptation Causes the Decline of Visual Functions in Watching Stereoscopic Television

Masaki Emoto, Takahiro Niida, and Fumio Okano

Journal of Display Technology, Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 328- (2005)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1185 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

  • Export Citation/Save Click for help


To evaluate visual fatigue when viewing stereoscopic TV, a technology expected to become the broadcasting display system of the future. Wide public acceptance of stereoscopic TV awaits resolution of many issues, including visual fatigue on viewing TV images. Visual fatigue was induced using a visual function simulator, consisting of prism and lens optical systems, while viewing stereoscopic TV. We assessed subject visual fatigue through subjective reports of symptoms and by the changes in visual functions. These functions included: viewer B [Js fusional break point, recovery point, accommodation step response, and visual evoked cortical potentials (VECP)]. Significant changes of some visual functions were found after watching simulated stereoscopic TV when the vergence load was heavy or when it changed over time; relative vergence limits decreased and the latency of VECP increased after watching, reflecting visual fatigue. After subjects rested, relative vergence limits recovered to pre-viewing levels. Our findings lead us to conclude that, aside from excessive horizontal binocular parallax, discontinuous changes in parallax is also a major factor that contributes to visual fatigue in the viewing of stereoscopic images. It also causes a decreased range of relative vergence, accommodation response, and a delay in the P100 latency of VECP.

© 2005 IEEE

ToC Category:
Research Papers

Masaki Emoto, Takahiro Niida, and Fumio Okano, "Repeated Vergence Adaptation Causes the Decline of Visual Functions in Watching Stereoscopic Television," J. Display Technol. 1, 328- (2005)

Sort:  Journal  |  Reset


  1. M. Oshima, The Study of Fatigue, 2nd ed. Dobunsyoin, Tokyo 1979, pp. 4 -8.
  2. M. J. Smith, et al. "An investigation of health complaints and job stress in video display operators", Human Factors, vol. 23, pp. 387-400, 1981.
  3. P. Basehera and E. Grandjean, "Effects of repetitive tasks with different degree of difficulty on critical fusion (CFF) and subjective state", Ergonomics, vol. 22, pp. 377-385, 1979.
  4. M. C. Hogan, E. Ingham and S. S. Kurdak, "Contraction duration affects metabolic energy cost and fatigue in skeletal muscle", Amer. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. , vol. 274, no. 3, pp. E397-E402, 1998.
  5. C. A. Cohen, G. Zagelbaum, D. Gross, C. Roussos and P. T. Macklem, "Clinical manifestations of inspiratory muscle fatigue", Amer. J. Med., vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 308 -316, 1982.
  6. T. Christensen, T. Bendix and H. Kehlet, "Fatigue and cardiorespiratory function following abdominal surgery", Brit. J. Surg., vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 417-419, 1982.
  7. P. V. Simonov and M. V. Frolov, "Blink reflex as a parameter of human operator's functional state", Aviat. Space Environ. Med., vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 783-785, 1985.
  8. S. Ishikawa, "Examination of the near triad in VDU operators", Ergonomics , vol. 33, pp. 787-796, 1990.
  9. G. L. Freeman, "The relationship between performance level and bodily activity level", J. Experim. Psychol., vol. 26, pp. 602-608, 1940.
  10. D. A. Owens and K. Wolf-Kelly, "Near work, visual fatigue and variations of oculomotor tonus", Investigative Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., vol. 28, pp. 743-749, 1987.
  11. W. Jaschinski, "The Proximity-fixation-disparity curve and the preferred viewing distance at a visual display as an indicator of near vision fatigue", Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 158-169, 2002.
  12. T. Mitsuhashi, "Evaluation of stereoscopic picture quality with CFF", Ergonomics, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1344-1356, 1996.
  13. K. Murata, S. Araki, K. Yokoyama, K. Yamashita, T. Okumatsu and S. Sakou, "Accumulation of VDT work-related visual fatigue assessed by visual evoked potential, near point distance and critical flicker fusion", Ind. Health, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 61-69, 1996.
  14. W. Jaschinski-Krusa, "Transient myopia after visual work", Ergonomics, vol. 27, pp. 1181-1184, 1984.
  15. R. G. Pigion and R. J. Miller, "Fatigue of accommodation: change in accommodation after visual work", Amer. J. Optom. Physio.l Opt., vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 853-863, 1985.
  16. W. Jaschinski-Krusa, "Visual strain during VDU work: The effect of viewing distance and dark focus", Ergonomics, vol. 31, pp. 1449-1465, 1988.
  17. P. A. Howarth and P. J. Costello, "The occurrence of virtual simulation sickness symptoms when an HMD was used as a personal viewing system", Displays, vol. 18, pp. 107-116, 1997.
  18. K. Ukai, K. Tsuchida and S. Ishikawa, "Induced pupillary hippus following near vision: increased occurrence in visual display unit workers", Ergonomics , vol. 40, pp. 1201-1211, 1997.
  19. L. S. Gray, B. Gilmartin and B. Winn, "Accommodation microfluctuations and pupil size during sustained viewing of visual display terminals", Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 5-10, 2000.
  20. K. Kaneko and K. Sakamoto, "Spontaneous blinks as a criterion of visual fatigue during prolonged work on visual display terminals", Percept. Mot. Skills, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 234-250, 2001.
  21. S. Milosevic, "Drivers' fatigue studies", Ergonomics , vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 381-389, 1997.
  22. M. Mon-Williams, J. P. Wann and S. Rushton, "Binocular vision in a virtual world: visual deficits following the wearing of a head-mounted display", Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 387-391, 1993.
  23. D. L. Ehrlich, "Near vision stress: vergence adaptation and accommodative fatigue", Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 353-357, 1987.
  24. E. Peli, "The visual effects of head-mounted display (HMD) are not distinguishable from those of desk-top computer display", Vision Res. , vol. 38, pp. 2053-2066, 1998.
  25. T. Inoue and H. Ohzu, "Accommodative responses to stereoscopic three-dimensional display", Appl. Opt., vol. 36, no. 19, pp. 4509-4515, 1997.
  26. A. Oohira and M. Ochiai, "Influence on visual function by a stereoscopic TV programme with binocular liquid crystal shutter and HI-Vision TV display", Ergonomics, vol. 39, pp. 1310-1314, 1996.
  27. T. Yamazaki, K. Kamijo and S. Fukuzumi, "Quantitative evaluation of visual fatigue encountered in viewing stereoscopic 3D displays: near-point distance and visual evoked potential study", Proc. SID, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 245-247, 1990.
  28. M. Emoto, Y. Nojiri and F. Okano, "Changes in fusional vergence limit and its hysteresis after viewing stereoscopic TV", Displays, vol. 25, pp. 67-76, 2004.
  29. H. Yamanoue, "A study on tolerance for geometrical distortions between L/R images on shooting 3D-HDTV", Syst. Comp. Jpn., vol. 29, no. 5, 1998.
  30. L. K. Frank and T. Alexander, "Visual comfort of binocular and 3D displays", Displays, vol. 25, pp. 99-108, 2004.
  31. B. Choquet, "3DTV studies at CCETT", in TAO 1st Int. Symp. , 1993.
  32. CCIR, "Design of a System of Stereoscopic Television", CCIR XI/22-E, Moscow, U.S.S.R., 1958.
  33. I. P. Beldie and B. Kost, "Luminance asymmetry in stereo TV images", in Proc. SPIE, vol. 1457, 1991, pp. 242-247.
  34. J. Fournier and T. Alpert, "Human factor requirements for a stereoscopic television service", in Proc. SPIE, vol. 2177, 1994, pp. 45-54.
  35. A. Hanazato, M. Okui and I. Yuyama, "Subjective evaluation of cross talk disturbance in stereoscopic displays", in SDI 20th Int. Display Res. Conf., 2000.
  36. S. Pastoor, "Human Factors in 3D Imaging", HHI Report, 1996.
  37. J. Konrad, B. Lacotte and E. Dubois, "Cancellation of image crosstalk in time-sequential displays of stereoscopic video", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 897-908, 2000.
  38. K. C. Huang, J. C. Yuan, C. H. Tsai and W. J. Hsueh, "Study of factors affecting stereopsis in stereoscopic display", in 3D Image Conf., vol. 149, 2001, p. 9.
  39. Y. Nojiri, H. Yamanoue, A. Hanazato, M. Emoto and F. Okano, "Visual comfort/discomfort and visual fatigue caused by stereoscopic HDTV viewing", in Proc. SPIE Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XI, , vol. 5291, 2004, pp. 303-313.
  40. Y. Nojiri, H. Yamanoue, A. Hanazato and F. Okano, "Measurement of parallax distribution and its application to the analysis of visual comfort for stereoscopic HDTV", in Proc. SPIE, vol. 5006, 2003, pp. 195-205.
  41. A. S. Percival, "The relation of convergence to accommodation and its practical bearing", Ophthal. Rev., vol. 11, pp. 313 -328, 1892.
  42. R. North and D. B. Henson, "Adaptation to prism-induced heterophoria in subjects with abnormal binocular vision or atsthenopia", Amer. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt., vol. 58, pp. 746-752, 1981.
  43. D. G. Milder and R. D. Reineke, "Phoria adaptation to prisms", Arch. Neurol. , vol. 40, pp. 339-342, 1983.
  44. W. L. Larson and J. Faubert, "An investigation of prism adaptation latency", Optometry and Vis. Sci., vol. 71, pp. 38-42, 1994.
  45. C. Schor and T. Tsuetaki, "Fatigue of accommodation and vergence modifies their mutual interactions", Investigative Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., vol. 28, pp. 1250-1259, 1987.
  46. G. L. Stephens and R. Jones, "Horizontal fusional amplitudes after adaptation to prism", Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25-28, 1990.
  47. B. Sethi and R. V. North, "Vergence adaptive changes with varying magnitudes of prism-induced disparities and fusional amplitudes", Amer. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 263-268, 1987.
  48. D. B. Henson and R. North, "Adaptation to prism-induced heterophoria", Amer. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 129-137, 1980.
  49. J. W. Morley, et al. "Role of monkey midbrain near-response neurons in phoria adaptation", J. Neurophysiol., vol. 67, pp. 1475-1492, 1992.
  50. S. D. Risley, "A new rotary prism", Trans. Amer. Ophthalmol. Soc., vol. 5, pp. 412-413, 1889.
  51. I. M. Borish, "7 Versions and Vergences, VI. Vergence Tests," in Clinical Refraction, 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: Professional, 1975, pp. 226-229.
  52. ITU, "Subjective Assessment of Stereoscopic Television Pictures", ITU-R Recommendation BT.1438, 2000.
  53. J. Faubert, P. Simonet and J. Gresset, "Effects of induced transverse chromatic aberration from an ophthalmic lens on spatio-temporal thresholds", Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt., vol. 19, pp. 336-346, 1999.
  54. J. Faubert, "The influence of optical distortions and transverse chromatic aberration on motion parallax and stereopsis in natural and artificial environments," in Three-dimensional Television, Video and Display Technologies , B. Javidi, and F. Okano, Eds. Physics Edition ed. Berlin: Germany: Springer Verlag, 2002, pp. 359-396.
  55. M. Saffir, "A Comparative Study of scales constructed by three psychophysical methods", Psychometrika, vol. 2, pp. 179-198, 1937.
  56. L. Cignek, "The EEG response (evoked potential) to light stimulus in man", Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 13, pp. 165-172, 1961.
  57. H. Yamanoue, M. Okui, F. Okano and I. Yuyama, "Geometrical analysis of puppet theater and cardboard effects in stereoscopic images", J. Inst. Image Inf. TV Engineers, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 575-582, 2002.
  58. K. Masaoka, A. Hanazato, M. Emoto, H. Yamanoue, Y. Nojiri and F. Okano, "Space distortion display system for stereoscopic images", J. Electron. Imaging, 2005. to be published.

Cited By

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited