Abstract

We compared the characteristics of state-of-the-art mobile display systems based on reflective and transmissive liquid crystal displays (LCDs) and an organic light-emitting display with respect to physical characterization metrics and observer studies. Physical performance factors provided information on the differences among display technologies. Observer studies resulted in different system ranking between the task-based performance and user-preference approaches. The results of the physical characterization and preference study showed that the reflective LCD ranked lower. We also found that ambient illumination played a lesser role than previously seen in large-format workstation displays. The methodology developed in this study provides an initial insight into the comparison of alternative technologies for display of diagnostic images in small portable devices.

© 2008 IEEE

Spatial resolution and noise in organic light-emitting diode displays for medical imaging applications

Asumi Yamazaki, Chih-Lei Wu, Wei-Chung Cheng, and Aldo Badano
Opt. Express 21(23) 28111-28133 (2013)

Factors affecting the psychophysical image quality evaluation of mobile phone displays: the case of transmissive liquid-crystal displays

Youn Jin Kim, M. Ronnier Luo, Wonhee Choe, Hong Suk Kim, Seung Ok Park, Yeseul Baek, Peter Rhodes, Seongdeok Lee, and Chang Yeong Kim
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25(9) 2215-2222 (2008)

Improving color reproduction accuracy of a mobile liquid crystal display

Eric Kirchner, Ivo van der Lans, Francisco M. Martínez-Verdú, and Esther Perales
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 34(1) 101-110 (2017)

Effect of ambient light on electronically displayed medical images as measured by luminance-discrimination thresholds

Diane C. Rogers, R. Eugene Johnston, and Stephen M. Pizer
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4(5) 976-983 (1987)

Computational observers and visualization methods for stereoscopic medical imaging

Fahad Zafar, Yaacov Yesha, and Aldo Badano
Opt. Express 22(19) 22246-22267 (2014)